Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I think it is actually part of a strategy. Obviously some models are less profitable than others and may see longer release intervals. There are also external circumstances that historically has affected the release cadence, i.e. Intels failure to deliver on their roadmap.

Having worked a directly or indirectly in product development my whole career I would not believe Apple acts without a strategy. But sometimes there are other considerations which "messes" with your strategy. The current transition roadmap seems fairly clear at this point but Apple has not reached a stable release cadence with the new chips yet.
OK, but how do you attribute a coherent strategy to Apple not updating the Mac Mini for four years, from late 2014 to late 2018? That seems more like a lack of coherent strategy to me—like maybe they couldn't decide whether they were going to drop it or not. And while of course other considerations can intervene and cause delays, I don't see how one could seriously say that external factors (e.g., delays in Intel's roadmap) prevented Apple from updating it for four whole years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sockdoggy
what's the point of HDMI? how many really use a second monitor with an iMac 27? sure there are some but certainly not the majority ...
and 27 would be a disappointment, would have expected 30 ...
I hope it accepts video signals so that we can use the iMac screen as monitor.
This would be appreciated by many people currently working from home and using Windows laptops.
 
I hope it accepts video signals so that we can use the iMac screen as monitor.
This would be appreciated by many people currently working from home and using Windows laptops.
Apple droppd the ability to use iMacs as external monitors in 2014, and didn't bring it back with the new M1 iMac, so I'm guessing it won't be available with the big iMac either. I agree that's unfortunate, since these really would make beautiful external monitors. Though there is a *possible* workaround:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Sandstorm
Maybe iMac Pro in 2 sizes (just like MacBook Pro) - 27" 5K and 32" 6K?
ps - I would DEFINITELY choose the 32", but understand why some would prefer to keep the medium size 27" (medium by todays desktop monitor standards).
 
  • Like
Reactions: sockdoggy
No different to M1 vs M1 Pro/Max for single thread performance???
I read that is the case. How true is that?

Yep. The M1 Pro has the same core running at the same clock as the M1. It does have faster memory, but a single core probably can’t make use of that in most applications.
 
I hope it accepts video signals so that we can use the iMac screen as monitor.
This would be appreciated by many people currently working from home and using Windows laptops.
Monterey allows you to screen share. You can easily blast your iPhone to the iMac, your iMac to an Apple TV and possibly your MacBook to your iMac.
Windows? Not a chance me thinks!
 
Pro and Pro Max is the new chipset Apple will be using.
I was thinking that these may not be powerful enough? I know geekbench is just a drop in the ocean when looking at processors but the current iMac Pro’s have higher scores. Maybe they will clock it higher. Either way I think the max and pro would work wonders in an iMac!
 
My absolute dream would be - all the mentioned (and expected) M1 Pro/Max specs, 32" 6K ProMotion display, full biometrics (Face ID used for basic logins & touch ID for extra layer of security (confirming purchases & so on)).
And a big one - HDMI 2.1 with target display mode!
 
  • Like
Reactions: P-DogNC
I'm just hoping apple will bring out a 27" 5k mini LED XDR display with promotion to go with my MacBook Pro M1 Max

Would it be worth the probable 2 grand plus asking price then though? When there are other options on the market.
 
Would it be worth the probable 2 grand plus asking price then though? When there are other options on the market.
most likely not. I do mostly photo and graphic work so HDR isn't really needed but I just feel after using the MBP screen, using lesser monitors would be a let down. Unless you have recs for a nice 4/5k screen that's great with color for photo related stuff?
 
  • Like
Reactions: tpfang56
OK, but how do you attribute a coherent strategy to Apple not updating the Mac Mini for four years, from late 2014 to late 2018? That seems more like a lack of coherent strategy to me—like maybe they couldn't decide whether they were going to drop it or not. And while of course other considerations can intervene and cause delays, I don't see how one could seriously say that external factors (e.g., delays in Intel's roadmap) prevented Apple from updating it for four whole years.
I believe Mac Mini is not a strategic product for Apple, it is probably not generating enough profit to warrant a lot of resources.

In product development you do not have unlimited resources. If another product needs more focus because it is strategically more important resources will be diverted to the more important project and an update of a less important product cancelled or delayed.

From the inside the decisions are typically well analyzed and motivated. From the outside it may not be obvious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: citysnaps
Guys sorry but it's not going to look anything like that.

Expect the same form factor as the new iMac just black bezels, bigger screen and available in silver and space grey only.

That's all you're getting.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Zdigital2015
OK, but how do you attribute a coherent strategy to Apple not updating the Mac Mini for four years, from late 2014 to late 2018? That seems more like a lack of coherent strategy to me—like maybe they couldn't decide whether they were going to drop it or not. And while of course other considerations can intervene and cause delays, I don't see how one could seriously say that external factors (e.g., delays in Intel's roadmap) prevented Apple from updating it for four whole years.
They could have, but the performance improvements weren’t that great, so maybe they felt it wasn’t worth the hassle.

If you ask me, it doesn’t matter if it’s a 3% faster, if there’s a new chip, either use it or adjust the price accordingly (you’re selling 4 years old tech). Apple did neither. Hopefully we’ll return to roughly yearly refreshes now that apple controls design and production of the chips.
 
"The device will feature the same M1 Pro and M1 Max chips that Apple introduced with the MacBook Pro models, and there could possibly be an added configuration."

The Intel iMac already has a 10-core CPU and up to 128GB RAM, and Intel's Alder Lake chips expected in the next few weeks have up to 16 cores, so I could imagine a further iteration of the M1 SoC with either more cores, or the efficiency cores (that can't be used for hyperthreading) replaced with performance cores, plus more real estate for memory. The alternative would be to leave a top-end Intel offering until the M2/A15 family is ready.

My main interest, though, is a larger 32-in display or failing which, an identically-bodied monitor that could be hooked up alongside. Otherwise I might wait for a revised Mac Mini and do my own thing with a widescreen non-Apple display.
 
Last edited:
I don't see it starting at only $2k. I will have a more expensive screen than the 14" MBP. I'm guessing $2500.
 
I'm IN for a 21:9 Apple iMac... but I want it to resurrect target display mode or similar so that when Apple makes the guts seem too old or when macOS won't update on those guts anymore but I still have a spectacular screen with plenty of years left, I have a way to keep using that screen with perhaps Mac Mini or Mac Pro Jr 2025 or so.
Guess what? You won’t get either of those. Creating a mini-LED display at that size in 16:9 for mass production is going to be difficult enough much less a super-wide. Target Display Mode has been gone since 2013, and replaced with AirPlay to Mac, SideCar and Universal Control plus third party solutions like Luna and AstroPad. No, none of them are TDM, but they are close enough for Apple. TDM is gone for good.
 
Mark my words. It’ll be a 5.5K 29.5” display (rounded up to 30” for marketing).

Apple are masters at segmenting a product line. They won’t go 32” to encroach on XDR territory.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Amadeus71
I hope it comes in multiple colours. Just because it is the pro machine, don't mean it has to be boring.
I remember the iMac DV SE only came in graphite. For some reason, it’s been a multi decade habit of theirs to make high/top end machines grayscale.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.