Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I've mentioned this in another thread already, but I bought one of the original iMac Pro base/standard configurations, shortly after it was released. For me, it was to do exactly what Apple marketed it for; replacing one of the cylinder shaped Mac Pros. I feel like it did everything promised as a decent upgrade from one of them. I also agree that the list price is way too high, though. I only bought mine because Micro Center was doing a $1,000 off sale on them at the time, making it a far more sensible purchase.

Another plus on the iMac Pro, back then, is that Apple allowed buying the same AppleCare 3 year extended warranty plan for one that covered any of the standard iMacs. I rarely pay for extended warranties on anything, but that deal seemed great when you consider the repair cost for pretty much anything that might go wrong on an iMac Pro. I was really surprised Apple didn't have a more costly AppleCare plan just for the iMac Pro, but they didn't....
 
iMac Pro was a terrible value; high price, poor performer (thanks to non-existent cooling), zero upgrade path, gimped GPU.

So long iMac Pro, you won't be missed.
Apple made the best of a bad situation that Intel put them in. It was a reasonable value at an understandable price. Even Apple haters like LTT talked about it and found it reasonable at the time. It aged terribly like all Intel based machines.

They should bring it back but only if they still go with pie in the sky prices for the Mac Pro. If the new Mac Pro is reasonable then it won't make sense anymore.
 
iMac Pro was a terrible value; high price, poor performer (thanks to non-existent cooling), zero upgrade path, gimped GPU.

So long iMac Pro, you won't be missed.

Could not disagree more. I'm fortunate enough to get to use pretty much any piece of kit I want for the most part, and my couple of iMac Pro units have been by FAR my most favourite pieces of Apple gear I've ever owned.

The 4 TB ports + 10Gbe were incredibly useful, and the units scaled really well for stuff that I did every day - lots of virtualisation and the like. One of mine has gone now (the smaller 8 core), and it will be missed.

It's been a fantastic solid work-horse. I've also got access to some i9 current gen iMacs too - they're also great machines of course, and in some respects faster than the 'Pro, but I miss those TB ports and how much the units can do before they slow down.

Loved them, great bits of kit.
 
I couldn't believe the price of the iMac Pro, I thought it was a misprint when it first came out :D
Is everyone forgetting the spec for spec comparisons that were all over the internet? It was pretty comparable to a similar PC do it yourself build. If the components were out of your price range that's fine, but Apple didn't charge an unreasonable price.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's possible, the old cheese grater wasn't that expensive, it was definitely on the premium side but not crazy.
The old cheese grater was an amazing machine, great price. The iMac Pro was definitely over priced. I’m lucky I have a family member who works in a retail store. Apple for the past 10 years has had a penchant for over-designing and adding a stupid markup.
 
  • Love
Reactions: qoop
The standard iMac Pro remains available across much of the rest of Europe and Asia, but with lengthy shipping estimates. It's likely that iMac Pro availability will continue to fluctuate, but the end of the line is clearly in sight for the computer.
Given how this ran out of stock then more become available, this might not be the last article.
 
Last edited:
Considering Apple takes FOREVER to release products, you'd think that all their products would be top-of-class allstars!
Homepod
iPod hifi
Air power...never made it to prod
MacBook - they keep killing and bringing it back
 
Amazing how many harsh critics there are here...
News Flash - not every product Apple releases will be an allstar.
sour grapes. They can't afford, have never used one or don't need that much power yet comment on how bad it is.
Its a free country, hehe
 
Just sold my iMac Pro for a newer iMac 2020. I absolutely love the iMac Pro and there are specifics things about it that I do not expect the iMac 2020 to do as well and I am thinking about some of those use cases and ways to do them well with the new iMac.

That said, there are things with the new iMac that will be better - I can ditch my eGPU as an example!
 
That says more about how poor Apple's computers are LOL
I have a late 2012, 27” iMac with a 1TB fusion drive that is still more than pulling it’s weight. My son, who advocates for PCs, has built 2 gaming PCs in the mean time and is now jonesing for another. I would say that selecting a PC it’s all about use cases and how much money you are willing to burn to get another 10%-20% of processing speed or whether frame rates matter much with spreadsheet, browsing, word processing or quicken.

Right now, I expect my next computer an M1X or M2 Mac. I will likely steer clear of an all in 1 design so I can avoid being forced To upgrade my monitor with my processing system.
 
I have a late 2012, 27” iMac with a 1TB fusion drive that is still more than pulling it’s weight. My son, who advocates for PCs, has built 2 gaming PCs in the mean time and is now jonesing for another. I would say that selecting a PC it’s all about use cases and how much money you are willing to burn to get another 10%-20% of processing speed or whether frame rates matter much with spreadsheet, browsing, word processing or quicken.

Right now, I expect my next computer an M1X or M2 Mac. I will likely steer clear of an all in 1 design so I can avoid being forced To upgrade my monitor with my processing system.
Gaming and video editing are the computer killers. For most other common tasks if it's getting security updates it's probably fine.
 
Apple made the best of a bad situation that Intel put them in. It was a reasonable value at an understandable price. Even Apple haters like LTT talked about it and found it reasonable at the time. It aged terribly like all Intel based machines.

They should bring it back but only if they still go with pie in the sky prices for the Mac Pro. If the new Mac Pro is reasonable then it won't make sense anymore.
What bad situation by Intel? The cylinder Mac Pro was Apple's own doing. They designed the thermals thinking it would handle modern GPUs.
 
Is everyone forgetting the spec for spec comparisons that were all over the internet? It was pretty comparable to a similar PC do it yourself build. If the components were out of your price range that's fine, but Apple didn't charge an unreasonable price.
The Intel 18 core chip scored around 3,200 in Cinebench R15 when it came out, the best Threadripper of the day scored around 5,000. At the time I just needed a cheap-ish rendering machine, wasn't bothered about anything else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amartinez1660
Likely won't be true when the next M-based iMac is released for far less money!
Of course, but the same statement will be (hopefully) true about the successor of that machine as well. So it's a bit of a strange, albeit true, statement? You're never going to have a machine that's as good as technology that isn't invented or in circulation yet... I'll definitely be in the market for an AS iMac, but will likely wait for a 2nd gen.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.