If Shaw Wu is so spectacularly and consistently wrong with his predictions, why do MacRumors and other sites insist on reporting everything he says?
Lol. I'd love to see all environmental agencies in the world switch to Atom-based computers. See how long it takes them to find out what's going on to protest about it.![]()
If Shaw Wu is so spectacularly and consistently wrong with his predictions, why do MacRumors and other sites insist on reporting everything he says?
It may have something to do with web site hits?![]()
Still missing is a $699-$899 model that features Mac OS, Nvidia GPU, Firewire and screen or not...for $699 or so, would expect a duo core ONLY since the iMAc will ship with duo still, otherwise, for $600, you can build a quad that stomps the present Mac Pro with a HACK.
Haven't tried it but the so called EFIX allows you to update without editing plist/kext files, otherwise you have to go to OSX86.org and see what is needed to do in order to run latest OS.
Not so bad once you know how to edit.
Apple needs to keep up.
A 30" iMac would be an easy purchase IMO.
Single core, dual core, quad core, octo core - I don't care. JUST RELEASE THE THINGS ALREADY!!!
My original Intel iMac is long in the tooth and the max 2G of RAM is killing me. I need an upgrade, and I need it NOW.
And Apple, would it kill you to throw some extra USB ports and a media card reader on the thing so I can clear my desktop of these ugly devices (hub & media card reader)? You're kind of killing the whole All-In-One vibe with your lack of on-board connections...
more like $3K-$4K
yeah, right !!!!
go back and look at what he listed as configurables
if Apple lets loose one of those for $3000, it's a done deal
Ah yes I didn't see that, those might as well be $1M cause that's not gonna happen anytime soon. Maybe 2-5 years.
With quads comming at 2.33, 2.66 and 2.83GHz he idea of Apple selling faster processors with lower cores on lower end models doesn't seem likely me. I'm not saying it won't happen, but it is very un-Apple like.
OOOOH the endless possiblities!! Quad-core, 8 gig of ram, bluray dvd, snow leopard. Now all we need will be the usb 3.0 and we are set....
I really have no idea what you are talking about because quad core 2 have been out for a looong time.
Because it is ultra entertaining to stoke the needy-nerdies into slavering, squealing, thrashing, deluded fan boys. I love it, love watching it.
Here, let's stoke those fires as well:
I BET THE NEXT iMAC IS COMING TOMORROW AND HAS QUAD CORE DUAL PROCESSORS WITH ULTRA-SEX FOR $999!
^-^ Ah. So refreshing.
I would like to see Apple do an update every other Tuesday for the 1st 3 months of 2009, so far (the 1st month) they've met that but I would like to see them release either iMacs or Mac Minis this tuesday, the other one on Feb 17th, and Mac Pros on March 3rd (assuming they could get the processors early as they've been known to do before) but I don't know about March 17th and March 31st....Displays and AppleTV perhaps? or perhaps some new products.
Me want Quad Core MacMINI.
Me want it NOW.
grunt
Surely they'd just have core 2 duo on the entry level and drop the 3.06Ghz model?
I'm sure a 2.83Ghz C2Q with 12Mb Cache and 8Gb of 1066Mhz RAM would be faster overall than a 3.06Ghz with 6Mb Cache and 4Gb of 800Mhz RAM just because it would have more bandwidth to keep it fed with data.
Hmm... I hope 20-incher gets some form of Quad-core config.
Unlikely as the 20"models would have trouble with the 65w SFF quadcores and 2.0ghz mobile quadcore costs as much as the 2.83ghz SFF ship.
I found this in another thread. They said the Apple store servers went down for a little last night and a couple of refreshes showed this. Looks like a fake.
![]()