Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Well that's stability I have never experienced with MacOS but yes it was in general far more stable than Windows and the whole ecosystem less polluted with bloatware or real malware. I actually enjoy (present time) the small open source stuff that's written for mac (like OCLP now to keep my 2012 iMac alive with Sidecar and Continuity while Apple itself fails (or chooses) not to deliver.
 
Not in my experience. And of course there was that whole Y2K experience that was so much fun in Windows,

In my experience, and this may be completely anecdotal, I've had about 20 different Macs in personal use since my 1984 Apple //c, and I've never had any of these alleged OS problems that I read about, on any of my Macs or the Macs we use in our business. I usually only run software from the big guys or well proven smaller vendors, Apple, Microsoft, Adobe, Quickbooks, PDF Expert, Affinity, Carbon Copy Cloner, etc. and many others from long ago. But no OS crashes, no mysterious "I guess I'll just restart in Safe Mode" problem solving. We've had hardware issues and app issues, but no OS issues.Scanners and printers all mount and work as they're supposed to.

My advice is: don't use pre-release software, and don't use junk apps from the millions of apps out there for Mac and Windows. Not as much fun as exploring the latest apps your friends have enthused about, but none of the problems either.

And of course, stop throwing around your phones, laptops, and ipads.

Now put down those floppy disks and get off my porch.
Classic Mac OS was broken by design. Cooperative multitasking and no memory protection. Even a small bug in otherwise well behaving software could sink the whole system.

It worked in 1984 when you only ran one application at once.

But it couldn't keep up with time and the more demanding and complex computing requirements.

Apple should have created a replacement much earlier.
 
Last edited:
A quarter century. Wow. I feel old. My first Mac was a Plus, in 1990. Shelled out a few hundred extra for a 20 MB Rodime hard drive that's almost as big as my Studio. Good times.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jwdsail
Yep.

It was one of the earliest cases of trying to change user behavior.

The concept behind the puck mouse was that it was supposed to be moved around with finger tips instead of the palm of the hand. In reality users want to rest their hand on a mouse as it is more comfortable, but that doesn’t work when a mouse is round. Just causes hand strain.

The same issue we are seeing in recent times. The MacBook Pro 2016 with Touch Bar and shallow keyboard didn’t feel natural and didn’t give users the physical feedback they want.

Same issue we are seeing again with VR fans thinking that day to day computing can be done in a 3D environment with hand waving all day. That’s not how 99% of people want to use computers. It’s tiring and will wear out the neck and shoulders if that was being done every day for years.

User comfort needs to be put first. Always.
Many of us naturally use our fingertips and don’t want a hand mouse.
 
  • Love
Reactions: orbital~debris
24" is a toy. I loved my 27" so much, but the "smoke" @ his screen and the dead of his HDD made me sell it at the end. With a 32" i probably woul'd get another one. But the notebook hooked up at the samsung tv works perfect as well ;-).
 
Everyone laughs at this but a user here explained why quite clearly. Apple wants you to use it wireless and if you could charge and use wirelessly many would be confused. This explicitly removes that possibility. Once I read that explanation it suddenly made sense.
If so, the Magic Trackpad would be equally wireless, un-sane, and un-usable while charging. Instead, the Magic Trackpad works both wireless and wired.

No, it's a lack of testing on Apple's part during the design of the Magic Mouse, multiplied by the inherent bias of macOS toward trackpad usage.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: orbital~debris
If so, the Magic Trackpad would be equally wireless, un-sane, and un-usable while charging. Instead, the Magic Trackpad works both wireless and wired.

The trackpad doesn't move around on the desktop for cursor movements; unlike a mouse. Allowing wired and wireless use by design, much like a keyboard, makes sense.

No, it's a lack of testing on Apple's part during the design of the Magic Mouse, multiplied by the inherent bias of macOS toward trackpad usage.

Hardly. The MM is easily shared when not in use, such as when you are away from the Mac. The design was intended to be wireless from the start, so testing with a charging cable is pointless. Wireless mice, whether from Apple, Logitech, Dell, MS et. al. are intended to be used without a cable, and similarly tenon't even have charging functionality built in.

I'm not a big fan of the MM and prefer my M720 with many more buttons, but can appreciate that it is a good design.
 
  • Like
Reactions: orbital~debris
Sad that the iMac has been reduced to a single entry-level model that may go three years without an update... :(
Even if some think it is an entry-level model the performance of a M1 is amazing compared to my previous 2015 iMac w/4.0GHz Intel Core i7 w/ 4GB based M395X. It's way faster in daily usage with unified memory compared to way slower DIMMs and SSD R/W speeds. It's just we need now an enhanced performance update to this model and perhaps a larger model introduction.
 
Later if they do away with an accessible beta of that. I just use latest LogiTech G Hub software with any wired or wireless version of G502 series with a iMac. Even though it's a gaming mouse it's way more ergonomic than Apple's Magic Mouse offerings and allows more customization. Around the holidays the prices nosedive on this line of mice as well as many other brands.
Do you get smooth kinetic scrolling with the wheel with this software/mouse?
 
The motherboard appeared to have been meant for a different computer.
Maybe, however, I am going to go ahead and disagree with you. A lot of the design appears to be about modularity — which I can understand why that seems odd/unreasonable in an AIO computer.


My guess, not being a trained engineer, is the modularity was to accommodate flexibility in the final design. After all, the computer was egg-like shape, something unprecedented(?), and thus foreseeable requiring a lot of tweaks.

As someone who disassembled his rev. A iMac several times to perform upgrades and internal cleaning, the external-style connectors added nice durability — although, indeed, also bulkiness. (FYI: in the link above, the “ketchup and mustard cables” are power.

...

Speaking of upgrades and modularity, I forgot to mention two things in my earlier post ( primarily replying to @swingerofbirch ):




I recall desiring and very strongly considering both but, admittedly, can’t remember if I actually purchased the Voodoo2 card. I eventually shied away from the CPU upgrade because it required sending in your iMac’s original daughter card, and I couldn’t be without a computer for long — and, of course, knowing if something went wrong in that process, I would have a giant, expensive, colorful desk weight.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jwdsail
If the new one had the Apple logo at the front and wasn’t so light and pastel, I think it’d be peak iMac design. The back colours are so deep and rich, i with they were fully like that with an Apple logo. I bet it’s going away just to come back in glorious fashion
 
Apple is really killing me without a 27 inch iMac. What an aseholes the Marketing department is 'let's maximize our profit by deliberately NOT making what everybody needs'. Desperately looking for a maxed out 2020 27" 5k then to retire the upgraded 2012. Insane. The only 'not cable clogged' option is probalbly a 'hidden under the table mac mini' and a third party monitor with integrated webcam. Too bad Samsung got the M8 all wrong.

Edit: Altough I just read there are a refreshed Samsung M8 2023 and InfinityView S9 in the works with better specs.

This is exactly where I am. I am basically going to keep going with my 27" iMac until it gives out completely because not only do I not want a mac mini or mac studio just shoved under my desk. I completely built my desk with the iMac in mind, and not having a tower. So unless my solid wood desk gives out before the iMac I will just keep trudging on with my iMac. I have tried to talk myself into a mini or a studio a few times, and always quickly talk myself out of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: orbital~debris
I would prefer an iMac, but if push came to shove I would not be averse to a Mac Studio and display. The Mac Studio can sit just under the display so it doesn’t really take any more desk space
Yeah, but it still is not aesthetically pleasing. I do not want that big box sitting right under my monitor all the time. So I will stick with the iMac even though mine is old enough that it can not update anymore, but it will be used until it just can not be used anymore or they come out with a new one. Might end up saving me several thousand dollars because I might miss a complete normal upgrade cycle for me.
 
Yeah, but it still is not aesthetically pleasing. I do not want that big box sitting right under my monitor all the time. So I will stick with the iMac even though mine is old enough that it can not update anymore, but it will be used until it just can not be used anymore or they come out with a new one. Might end up saving me several thousand dollars because I might miss a complete normal upgrade cycle for me.
Tip: Mount the Mini or Studio under the desk. Upside-down for better Bluetooth transmission, if it's not mounted under a metallic desk.
 
I’d buy an iMac with a 10 gig ethernet port on the back. It would be nice to have an SFP+ For either a fiber or copper connection, at 10G. For speedy network backups. 27” display would be nice. M2 or better.

The driving factor for me is 10G Ethernet simply because it is my new standard. I have a lot of equipment, routers, computers, branching, switches, all on 10G. I am not interested in dongles.
 
Ive been working on a project to mod an iMac G4 hoping Apple would update the iMac M1 so as during WWDC 2023 nothing was mentioned about a M3 one, I gave up waiting and got an iMac M1 VESA and attached it to my iMac G4:


 

Attachments

  • FzE9SPDX0AMvvCz.jpeg
    FzE9SPDX0AMvvCz.jpeg
    504.9 KB · Views: 46
Ive been working on a project to mod an iMac G4 hoping Apple would update the iMac M1 so as during WWDC 2023 nothing was mentioned about a M3 one, I gave up waiting and got an iMac M1 VESA and attached it to my iMac G4:

Cool mod, very retro modern.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.