ROTFMLOL!mkrishnan said:Different punitive mechanisms may be required!
__________________
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Damn that is funny.
ROTFMLOL!mkrishnan said:Different punitive mechanisms may be required!
__________________
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
jadekitty24 said:I get distracted easily, as it is I sometimes find myself staring at someones animated 'tar for minutes at a time.
Doctor Q said:Does anybody want to post a link to a forum system that's on the other extreme? I've seen a few, but I don't want to strain my eyes looking for them again myself.
Has anybody ever encountered a forum systems implemented with image-sig support but with limits (e.g., by pixel size or bytesize) that make it more practical and less intrusive than a free-for-all?
Wow, that board is terrible.Benjamin said:This ones pretty bad... http://battleforums.com/showthread.php?t=112486
Holy Crap you aint kidding!!Benjamin said:This ones pretty bad... http://battleforums.com/showthread.php?t=112486
I guess if we had to go that way those sig bars wouldn't be a bad choice, their not TOO annoying.Benjamin said:While I wouldn't mid a sig bar size img like these... http://siggymaker.gfxedit.com/ img should probably stay off for other reasons.
sushi said:Wow, that board is terrible.
Sure glad that we have it the way we do here at MR.
Interesting observation.shadowmoses said:Its so true MR is so much more clean and elegant than most other forums. hence the reason people enjoy posting here.....Its a good representation of Apple.
Deepdale said:Instead of staring at them, I curse them. Why people would choose avatars that annoy the daylights out of a certain percentage of other members is troubling, but why MacRumors even permits it is even more bewildering. It remains the only aspect that diminishes my enjoyment of an otherwise great site.
Woah, dude! And that's only one of many sites like that. How does anybody follow a conversation with all that clutter and distraction?Benjamin said:This ones pretty bad... http://battleforums.com/showthread.php?t=112486
Doctor Q said:Woah, dude! And that's only one of many sites like that. How does anybody follow a conversation with all that clutter and distraction?
Benjamin said:This ones pretty bad... http://battleforums.com/showthread.php?t=112486
Don't know what they would do with a few pixels.Doctor Q said:What if MacRumors allowed signature images but you could have at most one image and it had to be exactly 1 pixel high? What could people do with that?
I imagine that they could use a solid-color bar, a dotted or dashed line, a pretty gradient, or a message in Morse Code. What else?
And how much more could they do if it was 2 pixels high?
This isn't a proposed change. I'm just curious what people might think of.
I want you to feel the pain!Sun Baked said:Don't know what they would do with a few pixels.
__________________
![]()
If you can read THIS ... my signature is broken.