Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Is it just me or is The Verge pretty much on the same level as Gizmodo in terms of clickbaity, low quality tech news? I still largely remember The Verge as the site that had the temerity to complain about mobile web browser performance while having over 50 tracking scripts on a single page load.
Don’t know, don’t care.
 
Why are people defending this company on here is unbelievable
Questions of legality aside, it’s actually pretty neat if you’re even remotely a tinkerer at heart.
Didn't Nothing and Sunbird do this?
No, they used a different approach with a passthrough server. Beeper Mini communicates with iMessage directly on-device.
 
Beware. Allowing a 3rd party company access to your Apple ID to deliver you iMessages will also allow them access to everything else associated with your Apple ID. These companies will typically keep your Apple ID signed into a server based Mac and although they will claim that iMessages are the only part of your Apple account they will use, you have no guarantee that they are not seeing or harvesting other data from your account, nor can you be guaranteed that this company is keeping that system secure and protected enough from data breaches and hacking the way Apple does.
Beeper Mini talks directly to Apple's servers. There is no Mac mini server farm middleman. I'd still be skeptical about the possibility of them skimming the account credentials, but I guess I would also think them trying to break in would just trigger a 2FA popup and then nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NetMage
Facebook Messenger and Whatsapp are not as good as iMessage. I use both. Apple Music and TV are more or less stand alone apps, where you are not very likely to switch devices on-the-fly like you are with messaging apps.

And more importantly, since apps like those already exist, what is iMessage bringing to the table anyway?
It’s about what iMessage isn’t bringing to the table.

there are 3,000,000,000 android users. 100,000 downloads does not seem to indicate "Android and ‌iPhone‌ customers 'desperately want to be able to chat together'" as the developer says.

100,000 signups for a sketchy app which was guaranteed to break in a couple of days is insanely indicative of the demand.

If Apple released iMessage for Android officially I guarantee it’d break records for first-day app downloads.
 
Who thinks that behind this Beeper thing with iMessage is Google, such as Google providing some engineering resources to Beeper to keep finding inroads to the iMessaging system? I wouldn't be surprised it exists.
 


After Apple shut down the mechanism that Android app Beeper Mini was using to bring iMessage to Android users, Beeper Mini's developers today said that they have found a way to bring the app back, albeit with some major changes.

beeper-mini.jpg

The new version of the app requires users to sign in with an Apple ID, which was not needed with the prior version. All iMessages are also now sent and received through an email address rather than a phone number, though a fix is in development.

The prior version of Beeper Mini did not require an Apple ID, and it registered each Android user's phone number with Apple's iMessage servers without Apple's permission. The app's developers used reverse engineered iMessage protocols for the initial Beeper Mini release, taking advantage of Apple's iMessage servers.

Registering Android phone numbers with iMessage servers allowed Android users to send blue bubble messages to iPhone users, and the app supported all iMessage functionality, including read receipts, typing indicators, reactions, and more.

Apple was not keen on a third-party app registering non-iPhone numbers with its iMessage servers, and Apple ended up blocking Beeper Mini on Friday. Beeper Mini users were unable to send and receive messages when Apple made a change to its iMessage servers, and Beeper Mini founder Eric Migicovsky said at the time that Apple had found a way to stop Beeper Mini from working.

Apple on Saturday released a statement confirming that it took steps to shut down Beeper Mini. Apple said that the techniques that the app used posed risks to the security and privacy of iMessage users.

In a blog post, the Beeper Mini team said that Beeper Mini had the "fastest growing paid Android application in history," with more than 100,000 downloads. This is evidence that Android and iPhone customers "desperately want to be able to chat together" with all of the features available on iMessage.

Beeper Mini's developers say that despite reaching out to Apple, they have not heard back. It is unlikely that Apple will give in and allow Beeper Mini to function as it did, and Apple may shut down further functionality as well if it can.

There were questions about whether Apple would be able to put a stop to Beeper Mini because of the way that it mimicked an Apple device and registered phone numbers as Apple users, but Apple found a way. Apple does have plans to bring all iMessage like features to chats between iMessage users and Android users through RCS, a protocol that Apple will add to iPhones next year.

RCS will bring support for high quality video and images, emoji reactions, typing indicators, read receipts, and more, all features that Beeper Mini says that Android and iPhone users are desperate to have in cross-platform chats.

While Beeper Mini was a paid app with a 7-day free trial, Beeper Mini's developers plan to make it free because of the instability of the app. "Things have been a bit chaotic and we're not comfortable subjecting paying users to this," reads the blog post. Beeper Mini will be a subscription app again "as soon as things stabilize."

Article Link: iMessage for Android App 'Beeper Mini' is Back, Apple ID Sign In Now Required and Phone Numbers Don't Work

A lot of complaining in the comment section over Beeper Mini. Remember the stories of dates ghosting people on Android? The stories of kids excluding others from conversations on Android.

Beeper Mini probably wouldn't exist if some Apple users weren't such insufferable elitist.
 
Who thinks that behind this Beeper thing with iMessage is Google, such as Google providing some engineering resources to Beeper to keep finding inroads to the iMessaging system? I wouldn't be surprised it exists.
Seriously wouldn't be necessary. If Apple's API's are web based it would be trivial with a jail broken phone to monitor and study traffic.

It doesn't seem hard if a single person cared enough to do it and considering the spam I have seen in my single years in dating apps, it doesn't take big money to pull this off.

Honestly I am surprised it took this long. The scammers Apple is worried about probably doesn't care THAT much about their service because they can reach their users in the same screen via old fashioned off the shelf SMS.
 
the only way Apple can end this stupid issue is to release iMessage for Android.

I still don't understand the motivation for Apple to do this. Yes they improve the experience of the whatever percentage of iPhone users who use iMessage and SMS exclusively, but at a huge cost to them in terms of supporting all of those extra devices with no additional revenue, all with the privilege of losing one of their competitive advantages.
 
Android users who create an Apple account for the sole purpose of using this app have nothing to lose by giving out those Apple credentials, as they won't be using the account for any other reason than to send iMessages. Just create an Apple account and give only the absolute minimum of information needed during signup. That way, should the account get compromised at a later date, there is no risk to the individual who set up the account.
 
Android users who create an Apple account for the sole purpose of using this app have nothing to lose by giving out those Apple credentials, as they won't be using the account for any other reason than to send iMessages. Just create an Apple account and give only the absolute minimum of information needed during signup. That way, should the account get compromised at a later date, there is no risk to the individual who set up the account.
You lose control of your text history. Brilliant.
 
Beware. Allowing a 3rd party company access to your Apple ID to deliver you iMessages will also allow them access to everything else associated with your Apple ID. These companies will typically keep your Apple ID signed into a server based Mac and although they will claim that iMessages are the only part of your Apple account they will use, you have no guarantee that they are not seeing or harvesting other data from your account, nor can you be guaranteed that this company is keeping that system secure and protected enough from data breaches and hacking the way Apple does.
Kind of boils down to trust. Beeper Mini doesn't use a Mac in a closet like the rest.

So you would be taking their word for it that they don't harvest your credentials from the device like you take Apple's word for it that they can't access your data and won't change things so they can in the future.

They don't have the earned trust Apple has so they have to resort to independent security audits and open sourcing their code to build that trust.
 
“Beeper Mini had the "fastest growing paid Android application in history," with more than 100,000 downloads. This is evidence that Android and ‌iPhone‌ customers "desperately want to be able to chat together" with all of the features available on iMessage.”

Only 100,000? That’s really not that much, especially when all of these iMessage on android applications are going to be completely and totally irrelevant this time next year.
I am actually surprised that the number is that high.

If I had an Android device and want to use iMessage, there's no way I would pay $1.99/month for a service that will be frequently disrupted by Apple.

Most importantly, if I was a devout Android user, why would I care if Apple users see my conversation as green bubbles?
 
"we want to interop with iOS devices" but lets face it, android users won't mind using iMessage between themselves either, its just a better than anything google offers at the moment.
 
This is getting ridiculous. If you want iMessage functionality, get an iPhone. Android users are ridiculous.

It’s like being angry at Burger King for them not giving you a Big Mac yet you demand they do.
 
If I had an Android device and want to use iMessage, there's no way I would pay $1.99/month for a service that will be frequently disrupted by Apple.
I agree with this point. Being an Android user… I was concerned when they launched this with a price tag. I admittedly tried it… didn’t add my AppleID though. But the feature where it recognized my phone number tied to iMessage… worked.

At face value… it’s definitely a feature that should be paid for given the popularity of such a thing, I was hoping they would have placed a donation into the app instead of a subscription.

Most importantly, if I was a devout Android user, why would I care if Apple users see my conversation as green bubbles?
Apple users constantly bring up this topic about the color of the bubbles… Android users couldn’t care less about the color, it’s the features that’s behind it.
 
android users won't mind using iMessage between themselves either, its just a better than anything google offers at the moment.
I used Android after ditching my iPhone 6 right up until I purchased an iPhone 14 Pro and during that time iMessages never once came to mind. Having used RCS messaging on both Google and Samsung devices during that time and now using iMessage, iMessage doesn't do anything I couldn't do on Android. Even if it did, I certainly wouldn't have paid a monthly fee to use it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.