No guys it isn't fine, the text is fuzzy, tft screens are supposed to be run in native resolution mode otherwise the text is fuzzy, maybe with your eyesight it's not as much, but your eyesight will soon be seriously degraded because of this.That's what I did. Switched to 1024x640 on a 13" macbook. All is fine now even from 2 feet back and my eyesight isn't that good.
Who has been posting this blatant lie? It wasn't implemented in leopard, it didn't get implemented in sl, and it's not there in lion.I understand from reading many forum postings that "resolution independence" is implemented in OS X but most applications must be rewritten to handle it properly.
Who has been posting this blatant lie? It wasn't implemented in leopard, it didn't get implemented in sl, and it's not there in lion.
This blatant lie has been spread by the lying liars at Apple, Inc.
https://developer.apple.com/library.../HiDPIOverview/Introduction/Introduction.html
According to their shameless falsehoods, it has been possible to turn on resolution scaling ever since Tiger using the developer tools.
from an online review:Launch the Quartz Debug application.
From the Window menu, choose UI Resolution. A UI Resolution window appears.
Select Enable HiDPI display modes.
The payoff isn’t quite as exciting as you might think, either. As Cult Of Mac’s video shows, the resolutions on offer leave the screen displaying everything over-sized as we do not currently have the high-res displays to go with it.
What would be the point? The feature has been there since 2005. Disbelieve me if you like, facts seem to have little relevance to you.Post me internet archive page of said document not an 05/2011 version.
Believe me, I agree that this is one of the greatest usability problems on the Mac platform. I think that Apple has been lax in not forcing this issue with new and updated applications.You are coming here trying to be snarky wrt a real usability problem people are facing
That's absurd. What do I have to be embarrassed about? I was snarky, yes, because that's the way my sense of humor often turns when people make foolish statements on the Internet. I have a "sarcasm" smilieand you are embarrassing yourself I hope you realise:
That is exactly what jimla said, and you accused him of lying:from an online review:The payoff isnt quite as exciting as you might think, either. As Cult Of Macs video shows, the resolutions on offer leave the screen displaying everything over-sized as we do not currently have the high-res displays to go with it.
See what I said earlier about foolish statements. Calling something a "lie", and by extension accusing someone of posting a lie, is a serious charge and extremely offensive. Especially when what they say is absolutely correct: this feature has been implemented in every version since Tiger, and most applications have not been updated to handle it properly.Who has been posting this blatant lie? It wasn't implemented in leopard, it didn't get implemented in sl, and it's not there in lion.I understand from reading many forum postings that "resolution independence" is implemented in OS X but most applications must be rewritten to handle it properly.
And here, again, with the inappropriate language. Firstly, I'm not backing Apple on this, because as I've said they've dragged their heels and haven't put nearly enough pressure on developers. But even if I was, the word "delusional" is not appropriate.or maybe we are not prepared to go delusional to back apple.
This is a complete lie, this "feature" has always been broken and setting dpi via quartz from tiger onwards never worked and made the interface typeface look like crap.What would be the point? The feature has been there since 2005. Disbelieve me if you like, facts seem to have little relevance to you.
I would be embarrassed if | claimed other people made foolish statements but I were making them instead... well, at least you understand this is a major problem in the os...Believe me, I agree that this is one of the greatest usability problems on the Mac platform. I think that Apple has been lax in not forcing this issue with new and updated applications.That's absurd. What do I have to be embarrassed about? I was snarky, yes, because that's the way my sense of humor often turns when people make foolish statements on the Internet. I have a "sarcasm" smiliein my signature for that very reason.
It's not an application issue it's an os issue. I am sorry you felt offended with the word lie, but it is one.That is exactly what jimla said, and you accused him of lying:
See what I said earlier about foolish statements. Calling something a "lie", and by extension accusing someone of posting a lie, is a serious charge and extremely offensive. Especially when what they say is absolutely correct: this feature has been implemented in every version since Tiger, and most applications have not been updated to handle it properly.
Good natured corrections by being by your own admission snarky and calling up others for making foolish statements?The only one in this thread that has embarrassed themselves is you. It seems you don't respond well to good-natured corrections, so let me drop that for a moment and say what I should have said: Your post was out of line, and you were incorrect.
And here, again, with the inappropriate language. Firstly, I'm not backing Apple on this, because as I've said they've dragged their heels and haven't put nearly enough pressure on developers. But even if I was, the word "delusional" is not appropriate.
A software developer responded to an email i wrote his company with the following. Not sure what he writes is accurate?:
"Unfortunately, it is not clear why you are asking the same question once more.
I can only guess that you might not have understood Apple's concept of HiDPI.
Apple current implementation of HiDPI is based on 144 ppi, i.e. HiDPI needs
4 screen pixels to show a single user interface pixel.
To display 2560 x 1440 HiDPI pixels, you will need to connect a monitor
capable of displaying 5120 x 2880 screen pixels. The hardware of the iMac
is not capable of providing such a resolution, however.
Your iMac screen has 2560 x 1440 actual pixels, so it is capable of displaying
a HiDPI resolution of 1280 x 760 pixels."
Purchased a U2711 (2560 x 1440) for use with my MacBook Pro and for the two days I've been using it, I've been rocking an underlying headache from eye strain. I have pretty good vision and I was somewhat relieved/disappointed to find this thread. If there were any signs that Mountain Lion was going to provide a solution I might keep it on the strength of that but it's not looking too good.![]()
The only thing the mac guy can suggest is that you change the resolution on your machine. Of course, you may be able to read, but the icons will be HUGE