Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
No. I'm not certain about it. I'm seeking numbers from people who apparently have data to support their concrete assertions. I've yet to see any.

"I'd rather have the option to get my apps from a place I trust more than the app store anyway."

Certainly there must be other phones out there that can meet your needs. Why not vote with your currency and purchase one? And find happiness.
Can't I still want to keep an iPhone while wanting it to work better for me? Also, I don't "vote" with currency. And many who do vote don't stop there. Software can evolve. Corporate sycophants and loyalist usually don't.
 
  • Love
Reactions: turbineseaplane
Can't I still want to keep an iPhone while wanting it to work better for me?
Sure. But don’t expect the government to force apple to make the iPhone do what you want.
Also, I don't "vote" with currency.
I definitely have in the past. The manufacturer won’t miss my couple of bucks but I do what’s best for me.
And many who do vote don't stop there.
Ok.
Software can evolve.
It usually does.
Corporate sycophants and loyalist usually don't.
Why does this seem bother you? Live and let live. People have their own unique requirements.
 
Can't I still want to keep an iPhone while wanting it to work better for me? Also, I don't "vote" with currency. And many who do vote don't stop there. Software can evolve. Corporate sycophants and loyalist usually don't.

Got it, and nice obfuscation. You have no app store numbers/data to share.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
If you’re running an App Store and only making 90 billion per year, you can’t expect to find every blatant copycat app like this
nope for the 30% cut everyone seems to think apple is justified in take there should be no mistakes no errors copycats are fine but clones are just **** and apple shouldn't have let them through based on THEIR own rules.
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
Sure. But don’t expect the government to force apple to make the iPhone do what you want.
This article is about an indie developer, not the government. Users can certainly tell Apple what they want in their phones, but corporate sycophants and loyalists don't want users to do that. They should live and let live. All they do is complain about people who have their own unique requirements and ask everyone to accept whatever they get.
 
nope for the 30% cut everyone seems to think apple is justified in take there should be no mistakes no errors copycats are fine but clones are just **** and apple shouldn't have let them through based on THEIR own rules.
Apple only takes 15% or less from 98% of developers. I know the 30% sounds scarier, but it's not the norm.
 
Got it, and nice obfuscation. You have no app store numbers/data to share.
It's not an obfuscation. I mentioned that I don't know the numbers and data. Do you? You asked. Still, I can say that based on this article alone, one indie developer found two scam accounts, and there were dozens of scammy wordle accounts. I answered the rest.

How do you define obfuscation?
 
Last edited:
It's not an obfuscation. I mentioned that I don't know the numbers and data. Do you? You asked. Still, I can say that based on this article alone, one indie developer found two scam accounts,
Two scam accounts versus Apple's claim that it blocked more than 470,000 developer accounts due to fraud. Sometimes a little perspective is needed.

and there were dozens of scammy wordle accounts. I answered the rest.
Dozens of scammy wordle accounts cleared up in a day or two.
 
This article is about an indie developer, not the government. Users can certainly tell Apple what they want in their phones, but corporate sycophants and loyalists don't want users to do that. They should live and let live. All they do is complain about people who have their own unique requirements and ask everyone to accept whatever they get.
Since the world apparently is divided between corporate sycophants/loyalist and critics with no grey areas, the critics want the App Store regulated as they apparently don’t ascribe to “perfect is the enemy of good.” That the app store review process has holes in it means to some App Store regulation is welcome.

The critics should accept that any process isn’t perfect. I personally encourage changes either by sending emails to feedback@apple.com, social media or voting with your wallet.

I don’t endorse change through government regulation.
 
Since the world apparently is divided between corporate sycophants/loyalist and critics with no grey areas, the critics want the App Store regulated as they apparently don’t ascribe to “perfect is the enemy of good.” That the app store review process has holes in it means to some App Store regulation is welcome.

The critics should accept that any process isn’t perfect. I personally encourage changes either by sending emails to feedback@apple.com, social media or voting with your wallet.

I don’t endorse change through government regulation.

Archer suggests Apple could make a special "contact us" form only for developers so they can can report such apps.

Not all critics asking for regulation! Some want options, so we ask. Some, like indie developers in this article make suggestions to Apple, not the government. Archer is not a critic with no gray areas. When I ask for other ways to get apps, I'm not asking for app store regulation, and that certainly doesn't mean government regulation
 
Two scam accounts versus Apple's claim that it blocked more than 470,000 developer accounts due to fraud. Sometimes a little perspective is needed.


Dozens of scammy wordle accounts cleared up in a day or two.
In the last few months, the issue of App Store scam apps has become a lightning rod for Apple, with some estimates suggesting scam apps on the platform have made millions in revenue. Most recently, the mainstream game Wordle became the latest victim of the App Store's problem. Wordle clones sprang up across the App Store as the game spread in popularity, and some copycat apps even offered in-app subscriptions, despite the fact that the original game is entirely free to play.
You're clearly reading a different article
 
Not all critics asking for regulation! Some want options, so we ask. Some, like indie developers in this article make suggestions to Apple, not the government. Archer is not a critic with no gray areas. When I ask for other ways to get apps, I'm not asking for app store regulation, and that certainly doesn't mean government regulation
Not all “corporate sycophants and loyalists believe the current status shouldn’t change either. There is a mix of opinions on these threads.

And I understand the sentiment regarding “other ways to get apps”. How this will all play out remains to be seen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: applicious84
All those issue are simply even worse on Play store. Google is also very slow to take down fake apps.
 
Do you have an iPhone? Curious how you got all the apps off the phone since they are worthless. Oh, and what do you do with the iPhone if you don't use apps?
A fair questions fairly asked. I mostly use 1st party apps. I don't play games on my phone. I download my banking apps and apps like ecobee to control my thermostat (although I wish I could connect it to home kit without using the ecobee app), banking apps etc are from the store, I use MS Office which I pay for outside of the App Store and use the App Store to download. I don't do Facebook et al. All the apps on my phone fit on one screen with a few folders. I don't have hundreds of apps, perhaps 40.

I find the App Store useful for downloading apps for services I have purchased elsewhere (banking, insurance, utilities, entertainment), I have only one paid app from the store, AdGuard.

The App Store has its uses. I would never shop it like a store, I don't look at it as a place to find and buy products, but the place where the people I have bought products from distribute software to connect with them.

The App Store has a use case for me, but 99.99% of the stuff on offer it pure unadulterated, worthless, crap.
 
A fair questions fairly asked. I mostly use 1st party apps. I don't play games on my phone. I download my banking apps and apps like ecobee to control my thermostat (although I wish I could connect it to home kit without using the ecobee app), banking apps etc are from the store, I use MS Office which I pay for outside of the App Store and use the App Store to download. I don't do Facebook et al. All the apps on my phone fit on one screen with a few folders. I don't have hundreds of apps, perhaps 40.

I find the App Store useful for downloading apps for services I have purchased elsewhere (banking, insurance, utilities, entertainment), I have only one paid app from the store, AdGuard.

The App Store has its uses. I would never shop it like a store, I don't look at it as a place to find and buy products, but the place where the people I have bought products from distribute software to connect with them.

The App Store has a use case for me, but 99.99% of the stuff on offer it pure unadulterated, worthless, crap.
I actually wonder how many people actually use the AppStore to find useful things. If I actually want to find things I must look at third party websites for whatever category I’m looking for
 
I actually wonder how many people actually use the AppStore to find useful things. If I actually want to find things I must look at third party websites for whatever category I’m looking for
I’d guess that a majority of the downloads from the App Store are from marketing efforts outside the store. It’s just SO much easier to find actual comparative reviews and more in depth videos via YouTube.
 
I'll just leave this here. This is an app PAYING Apple to advertise that came up when I searched for 1Password ?



CDD8F464-3A02-4E9B-A92F-DC9DBF2B2316_1_201_a.jpeg
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.