This angers me so much. I use it all the time on my iPad. I am one of many!!! ?
And they'll be loosing it soon enough (ad $) as their getting competition.Money, money, money.
or even just a native ipad app for whatsapp, then I might start using it more frequentlyWhatsApp on Apple Watch, please!
‘Awful’ might be overstating it, but they certainly are smaller images intended to be viewed on small screens, and you see the limits of that on the web.I don't use instagram. Do the photos look awful on computer screens? Or is this less of a storage problem, and more of a bandwidth thing?
Apple with the calculator app ?
Yeah... having to pay for an alternative to instagram is going to make an alternative dead in the water. I'd save your money and cancel now.No Instagram for iPad has always seemed like such an oddity. I guess there are four main possible justifications
1) not enough people want it (which I find hard to believe)
2) FB/Meta finds it easier to do the data collection they want on your phone (easy to believe)
3) the resizing and compressing of photos on Insta is so aggressive that the photos would look really crappy on iPad, and they aren’t ready to pay for the extra server costs to allow for high res photos (easy to believe)
4) Insta has such a messy backend and a janky app with so much technical debt that rewriting it for a larger screen would require a whole new app (not really sure, but c’mon, Meta have the resources to do this if they wanted).
In the meantime, I’m glad that Glass - a non-tracking, non-algorithmic alternative to Insta - just launched its iPad app. I like it and I hope it catches on, but I’m doubtful given the general hostility towards subscriptions.
I doubt it's as easy as it sounds. It's not just creating it, it's maintenance, support, bug fixes, etc. They'd be doubling their work for probably very little reward. It's a small but vocal (and I think mostly older) minority of folks who keep asking for this. It'd be nice, but I honestly can't blame them for not doing it.Small indie company. No seriously, creating an iPad app shouldn’t be that difficult, even if it’s just a scaled up version.
It's not really a pure photo sharing platform in the way that something like Flickr is. It's a social media platform with a strong photo component. You scroll though your feed and see whatever your friends are posting, which these days is mostly memes or snapshots of whatever is going on in their life. It's definitely used much more by younger people (millennials and teens) than by older folks.I really don’t understand instagram’s popularity? I tried it once when someone shared with me photos on it. Couldn’t believe that as a photo sharing platform I couldn’t zoom in (without it snapping back) or flick left/right to go to the next photo! Haven’t touched it since. I know the young people don’t use it, so is it mainly a middle aged people thing?
Because they don’t want to lose people to using iPad only. Thus removing their geo tracking for advertising.
Oddly enough IG has rolled-out a time use limitation yet I think it's only for those 13 and under (to be honest NO 13yr old should be using IG ... so much negative impact on serotonin and other chemicals that basically alter the brain of youth far too intensely than adults. At least some major supervision by parents and a rull week paired use rundown and big conversation between youth and parents how the youths feelings are after each day.That, and probably their research shows that keeping people on iPhone provides more use time. To these companies the amount of eyeball time is everything.
Funnily enough, “casual” use can amount to more time than focused use.
Uh... not anymore. It used to be, but now they went all-in with the reels, video and shopping stuff.It's not really a pure photo sharing platform in the way that something like Flickr is. It's a social media platform with a strong photo component. (...)