Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It’s funny. Instagram says “we’ve gotten requests for an iPad app, but we don’t think many people want one”. The fact that people are motivated enough to ask for one shows that there’s demand for one.
 
It's odd, an iPad version is not that much more work than an iPhone version. It probably would cost less to make/maintain than maintaining one Android variant...unless they screwed up somehow and hard-coded all the screen sizes into their libraries.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kc9hzn
Meta hasn't even paid attention to its iPad app in the last 3+ years. Why would they bother with Instagram?

You'd think at the very least, they could half-ass it, and just give a full-screen experience to iPad.
 
Well, they are working on the metaverse now and will soon get into the metaverse and leave us forever
 
I don't use instagram. Do the photos look awful on computer screens? Or is this less of a storage problem, and more of a bandwidth thing?
‘Awful’ might be overstating it, but they certainly are smaller images intended to be viewed on small screens, and you see the limits of that on the web.

My sense is that is this was mostly fine for phone photography until around 2018/2019, but as cameras have got better, Insta hasn’t kept pace. I imagine it’s both storage and bandwidth - it’s serious money when you operate at the scale of insta.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kc9hzn
Instagram already has a competent web app on iPad... they just need to wrap it properly and give it notifications and it would be great...
 
No Instagram for iPad has always seemed like such an oddity. I guess there are four main possible justifications

1) not enough people want it (which I find hard to believe)
2) FB/Meta finds it easier to do the data collection they want on your phone (easy to believe)
3) the resizing and compressing of photos on Insta is so aggressive that the photos would look really crappy on iPad, and they aren’t ready to pay for the extra server costs to allow for high res photos (easy to believe)
4) Insta has such a messy backend and a janky app with so much technical debt that rewriting it for a larger screen would require a whole new app (not really sure, but c’mon, Meta have the resources to do this if they wanted).

In the meantime, I’m glad that Glass - a non-tracking, non-algorithmic alternative to Insta - just launched its iPad app. I like it and I hope it catches on, but I’m doubtful given the general hostility towards subscriptions.
Yeah... having to pay for an alternative to instagram is going to make an alternative dead in the water. I'd save your money and cancel now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DanteHicks79
1. Instagram has a website; the quality of the images wouldn't look any crappier on an iPad than they currently do in Chrome on a 4K flat panel. Image quality is not their primary concern.
2. Not every iPad is wifi-only. In fact, I'm pretty sure a large contingent of people (especially photographers) opt for a cellular iPad. Meta could still pull plenty of geo-tagged data from those users for advert purposes. And regardless, anybody who has an iPad likely also has a phone - and probably accesses Meta content on their phone, as well. Meta is still getting their marketing data either way.
3. "We get this request a lot" - "not enough interest" - way to trip on your own two feet, moron.
 
Dumb excuse, I'd think looking at pictures is a higher % of the use case of the iPad than either an iPhone (too small) or Mac (too complex, less portable). The iPad is the best device to look at pictures on.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: mnsportsgeek
Small indie company. No seriously, creating an iPad app shouldn’t be that difficult, even if it’s just a scaled up version.
I doubt it's as easy as it sounds. It's not just creating it, it's maintenance, support, bug fixes, etc. They'd be doubling their work for probably very little reward. It's a small but vocal (and I think mostly older) minority of folks who keep asking for this. It'd be nice, but I honestly can't blame them for not doing it.
 
I really don't understand this. Firstly it is not complicated to make an app for the iPad so this is nothing more than a lie.

So it is politics. If this is politics then they must balance their loss be excluding iPad users against some other benefit but I don't know what that benefit is.

Lastly I don't understand why anyone wants to use Instagram it is an awful platform where only those that are prepared to sign up to can view the content. Why bother? I don't know because I am not a member of Instagram am I missing something?
 
I really don’t understand instagram’s popularity? I tried it once when someone shared with me photos on it. Couldn’t believe that as a photo sharing platform I couldn’t zoom in (without it snapping back) or flick left/right to go to the next photo! Haven’t touched it since. I know the young people don’t use it, so is it mainly a middle aged people thing?
It's not really a pure photo sharing platform in the way that something like Flickr is. It's a social media platform with a strong photo component. You scroll though your feed and see whatever your friends are posting, which these days is mostly memes or snapshots of whatever is going on in their life. It's definitely used much more by younger people (millennials and teens) than by older folks.
 
Because they don’t want to lose people to using iPad only. Thus removing their geo tracking for advertising.

That, and probably their research shows that keeping people on iPhone provides more use time. To these companies the amount of eyeball time is everything.

Funnily enough, “casual” use can amount to more time than focused use.
Oddly enough IG has rolled-out a time use limitation yet I think it's only for those 13 and under (to be honest NO 13yr old should be using IG ... so much negative impact on serotonin and other chemicals that basically alter the brain of youth far too intensely than adults. At least some major supervision by parents and a rull week paired use rundown and big conversation between youth and parents how the youths feelings are after each day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kc9hzn
It's not really a pure photo sharing platform in the way that something like Flickr is. It's a social media platform with a strong photo component. (...)
Uh... not anymore. It used to be, but now they went all-in with the reels, video and shopping stuff.
Photography has no relevance in Instagram anymore, and they admit it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DeepIn2U
Honestly, Facebook is the most shytty, incoherent and ridiculous company out there regarding software development logic.

The iPhone app of Facebook has dark mode. The iPad version hasn't.
Facebook Messenger is available for iPad, with dark mode, but there is no WhatsApp version.
Instagram is present on iPhone but not iPad.

THAT'S FACEBOOK LOGIC!

Plus, every time they launch a new version the Facebook app for iPhone, we can expect design changes. There's not one single version where they don't mess up and change things around.

At this point I don't even want to think about the real reason why they don't want to make an iPad version of Instagram. I just want them to die quickly, go way, and leave our lives alone. And yes, I admit I still have an Instagram account because it's the only way to share (and get feedback) pics with friends. And I still have a Facebook account to connect with friends and family. But I strongly hope a good alternative will emerge sooner or later...
 
  • Like
Reactions: DeepIn2U
The IG experience on iPad has improved quite a bit since a few years ago. Fonts are much cleaner now, etc. At this point, I would rather IG find a way to support HDR photos and videos. I think that would be a pretty big deal. iPhone HDR photos look amazing but often look strange when flattened to SDR. Just my .02.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.