Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Intel Announces 'Sandy Bridge' Core Processors

MacRumors

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster



014713-sb-block-diagram_500.jpg


Today, Intel announced their next generation processor architecture known as "Sandy Bridge" (or 2nd Generation Core processor). The new processors are built on the 32nm process and integrate the processor, memory controller and graphics on the same die. In particular the new integrated graphics performance is significantly improved over previous Intel's previous chips.

TechReport summarizes the changes:
Sandy Bridge is, essentially, a next-generation replacement for Intel's primary CPUs for desktops and laptops .... At the heart of Sandy Bridge is an essentially new processor microarchitecture, the most sweeping architectural transition from Intel since the introduction of the star-crossed Pentium 4. Nearly everything has changed, from the branch predictors through the out-of-order execution engine and into the memory subsystem. The goal: to achieve higher performance and power efficiency, even on single-threaded tasks, where the integration of multiple CPU cores hasn't been much help.
Click to expand...
Anandtech in particular notes that the new processor architecture is a major step forward for laptops, significantly closing the price/performance gap between desktops and laptops.

Also promising for Mac users is that they found the graphics performance generally exceeded that found in the NVIDIA 320M that is presently used in the MacBook and MacBook Airs:
Again, Sandy Bridge delivers playable performance in every single title at 768p and “Low” detail settings. What’s more, it actually surpasses the GeForce 320M in Apple’s MacBook Pro 13 in five out of six games (the exception being STALKER).
Click to expand...
Intel's previously poor integrated graphics performance was seen as one of the reasons why Apple has stuck with pairing of previous generation Intel processors and NVIDIA 320M GPUs.

Overall, Anandtech is impressed with the performance and battery life of the new chips:
Not only do we get 50 to 100% better performance than the previous generation high-end Intel mobile chips, but we also get more than double the integrated graphics performance and battery life in most situations should be similar to Arrandale, if not better. And that’s looking at the quad-core offerings!
Click to expand...
Meanwhile, dual core and low-power versions of Sandy Bridge processors are expected to arrive next month.

Article Link: Intel Announces 'Sandy Bridge' Core Processors
 
Article Link
https://www.macrumors.com/2011/01/03/intel-announces-sandy-bridge-core-processors/
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C134 Safari/6533.18.5)

This will make the next MacBook very sweet!!!
 
MacRumors said:
Also promising for Mac users is that they found the graphics performance generally exceeded that found in the NVIDIA 320M that is presently used in the MacBook and MacBook Airs:Intel's previously poor integrated graphics performance was seen as one of the reasons why Apple has stuck with pairing of previous generation Intel processors and NVIDIA 320M GPUs.
Click to expand...

I'll believe it when I see it.
 
Also, major shocker! Like a single person reading this didn't see this coming.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Maven1975 said:
Apple better not skip on the dedicated GPU in the 13 refresh!
Click to expand...

They absolutely will. Unless they nix the hard drive bay in favor of the blade SSDs, don't expect dedicated GPUs in either 13" model. Furthermore, unless they nix the hard drive bay in favor of the blade SSDs in the 13" Pro (towards being able to finally have a discrete GPU in that model), that model is dead in the water.

maclancer said:
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C134 Safari/6533.18.5)

This will make the next MacBook very sweet!!!
Click to expand...

...if the IGP doesn't suck.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The grass always appears greener. I buy a new MBP at each processor change and have yet to be blown away by a huge performance increase. It will be an improvement, but nothing like it appears.
 
asdf542 said:
Did you read the article? Intel's IGP beats out the 320M in 5 of the 6 games they tested.

Fantastic work from Intel.
Click to expand...

Have you ever used an Intel IGP? They all suck. Hence my appropriate skepticism, even at the article citing its tests with its 5 out of 6 games.
 
Yebubbleman said:
Have you ever used an Intel IGP? They all suck. Hence my appropriate skepticism, even at the article citing its tests with its 5 out of 6 games.
Click to expand...

No reason to be skeptical when the benchmarks are already out and it's been proven not to suck. 🙄
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back