and Apple needs an Atom netbook.
otherwise they will miss it and their growth will stall completely in the next year.
My Dell netbook with a 1.6ghz Atom and GMA 950 runs OS X surprisingly well.
I'm so excited about the Atom processor that I'm hoping Apple scraps the Xeon in the Mac Pro and replaces it with the Atom.
I thought the Xeon was great, but if Apple says the Atom is all I need then that must be all I need.
I'm so excited about the Atom processor that I'm hoping Apple scraps the Xeon in the Mac Pro and replaces it with the Atom.
I thought the Xeon was great, but if Apple says the Atom is all I need then that must be all I need.
Netbooks take toll on Apple
http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2009/01/15/netbooks-take-a-toll-on-apple.aspx
sums up Apple's problem nicely...
A mac mini needs to be $399
and Apple needs an Atom netbook.
otherwise they will miss it and their growth will stall completely in the next year.
maybe use of prositues rises by 12% per year so Apple should produce an iHo?
I don't see Apple using Atom at all in the Macmini.
They could use the same core duo 2 and just give it the 9400 and it would be a better upgrade.
Atom will be for a newer Apple TV or something else. Maybe that rumored home server.
oh dear someone needs a wake up call.
That's like telling Ferrari and Lamborgini to replace the V12 in their sportscars with 4 cylinder turbos. Sure it would work, but no-were as good.
I agree, but many that buy a Mac Mini would be happy enough with Apple's software at the get go. I could see Apple rev'ing all the OSX shipped apps (QuickTime, Safari, Preview, Finder CoverFlow, etc) to take advantage of OpenCL or at least the ones that would need to take advantage. iLife and iWork could be rev'd for Snow Leopard as well come the Mac Mini's release.
It would be TOO GOOD an upgrade - and hurt iMac and Macbook sales.
They keep their entry level computer, it still works great for most people, but if you need to do more, you have to move up the line. Sounds great for Apple and AAPL! Customer semi-loses. That is always the Apple/AAPL way.
Still don't see them using Atom. How would Garageband and iMovie run on it? iLife would run like crap. Anything outside of Safari and Mail would run terrible. Well video playback would be fine, but thats why I see Atom for Apple TV.
also Apple has no interest in the already saturated netbook market so whats the issue?
What makes you think that it would be slower? Do you think that the CPU is the only thing that determines the performance of the system? Using the Ion, the mini would have a lot faster GPU than it currently does. And the CPU-performance is acceptable for most tasks, especially with the newer Atom-models Intel will soon release.
You FAR too optimistic about the potential of OpenCL. Please read about it first before you make assumptions like these.
Offloading taks to the GPU CAN and WILL accelerate a few certain tasks, mainly de/encoding or video/audio processing. For the vast majority of tasks, it won't do anything. There is a reason why a computer is still based on a multipurpose processor and not on a beefed-up high-MIPS DSP. GPUs have become more flexible over the years, but they are still in a completely different class, which makes it impossible to run many everyday tasks on it efficiently.
And don't forget: offloading to the GPU makes sense, if the GPU is fast. It is certainly NOT fast in an integrated chipset.
What are you talking about? What makes you think the netbook market is saturated?
Basically, the netbook market didn't even start until Sept. 2008 when Dell, Acer, & Hp started making the Atom Minibooks.
I would say that the market is just getting started and most likely will be the primary future of computing. Small powerful portable devices matched with cloud computing.
Apple needs an entry soon. Who here doesn't think that Apple could make a killer Netbook that will do for the Netbook market what the ipod did for the mp3 player market.
Apple is setting the groundwork already with Mobile Me, itunes app store, and iwork.com.
A 9", 1.4 pound, atom based, macbook mini running snow leopard for under $500.00 would be a killer device.
Even iWork would be slow.Still don't see them using Atom. How would Garageband and iMovie run on it? iLife would run like crap. Anything outside of Safari and Mail would run terrible. Well video playback would be fine, but thats why I see Atom for Apple TV.
Anyone know if the CPU in my MBP is soldered in?
Does Atom use the same socket as C2D?
I'm asking because I want to replace this POS 2.2 ghz C2D I currently have with one of them Atom processors.
I don't know why Intel bothers to make anything else...
If the Macbook Air costs 1799 which is meant to be the simple task notebook in the lineup. What makes you guys think Apple will release a smaller crappier notebook for under $400?![]()