Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I agree with your points and I must say that my daughter has the new M1 MacBook Air and she uses it to do a lot including play Robloxs which on my 15" Intel MacBook Pro absolutely causes the fans to kick in almost straight away not to mention the massive dive in performance yet on hers there is hardly a flutter, the machine is just better than I could have thought for a fanless laptop.
 
You must have missed a guy named Elon Musk, richest person in the world. He has as a degree In physics and understand the universe from the atoms up!
Elon is a technical founder, yes. Rare.

(Technically he bought-in and didn't found Tesla, but anyway).

Does Elon have marketing skills? In a somewhat unorthodox way, sure.

As I said. Engineering + Marketing is rare.
 
When did Jobs tell Intel this? We know for a fact:

1. The AIM Alliance (Apple, IBM, and Motorola) and especially the I part of that could not develop G5's for a laptop that wouldn't melt the ice caps due to power consumption and heat dissipation.

2. The G4 was just not strong enough anymore, already softly hit the limits of the chip, and then severely hit those limits around the time of the Mactel switch.

3. The reason for the big switch to Mactels was exactly about those items you mentioned above. Apple's mantra since the Intel switch was "faster, lighter, cooler."

4. Intel, and especially its Apple contract, stagnated to such a point that an iPad Pro was legitimately more powerful than an Intel MacBook or MacBook Air. Possibly/Probably even stronger than a 13 inch MacBook Pro. And all while not making enough heat to rival the planet Venus and using lower power consumption.

So when did Jobs specifically tell Intel, "You need to do more with X and YOU WILL SERIOUSLY REGRET IT IF YOU DO NOT DO MORE WITH X." That exact type of quote was said during the great debate over CodeWarrior vs XCode.
Jobs did not say it in that way but he said that performance per watt was very important and it is right there in an Apple keynote event if you care to do some basic research. I will not give you the answer.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: 708692
Compared to what they were, it's laughable. They largely deserve it though, I've never seen a company rest on it's laurels and watch everyone else blaze past them. I used to live in Waterloo, Ontario too, and I can tell you that the lazy mentality went beyond execs, a lot of my friends worked at Blackberry (known as RIM at the time) and they all denied Apple and Android's superior product and still believed Blackberries were at the top... this was even a few years after the initial release of the iPhone. Everyone I know no longer works at Blackberry.

I recall RIM and a few former colleagues moved to Waterloo to work there - I live in Toronto. I even got denied a job there a year before there purchase of QNX, still in their BES 5 and BBOS days.

BB10 showed some promise but they never engaged their biggest market users: industry, real-estate, corporate markets, etc. Their worst and most lazy push was offering a useless BES upgrade to BlackBerry Fusion I think it was called, meant to administer BB10 devices which even that they couldn't get right.

Lazaridis was part of the lazy culture cultivation. At the very least with all their layoffs in masses happening, many got decent severance pay, vacation pay unpaid, and references to get stable jobs at same or similar income levels. Rogers Communications did a HUGE hiring spree as they were taking over Nortel's campus (another company that was lazy).

I pray Apple NEVER gets like that,

PS: If you're ever near Eglinton Ave E and Don Mills you'll notice the old dinosaur Celestica is just about completely gone.
Intel will be fine. They can be bought by someone else and outsource the production to TSMC or Samsung.

What people should be worried about is that is an other blow to US manufacturing. They again get their butt kicked by Asia.

Why is it important for USA to still have chip manufacturing? like honestly why?
 
Intel will be fine. They can be bought by someone else and outsource the production to TSMC or Samsung.

What people should be worried about is that is an other blow to US manufacturing. They again get their butt kicked by Asia.
Nope! Apple has bought all of TMSC 3nm production and presumably will continue to buy up all the production of any other progress so that would leave Intel behind...again!
 
Considering Intel's problems predated Swan's brief tenure as Intel CEO, I'm not sure what Gelsinger is going to be able to do to turn things around drastically enough. Certainly the alarm bells at Intel need to be going off with AMD taking the lead in x86 and other companies de-emphasizing x86-64 in favor of custom ARM64 designs.
 
Considering Intel's problems predated Swan's brief tenure as Intel CEO, I'm not sure what Gelsinger is going to be able to do to turn things around drastically enough. Certainly the alarm bells at Intel need to be going off with AMD taking the lead in x86 and other companies de-emphasizing x86-64 in favor of custom ARM64 designs.
What companies other than Apple are deemphasizing x86-64 that can actually provide support for x86-64. I love macs, but I'm not giving up my x86-64 desktop to run emulation. While rocket lake and alder lake aren't out yet, my bet is Intel will take back some of the lost ground. (anyway that's a big hypothetical)

Intel is a strong company, who will survive.
 
Well Intel couldn’t do much worse but I’m not sure VM Ware is the answer. AMD and now Apple are eating them for lunch because Intel innovation can’t keep up
 
That's what happens when you let a non-technical guy lead a technical company. Same damage done by Tim Cook to Apple.
 
It is no surprise that Bob Swan and Tim Cook will be stepping down due to lack of visionary product strategy for the company.

Why are the customers still using an old generation of magic keyboard after the catastrophic failure of the butterfly keyboard mechanism?
 
It is no surprise that Bob Swan and Tim Cook will be stepping down due to lack of visionary product strategy for the company.

Why are the customers still using an old generation of magic keyboard after the catastrophic failure of the butterfly keyboard mechanism?

So you think that magic keyboards has something to do with visionary product strategy?

Whereas the entire switch to a new architecture does not?
 
So unfortunate to see a company like Intel flounder year after year due to prioritizing the wrong things. The rise and fall of Intel will become a cornerstone case for management courses in business universities.

actually its very fortunate, the fact that new companies rise and others fall mean that the business is healthy and competition exists all in favour of the consumer. No need for 1 company to control the lives of everyone. More competition = better economy and production.
 
actually its very fortunate, the fact that new companies rise and others fall mean that the business is healthy and competition exists all in favour of the consumer. No need for 1 company to control the lives of everyone. More competition = better economy and production.
As an AMD and Apple fan, I totally agree ;) Only point was that it's interesting how the mighty can fall.
 
The CEO was the CFO? Well, that explains it all right there. Beancounters rarely can run companies anywhere except into the ground, history has shown that time and time again. They just don't have the right mindset to do it. Their mindset works well to cut costs and reduce expenses, but you don't want that guy deciding the course of your business, or you'll end up spending little into obsolescence.
 
Nothing screams success and innovation like outsourcing your fab for 5 nm and 3 nm.
Intel has been outsourcing some products to TSMC for a long time (for example, their FPGMs). The only difference now is that Intel is outsourcing some of their cheaper (i3) Core processors. That's not to say that Intel is not having problems with their manufacturing process. Still, keep the things in the proper perspective.
 
Well Intel couldn’t do much worse but I’m not sure VM Ware is the answer. AMD and now Apple are eating them for lunch because Intel innovation can’t keep up
The new CEO started working for Intel at the age of 18 and worked there for 30 years. He was the first Intel CTO.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.