merom price differential
Yes, Intel has been pushing prices down aggressively to fight AMD. They seem to have been pricing their dual-core P4 chips lower than anyone suspected too.
I don't see this as being about how cheap Merom will be though. It's about what price Core Duo will fall to. It's also about supply chain and market perceptions.
I understand the point about the Core Duo in the Macbook but in reality.. the price differential between a low end core duo and a core solo isn't as large as the difference in the Core Duo line between the low end and the top tier parts. In other words, there wouldn't be that much of a difference in price and it positions the recently released macbook to be the younger sibling of a revised Core2 MacBook Pro. I'm looking at it as leapfrog. If the macbook and the macbook pro had been released simultaneously we'd have likely seen the core solo in the macbook. Since it came out just recently, the duo made more sense.
JMHO of course. I think there is an economical reason for a yonah and a conroe but there is also a marketing issue. There is a balancing act between making a new product obsolete proof to have enough value and putting in too much or too little cpu. With Intel pushing the release schedules, Apple may have decided to go dual core 32bit on the low end if only because they didn't want the macbook to look hopelessly out of date in 3 months. Apple certainly doesn't have a history of frequent product line changes.
Yes, Intel has been pushing prices down aggressively to fight AMD. They seem to have been pricing their dual-core P4 chips lower than anyone suspected too.
I don't see this as being about how cheap Merom will be though. It's about what price Core Duo will fall to. It's also about supply chain and market perceptions.
I understand the point about the Core Duo in the Macbook but in reality.. the price differential between a low end core duo and a core solo isn't as large as the difference in the Core Duo line between the low end and the top tier parts. In other words, there wouldn't be that much of a difference in price and it positions the recently released macbook to be the younger sibling of a revised Core2 MacBook Pro. I'm looking at it as leapfrog. If the macbook and the macbook pro had been released simultaneously we'd have likely seen the core solo in the macbook. Since it came out just recently, the duo made more sense.
JMHO of course. I think there is an economical reason for a yonah and a conroe but there is also a marketing issue. There is a balancing act between making a new product obsolete proof to have enough value and putting in too much or too little cpu. With Intel pushing the release schedules, Apple may have decided to go dual core 32bit on the low end if only because they didn't want the macbook to look hopelessly out of date in 3 months. Apple certainly doesn't have a history of frequent product line changes.