Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Off-topic, but by any chance does someone know what type of camera is pictured in the article photo?
 
This sounds pretty cool but I wonder how efficient these kind of systems are. What would something like this do to my electricity bill?
 
So rather than a cable when out and about I have to carry a charging matt!

Let's be honest it's not going to be better having wireless charging unless it's adopted everywhere and that will never happen. I can see uses such as mouse from a laptop or keyboard from a tablet or to compliment wires such as a coffee table or bedside table that charges in the office.

Starbucks should have it in the tables but you gotta keep the wires?!
 
Shoot!

*****! I was just about to get over longing for Broadwell. Now I have to start lusting after Skylake!
 
I've been following advancements in solar for some time now, when you take away government subsidies to the fossil fuel industry solar itself (not mentioning other alternative energies) is already at cost parity. That means that a revolution is at hand ;)

Perhaps. Perhaps not -- when you include soft costs, which are currently the biggest source of costs. http://www1.eere.energy.gov/solar/sunshot/news_detail.html?news_id=21115

Regardless, the biggest barrier to solar isn't costs. The biggest barrier is consistency, because in the utility industry, consistency is king. There is nothing more important than always keeping the lights on.

With a coal, NG, or nuclear fired plant, you can plan exactly how much power is generated -- no more, no less.

With solar, you never know for sure how much you're going to get, and you can't control it, turning it up and down.

For that reason, solar is much more expensive, because you have to install a much higher capacity in order to meet demand.

The way to counteract that is by using energy storage technology (batteries!). Unfortunately, the state of energy storage (in relation to what would be needed) is laughable. That is the achilles heel of solar.

Does solar have a place in our energy future? Absolutely. I'm not saying it's useless by any stretch. But let's make sure we're upfront about both its strengths and weaknesses.


Also ... a revolution isn't exactly at hand with the FF subsidies still in place... and good luck getting those repealed!
 
I've been following advancements in solar for some time now, when you take away government subsidies to the fossil fuel industry solar itself (not mentioning other alternative energies) is already at cost parity. That means that a revolution is at hand ;)

Only sort of. I agree that the subsidy issue could bring parity from a cost perspective. However, you need the initial investment and the space to install the solar panels -- Just look at how many acres it took apple to power their data centers. Obviously to power a house requires less, but the cost to install plus the capacity to store the energy until needed (like at night) is significant. The cost alone will keep people from switching for some time. I think that commercial properties will make the switch sooner (like Apple), but home owner, for whom this Skylake is intended for, will take a lot longer to adopt. I already have a solar water heater on my roof and I can tell you that the neighbors weren't happy, the initial outlay (even with credits) was significant, and the ROI has not been as great as espected.
 
The rule at my house is you do not use a portable device when plugged in. All it does it ruin cables. And besides, the Low Battery indicator is a good indicator it's time to do something besides play video games.

Better rule: if a stupid Apple cable gets damaged because you're using it while plugged in, march into the Apple store and ask for a free replacement. I have, several times. Those cords are BS and Apple knows it.
 
Only sort of. I agree that the subsidy issue could bring parity from a cost perspective. However, you need the initial investment and the space to install the solar panels -- Just look at how many acres it took apple to power their data centers. Obviously to power a house requires less, but the cost to install plus the capacity to store the energy until needed (like at night) is significant. The cost alone will keep people from switching for some time. I think that commercial properties will make the switch sooner (like Apple), but home owner, for whom this Skylake is intended for, will take a lot longer to adopt. I already have a solar water heater on my roof and I can tell you that the neighbors weren't happy, the initial outlay (even with credits) was significant, and the ROI has not been as great as espected.

Wow, your neighbors really had an issue with a solar collector? Personally I'd be congratulating them.
 
Apple makes a lot of money with their cables and power adapters. I'm sure they will take their time adopting this.

God, what a retarded statement.
Did Apple keep music off the iPhone to protect its iPod business?
Did they delay AirPlay to protect the "iPhone to TV cable" business?

If Apple delays implementing this, it will be because the existing technology sucks in some way, not because they're desperate to hold on to a business that's far far smaller than the iPod business ever was.
 
Off-topic, but by any chance does someone know what type of camera is pictured in the article photo?

Hi toanavinai

That camera is a Fuji 'X-E1', coupled with the 'XF 35mm 1.4' Fuji lense.
It has been replaced by the 'X-E2', which I own, and looks identical with updated internals/functions (such as wifi which is what allows to identify this is an X-E1 - no mention of wifi on the top). Also they photoshopped the 'Fujifilm' engraving on the left part of the camera.

These are great little cameras (X series) with amazing lenses.

Cheers
 
Right!

Am I the only one who feels that all this wireless radiation or whatever passing through our bodies is going to kill (at least some of) us?

I haven't looked up the science, but it often backpedals as new data trickles in too...

Exactly. It sure will at least add something to the existing amount of radiation. Cellular, Wi-Fi, microwaves, there're already a lot of various sources.
 
I don't think Apple is going to implement anything that requires installing power mats or other accessories throughout your home. Your devices will charge each other off a desktop.

Image

http://www.patentlyapple.com/patent...le-nails-future-wireless-charging-system.html

Powermats and the like are just the players in the industry releasing a bunch of "me too" products when witricity has been doing this for years. I feel Apple's implementation (and Samsung has a very similar vision) makes more sense.

----------



No, it's magnetic coupling.
ok. The diagram you posted makes more sense to me.
 
*****! I was just about to get over longing for Broadwell. Now I have to start lusting after Skylake!

SkyLake is going to introduce so many new things, SATA Express, DDR4, WiGig, Wireless Charging, not to mention a completely new architecture. Not sure if 3G/LTE and GPS support will come with Broadwell or SkyLake.

You should wait for Cannonlake, or it's die-shink model if you want a matured technology though.
 
Sounds interesting but I wonder if it would be unsafe for anyone with a pacemaker or defibrillator.

I'm usually rational and scientific about these kinda of things, but I have to say, "50 GHz magnetic resonance" just sounds dangerous - or at least untested health-wise. I can't help but wonder if future generations will look on our unbridled use of the electromagnetic spectrum like we view Mad Men's chainsmoking physicians.
 
What about those of us who don't want to be further bombarded with wireless EMFs?
Apple had better be very careful here
 
What about those of us who don't want to be further bombarded with wireless EMFs?
Apple had better be very careful here

If you don't want it, don't buy it. The RF output would be sufficiently low enough that if your neighbors used it, it should not affect you.
 
This is cool, and I can't wait. I think we're fast approaching the time and technology to make this not only feasible but quite viable. We're nearly there anyways with wireless keyboards and mice.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.