I think the HD 3000 and HD 4000 support also Turbo Boost 1.0 or 2.0. So the speed depends on your tasks. The HD 4000 is certainly better, because this IGP supports realtime decoding/encoding of 1080p H.264 material (AirPlay) and supports OpenCL.Which is better?
HD4000 ich much faster. It is faster than the dedicated 9600M GT used in older MBP and should be on-par or faster than the 330M
source?
HD4000 ich much faster. It is faster than the dedicated 9600M GT used in older MBP and should be on-par or faster than the 330M
Is the intel 4000 good enough for photoshop editing?
Source please
edit: let me check those links you posted. I always post too quick lol
I believe there is an hd4000 and hd4000m right? The macs use the m variant
Photoshop editing is most time a CPU question, not GPU.Is the intel 4000 good enough for photoshop editing?
Well, you could look up notebookcheck: http://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-HD-Graphics-4000.69168.0.html
Also: http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu_list.php
Also see the benchmarks here: http://www.anandtech.com/show/5872/intel-dual-core-ivy-bridge-launch-and-ultrabook-review/4
Note that ULV Ivy Bridge seems to have some performance problems due to throttling, so the Air IGP performance would be lower than the MBP's.
just looked it up and wow. cant believe intergrated gfx has gone up that much to be on par with 330gt. i have a mid 2010 17 in macbook pro with the 512mb 330gt and its kind of mind blowing cus i still play a lot of games with no problems
Is the intel 4000 good enough for photoshop editing?
Crazy, right? I knew that performance of integrated chips moved on, but it was a real shocker to realize that the new MBA is actually almost twice (both CPU and GPU-wise) as fast as my 2.5 year of top of the line MBP (which cost around 2500 back then).
Well, you could look up notebookcheck: http://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-HD-Graphics-4000.69168.0.html
Also: http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu_list.php
Also see the benchmarks here: http://www.anandtech.com/show/5872/intel-dual-core-ivy-bridge-launch-and-ultrabook-review/4
Note that ULV Ivy Bridge seems to have some performance problems due to throttling, so the Air IGP performance would be lower than the MBP's.
You're not comparing Apples to...well Apple's here.
The only way to get a reliable benchmark is to compare Mac to Mac.
Look at the variance in the HD 4000 results. Take 3Dmark06 for example:
HD4000 4324-7159
320m 3824-4754
At worst, the HD4000 could be WORSE than the 320m.
I very much doubt this, but it's not impossible.
You don't know where the Macbook pro falls within that range of HD4000 benchmarks, so you can't even guess at how much faster it is.
You're not comparing Apples to...well Apple's here.
The only way to get a reliable benchmark is to compare Mac to Mac.
Look at the variance in the HD 4000 results. Take 3Dmark06 for example:
HD4000 4324-7159
320m 3824-4754
At worst, the HD4000 could be WORSE than the 320m.
I very much doubt this, but it's not impossible.
You don't know where the Macbook pro falls within that range of HD4000 benchmarks, so you can't even guess at how much faster it is.
and you are using a 6 year old benchmark. use vantage or unique heaven engine
You also have to pay attention to what system is using it, if its a quad>dual core> ulv they will have different clocks
integrated graphics will never be as good as dedicated graphics as it uses shared system memory...
I stand by dedicated graphics to be much better and especially not a fan of Intel's integrated graphics ! 320 is better.