2009...Just in time for all that beautiful spectrum to be opened up by the FCC.![]()
Big thumbs up on that comment.
Best one of the thread.
Mmmm.... high speed anyware access. (real high speed. not this edge/3g slow poke stuff.)
2009...Just in time for all that beautiful spectrum to be opened up by the FCC.![]()
I don't see why not, it does "run OS X" after all...so if the iPhone gets officially opened to 3rd party apps, does this mean something similar to Universal Binaries for the iPhone?
If so this would be great, as developers could design for all Apple Phones at the same time, and older models would not get left in the dust to quickly.
Like the Samsung ARM processor currently used, Moorestown is a system-on-chip design
For me this is the main reason Apple is not allowing 3P apps, switching to new hardware is much easier now and no legacy code to support.
I beleive the speculation is that Apple have avoided opening up the iPhone so they will not have to support legacy apps when they switch to the intel platform.
I think it is simpler than that. Apple rushed the iPhone out the door. Sure thay has a bunch on interesting tech, but not as a choerent product. They had to pull developers off Leopard to hit their launch date - and even then there appear to be issues with ill-conceived features and functionality (some of which got fixed in the update). The simple answer to the question of why there is no dev kit for the iPhone/iTouch platform (aside from AJAX web apps)? Apple just didn't have the time to mess with anything but the bare essentials.
It will be Bootcamp all over again. Lots of third party hacking about, then suddenly Bam! iPhone Dev Kit at 2008 (or 2009) dev con.
Apple products "Just work". Problem is the new iPhone/iPod Touch platform "Only just works". It needs time to bed in and have Apple polish it some more.
I take it you have not used any other smart phone before. The iPhone interface is BLAZING fast and extremely slick compared to others. Try a Windows Mobile device, I dare you.I think this is a great move. the ARM processor is too slow anyway for today's iPHone.
Just scroll through a song list in the iTunes store, the sluggish FPS is annoying..
that, and the photo viewer will then finally be able to process full rez photos as opposed to the jacked up low resolution that iTunes "optimizes" them to before copying them to the iPHone.
Talk about putting all of your eggs into one basket. Would it be a good thing for Apple to rely on only one chip manufacturer? I suppose it would make it easier for the company to write code for a single, consistent platform (other than something additional, like ARM) but......
I don't see the benefit. Applications you write for Mac OS X aren't suddenly going to work on the iPhone because the devices use the same chipset. It's a separate platform no matter how you slice it.Now they have to support G4/G5, ARM and Intell. Not that it apparently is a enormoust task,but still, it would be a benefit.
Dependence on PPC and IBM/Motorola is much different. IBM and Motorola are much more diversified companies and the PPC platform was not their bread and butter. It got neglected and fell behind Intel and AMD by a fair margin before Apple finally woke up and realized their was no future with PPC.I think that would be sweet. However, should Apple put too much dependence on one chip maker? We saw what happened in the PPC days.
But it took the iMac years to get to Intel!
It will be interesting to see if Intel can beat the 2009 time frame.
The 2008 Christmas buying season is a huge motivation for them and it's hard to believe that they won't beat their schedule in order to take advantage of it.
Awesome!
Now this is a good rumor.
I bet this will be a 3rd gen iphone though. Anyone holding out for this one might have to wait a while.
Prob. one more "big iphone arm" upgrade in between IMO.
I beleive the speculation is that Apple have avoided opening up the iPhone so they will not have to support legacy apps when they switch to the intel platform.
I think it is simpler than that. Apple rushed the iPhone out the door. Sure thay has a bunch on interesting tech, but not as a choerent product. They had to pull developers off Leopard to hit their launch date - and even then there appear to be issues with ill-conceived features and functionality (some of which got fixed in the update). The simple answer to the question of why there is no dev kit for the iPhone/iTouch platform (aside from AJAX web apps)? Apple just didn't have the time to mess with anything but the bare essentials.
It will be Bootcamp all over again. Lots of third party hacking about, then suddenly Bam! iPhone Dev Kit at 2008 (or 2009) dev con.
Apple products "Just work". Problem is the new iPhone/iPod Touch platform "Only just works". It needs time to bed in and have Apple polish it some more.
Weird... 4 posts in a row.![]()
Remember US contracts are 24 months, it kinda makes sense that Apple would release the 2nd Gen iPhone just before everyone's contracts run out so they can get a new one.
Ah well, I'm still waiting for Nov. to get my 1st Gen!![]()
More like iPhone 4...iphone 2.. here we come!
iphone 2.. here we come!