Ok. Specifically, I am into chess. Using Stockfish 13 which is the strongest engine available. The M1 is about on par with a 1 year old base Intel I7 but gets beat easily by the most recent I9 (nowhere near 6 times tough, not for chess). Going from 8 to 16 cores would enable it to leap over Intel, at least until Intel's next cpu.Data crunching? Sounds like one of those meaningless phrases used by people who like to impress others with alleged IT knowledge. Virtually every benchmark out there shows Intel stomping on the M1 by as much as 6:1. Adding a letter to the name of the CPU won't do much to close that gap.
Intel did throw Apple a bone by admitting that the M1 beat it on battery performance... by 1%.
Then again, Apple has always been a master at marketing form over function, control-freak over freedom to use your hardware any way you want. Can't argue that. That must be why Intel-powered computers still hold a huge, galloping lead on market share over Apple computers.
I thought it would be simpler to say data crunching which really is what a chess engine does.