Intel's Coffee Lake Chips Bring Significant Speed Boosts to 2019 iMacs

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
7,446
8,513



Geekbench's John Poole this afternoon shared a series of 2019 iMac benchmarks, giving us a look at the performance boosts offered by Intel's 8th and 9th-generation Coffee Lake chips.

All of the new 27-inch 5K models offer superior performance compared to their 2017 counterparts, with single-core performance up an average of 6 to 11 percent and multi-core performance up 43 to 49 percent for six-core models. The higher-end models with 3.6GHz 8-core Core i9 chip offer the biggest boost in multi-core performance, with speeds up 66 percent.


The highest-end iMac earned a single-core score of 6157 and a multi-core score of 32293, compared to the 5864/1971 single and multi-core scores of the equivalent high-end machine.


Even the base model 2019 27-inch iMac with a 3.0GHz 6-core 8th-gen chip saw notable gains, earning a single-core score of 5222 and a multi-core score of 20145, compared to the 4767/13682 scores the low-end 2017 models earned.

These chips are two years apart, so it is no surprise that even the mid-level chips are outperforming the higher-end chips from 2017.

6-core and 8-core chips in the 27-inch models are now competitive with the 2017 iMac Pro models with 8 and 10-cores. The high-end 8-core iMac offers 16 percent higher single core performance and just 10 percent lower multi-core performance than the 10-core iMac Pro.

Gains are more modest for the 21.5-inch 4K iMac models, but still significant. Single-core performance is up 5 to 10 percent, while multi-core performance has increased by 10 to 50 percent.




As Poole points out, the performance gains in the 2019 iMac models are due to higher frequencies and core counts as the underlying architecture hasn't been updated.

Poole says that while there's a significant boost when it comes to multi-core performance in the new iMacs, along with a decent boost in single-core performance, the increase isn't enough to "justify upgrading from a 2017 iMac."

Apple's newest iMac models were announced last week and have been arriving to customers this week. Aside from Intel's new 8th and 9th-generation Coffee Lake chips, Radeon Pro Vega graphics options, and faster RAM, there have been no other improvements to the 2019 iMac models.

Article Link: Intel's Coffee Lake Chips Bring Significant Speed Boosts to 2019 iMacs
 
  • Like
Reactions: jeremiah256

ondert

macrumors 6502
Aug 11, 2017
352
690
Italy
Last edited:

nawnp

macrumors newbie
Jun 7, 2017
18
24
Little rock, Ar
Glad to see the upgrades, but it seems like it has lowered the chance of the iMacs being remodeled to match the new monitor that is supposed to come out later this year, as well as a cooling design like the iMac pro.(and if it is 30+", hopefully an iMac with the same screen size comes) Maybe next year then.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jb-net

Not-Sure

Suspended
Mar 6, 2019
46
152
I have decided, for 3D rendering, video editing and everything related to graphics and video... a PC. Way faster, upgradable and way cheaper. For audio, music apps and hanging on the internet... a Mac. I have a 2014 15" MBP and works just fine with an external monitor, Logic Pro, Ableton, everything! But I am not wasting money on an iMac, not worth it.
pc.jpg
 

Glockworkorange

macrumors 68000
Feb 10, 2015
1,998
3,182
Chicago, Illinois
Glad to see the upgrades, but it seems like it has lowered the chance of the iMacs being remodeled to match the new monitor that is supposed to come out later this year, as well as a cooling design like the iMac pro.(and if it is 30+", hopefully an iMac with the same screen size comes) Maybe next year then.
I don't think we're going to get that cooling system in the regular iMacs until they go full SSD.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nawnp

Maigrais

macrumors member
Jan 25, 2012
35
59
It's no suprise that newer chips are faster than 2 year old ones. What I'm interested in is what the temperatures are. The i7 2017 iMac gets really hot with heavy use. Wit the same internal cooling solution, does the i9 throttle?
Yes this is what I am also interested in finding out. In fact, the lab results of throttling tests will directly be impactful for my purchase decision of this machine.
 

MacFather

macrumors 6502a
Mar 16, 2012
968
9,204
Couldn't care less.

No larger screens with slimmer bezels -- CHECK
No updated thermal architecture -- CHECK
No PCIe-flash across the board -- CHECK
No 16GB RAM as standard -- CHECK
No 120Hz ProMotion -- CHECK
No Face ID - CHECK
No True Tone Display -- CHECK
No 1080p Webcam -- CHECK
No Tx Security Chip -- CHECK
No Space Grey option -- CHECK
No backlit keyboard -- CHECK
Tim Cook still there -- CHECK
 
Last edited:

Jul 4, 2015
4,491
2,506
Paris
I have decided, for 3D rendering, video editing and everything related to graphics and video... a PC. Way faster, upgradable and way cheaper. For audio, music apps and hanging on the internet... a Mac. I have a 2014 15" MBP and works just fine with an external monitor, Logic Pro, Ableton, everything! But I am not wasting money on an iMac, not worth it.
View attachment 829122
Nice set up. You should think about Samsung QLED screens. Their new TVs work great for PCs and Macs and support 95% P3 color gamut. Absolutely awesome for video and CG work, massive size and cheaper than equivalent screens sold solely for PC use.
 

firewood

macrumors 604
Jul 29, 2003
7,634
869
Silicon Valley
Those Geekbench numbers are no more than 30% faster than the iPad Mini I just picked up today!
... for a fraction of the price of a new iMac (which does have, I admit, more memory, storage, and IO capability than an iPad).
 

Bboble

macrumors member
Sep 24, 2006
59
124
California
Truly innovative and embarrassing, Apple.
Six months late to the game, and, this is what you have to show for yourself!? Geekbench is actually a benchmark that doesn't highlight thermal limitations, yet, my 9900k Hackintosh puts out ~35k multicore, and ~6.3K single core on 2133MHz ram with no optimizations. Clearly, the 9900k is being held back in the iMac.

Overclocked, and with 3200MHz ram, I'm seeing ~40K multicore, and ~ 6.8k single core. This is on air, and a tight, quiet case.

Curious to see Cinebench, and all the thermal throttling! Didn't you learn from the i9 MBP, Apple? And, where is the Radeon VII for the "Pro" model?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Queen6

Icaras

macrumors 603
Mar 18, 2008
5,835
2,261
California, United States
Couldn't care less.

No larger screens with slimmer bezels -- CHECK
No updated thermal architecture -- CHECK
No PCIe-flash across the board -- CHECK
No 16GB RAM as standard -- CHECK
No 120Hz ProMotion -- CHECK
No True Tone Display -- CHECK
No 1080p Webcam -- CHECK
No Tx Security Chip -- CHECK
No Space Grey option -- CHECK
No backlit keyboard -- CHECK
Tim Cook still there -- CHECK
Love your iMac rant posts and agree with all of it! Keep it up!
 

anaudiopro

macrumors 65816
Mar 7, 2017
1,172
1,300
Typing this on my '19 i9 iMac right now. Couldn't be happier. Blazing fast, dead quiet and surprisingly cool. I find it quite humorous the amount of people taking the piss with a machine they do not have in their possession. Maybe it's jealousy, ignorance or trolling. Not sure which...?