Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
At what point are we going to level out with these chips. I know it's great we just keep getting faster and faster chips, but damn! Every week it seems something better is out, that is **% faster than before.

Every week? Seems most around here are b*tching for Apple to update their product lines despite that fact that there is no new tech from intel for apple to use until May!
 
That's nice to see though we'll be looking at Penryn based Macs with mobile variants vs. the current Merom Core 2 Duos and not the Conroe extremes. Though they did measure desktop to desktop, so it's nice to see that the Penryn outperformed the high end Conroe that well. I wonder if we will see 3.0+ghz versions of the mobile Penryns in MBs, MBPs, and iMacs...
 
Every week? Seems most around here are b*tching for Apple to update their product lines despite that fact that there is no new tech from intel for apple to use until May!

I totally agree. It seems like everyone on this board wants a new feature/faster thing every week. If that happens, they'll just turn around and complain that the computer they just got a week ago is already obsolete. Very hypocritical. Up until about April of last year, my dad used a G3 iMac he got in 1998. It served him fine until it started slowing down too much. But 1998-2006 is a long time in computer terms. If he can handle it, pretty much anyone can.
 
Meh.....my view is people should buy the current chips based on the santa rosa platform and wait for Nehalem as the next upgrade and skip Penryn all together. The numbers just aren't all that great IMHO
 
Every now and then when I hear about a new piece of high technology, which is really just an incremental upgrade, it just makes me marvel that any of this stuff even works at all! Can you imagine how small these tiny little parts are that are doing these calculations? And isn't it amazing that these calculations which do everything, like making your printer shoot ink out in a recognizable pattern, are really all done by unfathomably small charged electrons flying around in tiny little channels of material etched into incomprehensibly complex patterns?
 
My impression is that Penryn chips are expected to enter production late this year but SHIP in 2008:

http://www.infoworld.com/article/07/04/16/HNintelbeyondsantarosa_1.html

It's too late...the surge of high expectations have already started. Once the Macrumors main page says:

Penryn chips are expected to be released later in 2007.

We can be assured that come December, the lack of Penryn based Macs with be used by the whiners to indicate the "latest Apple betrayal".
 
Meh.....my view is people should buy the current chips based on the santa rosa platform and wait for Nehalem as the next upgrade and skip Penryn all together. The numbers just aren't all that great IMHO

can you give me some reasons why you feel this way???...im just wondering and if it'll take a while, could you just send me a few links...i've done a little bit of reading on the architectures, but am wondering your take.

thanx
 
Seems like PPC is still a viable option, would hate to think that Apple wouldn't have a small team keeping the dream alive.

http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9584_22-6124451.html

P6 is a beast, but it's an impressive beast. I think it would truly be overkill even for pro machines. it's got everything but the kitchen sink.

I was made painfully aware last year we don't have a relationship with apple anymore, that's pretty obvious by the current lineup.

However, if apple could get P6 into a portable, I might be impressed. :D
 
P6 is a beast, but it's an impressive beast. I think it would truly be overkill even for pro machines. it's got everything but the kitchen sink.

I was made painfully aware last year we don't have a relationship with apple anymore, that's pretty obvious by the current lineup.

However, if apple could get P6 into a portable, I might be impressed. :D

I think, just as Steve-O had the secret Intel division up and running, he would have the alternate PPC division still running. I wonder how difficult/profitable it would be to offer Intel and PPC. FOr the short term I highly, highly doubt we'll see a peep of PPC but as time goes by and Moore's Law starts taking a hit on the Intel side we may see PPC pop by for another visit.

Just my $.02.
B
 
I wish we could see these kinds of speed improvements in the HDs & CD/DVD players. :(

But, I always love a faster Mac! :D
Improvements in hard drive speed are being driven by Solid State Drives. Once price comes down and businesses show a need, then you'll see production ramp up.
 
Stephen Hawking grew an "S" on his name?

I believe its called progression :p

We will level out when the chips are so powerful they take over and zap us all into a substance very much like 2000 degree oxtail soup (according to Stephen Hawkings anyway) :p


When did Stephen Hawking grow that "S" on the end of his last name?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.