the exact same things were said about the name "macbook" and "macbook pro" when it came out.
Exactly what I was thinking when I read those comments. There have been numerous instances of people on rumor sites speaking authoritatively about a given rumor that turned out to be true. The switch to Intel was probably the biggest and best example, but there were others (iPods for Windows was another one.)
If you've been on MacRumors long enough, you can see the stages people go through. I think of it as the "dog with a bone" syndrome. People get it in their heads what should and shouldn't be, including details like product names, whether a given product can succeed, whether Apple should or shouldn't make certain things, how unlikely it is, etc., and they just won't let it go.
Then, when info leaks that contradicts those notions, they flip out, regardless of how consistent the supposed name is (and I have to say, real it or not, MacBook Air is pretty consistent with Apple's naming style, especially considering the "Air" keyword in wireless products.) And once the details are announced officially, people talk about what a mistake it is and complain about how it's not what they expected (the latter being the only real problem.) And then, there's this gradual acceptance as the dogs let go of their bones and carry on with their normal lives.
I love following rumors sites, especially before a big Apple event, but I refrain from taking a stand on these things. Apple has done it too many times before and anyone who claims with any authority to know what rumors are real or not (especially after the switch to Intel which almost everyone thought was bunk) can take a flying leap. Whatever happens will happen. Just sit down and try to enjoy the ride.
