How does one LOOSE credibility by advocating for the termination of an agency that has demonstrstraed a <50% success rate (for more than a decade)? We are paying billions to get less safety that what is afforded by the flip of a coin...
But hey 2 year olds get groped, so I guess TSA agents have that going for them, right?
I said lose not loose.
So in your theory, a 0% stop-rate is better than a 50% stop-rate? I don't know, if a seatbelt protects me 50% of the time, and no seat belt protects me 0% of the time, I'm going with a seatbelt.
Your flip a coin analogy is absolutely a poor analogy in this scenario. You're not advocating removal and replacement of the TSA, you're advocating for removal. That's just insanity.
You are terrible at making points. How many 2 year olds get groped per year? Any job, be it law enforcement, TSA, retail employees, etc, are going to have a small percentage of bad apples. In the US, almost a billion people are screened on domestic flights per year. Less than 100 instances per year occur where people complain about inappropriate behavior by TSA. So that's 0.00000001% of the time someone is groped. And out of those nearly 1 BILLION passengers screened each year, how many security incidents have occurred because of the failure of the TSA? You can sit and stare mouth-open at CNN bickering about how some rogue TSA agent made a Muslim take off her Hijab, but if you want to be illogical with your arguments, go somewhere else with them, or expect to be called out for having zero credibility.
I guess since 0.001% of all cops on the street are corrupt, you'll blame the other 99.999% and stop calling the cops when someone commits a crime against you, ehh? Thought not.
