Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Those are the Google numbers, that included any device that was turned on during the month and managed to connect to the connect to the Android servers. A fairer comparison here would be Mixpanel's Android number, that are obtained using the same methodology was the iOS number. (see my previous post)

You're being defensive. Someone asked: "Wonder if Android has 10% on the newest OS."

I answered. No, it does not. Not even close. Not according to Mixpanel either.
 
You do know Android has over 400+ type of phones from different manufacturers with different hardware. It will not be possible at all. Maybe for the Google Pixel line but that's about it.

Of course, it is well known that Google doesn't care what version of Android are you running, but how many info can it collect from you for ad targeting.

Since data harvesting works flawlessly on back to 4 or 5 iterations of Android, it doesn't matter what version of Android are you running. Just keep using Google services, and please, turn your location sharing on (doesn't mean anything to us, we are gonna know your location like it or not), but please, do it for "better user experience" ***wink***
 
You're being defensive. Someone asked: "Wonder if Android has 10% on the newest OS."

I answered. No, it does not. Not even close. Not according to Mixpanel either.
A comparison like this is a bit silly. A bit like saying Apple has such a small market share compared to the total number of phones sold annually then someone replying with but some of those android phones aren't really smart phones. If you look at just smart phones that can be or are likely to be updateable then Apple has a much larger share. Just like most Android phones wouldn't normally be updated.

Its well known that Android handset makers skin the phone and thus updates will be slow.
Would be better if the makers did not do this and updates would be more frequent.

It also doesn't help that iOS bugs you incessantly, at least it does on all my devices.
 
Current numbers show Android 9.0, released in August, at less than 0.1%.

Android 8.1, released in August 2017, is at 5.8%.
In august 2017 Google launched Android 8.0.
8.1 was an incremental update that mostly has fixes and tweaks for the Pixel phones.

8.0 has 15%
8.1 has 6.13%
[doublepost=1538731255][/doublepost]
Dont forget it is actually easily possible to upgrade on iOS versus android you hope/pray/beg your handset gets an upgrade.

Meanwhile, why is my Samsung S2 Tablet slow as heck after a year of ownership...so annoying
Nobody has to pray for anything just make a little research and see the update track record for the phone model and for the manufacturer they are buying it for.
My cheap mi a1 gets monthly updates and it will also receive Android Pie guaranteed. I knew all this when I bought it for testing purposes.
 
A comparison like this is a bit silly.

It is, but someone asked, and I answered.

There is lot of nuance to the comparison, such as Play Services and security patches being made available to some extent on older OSes. But that wasn't the question.
 
I'm obviously one of the 'few' who had no issues with iOS 11 on my iPhone X from day one.
Well here's the thing with problems, people that have them complain, an if a few popular bloggers gerthe problems it turns into a regular s#$t storm,meanwhile most people don't have problems, but we ever hear from them. Are Is releases perfect on day one? Of course not, could Apple doa better job with qa/beta, in some cases yes in others not so much. Personally I can't remember the last time I was hit by a majir IOS issue so I"m in the same group as you, in fact I think this group includes most IOS users but I have no data atm so I might be wrong
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
More than it being Google's business model, Google has little control over if and when OEMs choose to roll out the update. Google is trying to make it easier for OEMs to issue timely updates but it's still OEMs choice.
Most cheap Android phones have little incentive to provide update support for older hardware and customers know this when buying a cheaper less known phone models.
So, if you compare iOS install base vs. Android's, it's like comparing apples and oranges. That's why look at the number of Android update on Pixel phones

So it’s only a fair comparison if you happen to ignore that Google’s business model for their OS practically guarantees little or no upgrades from their OEMs?
 
overtaking.... Sounds more like a race, than anything.. Slow and steady, i say.
 
Finally updated my IPP to iOS 12 last night as that was my last iDevice that had not been updated.

Certainly liking iOS 12 much more than iOS 11 thus far.
 
  • Like
Reactions: decafjava
More than it being Google's business model, Google has little control over if and when OEMs choose to roll out the update.

That's Google's problem, not ours.

So, if you compare iOS install base vs. Android's, it's like comparing apples and oranges. That's why look at the number of Android update on Pixel phones

Google can't have it both ways. Either Android has a large market share, in which case the cheap devices that never get any upgrades absolutely do matter, or only good™ Android phones count, in which case Android's market share is pitiful. Google sells roughly as many Pixel phones in a year as Apple sells iPhones in a week. That's really not a useful comparison.
 
iOS 12 is the first iOS beta I've ever installed. It was actually faster, the hype was real on this one.

That said, I'd really like an upgrade to iOS 6 with current security patches. It was so much prettier.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NetMage and Ravi_MR
On the iPhone 6 Plus, for example, apps launch up to 40 percent faster, while the keyboard can appear up to 50 percent faster. Opening the camera on the Lock screen to take a photo can be done 70 percent faster.

This is comparing iOS 11 performance to 12. Are there iOS 10 to 12 numbers?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NetMage
iOS adoption will always be higher than Android since it's required for app compatibility and higher # of bug fixes.

Android apps are written to be 100% backwards compatible with Android 5.x Lollipop from 2014 and have fewer bugs overall. Even 2013 4.4 Kit Kat has >90% compatibility and had features that iOS has yet to get like placing icons anywhere on home screen, swipe away incoming calls, split screen multitasking on phones, background multitasking, emulation (backwards compatible with 2010 Gingerbread 2.3), etc.
Apparently you aren't very familiar with iOS, which has had background multitasking since iPhone OS version one.
Also, the Play store now requires minimum Android 8 (API 26) compatibility for new Apps and after November for updates as well to be on the Play store, which means only about 20% of the Android installed base will get App updates or be able to get new Apps unless they can update Android. Also, API 26 places restrictions on backgrounded apps similar to iOS to finally catch up with power management comparable to iOS.
I think no remarks are needed on your ridiculous comments about bugs.
[doublepost=1538892273][/doublepost]
Is jail breaking a thing? Why would one want to compromise the security of their phone by jail breaking? To each their own I guess. I don't jailbreak.
Jailbreaking doesn't compromise security any more than being able to sideload apps on MacOS or Windows does - it is all in what you do with your new capabilities.
 
iOS adoption will always be higher than Android since it's required for app compatibility and higher # of bug fixes. .

If that were true than google wouldn’t bother with android os updates, or project treble.

Just because android os updates are broken doesn’t mean they are useless.

Android apps are written to be 100% backwards compatible with Android 5.x Lollipop from 2014 and have fewer bugs overall. Even 2013 4.4 Kit Kat has >90% compatibility and had features that iOS has yet to get like placing icons anywhere on home screen, swipe away incoming calls, split screen multitasking on phones, background multitasking, emulation (backwards compatible with 2010 Gingerbread 2.3), etc.

They kind of have to. Not many users are on the new android os. So if they don’t app developers wouldn’t really have any reason to develop for android.

Look at how much fortnite made on iOS and you might begin to understand.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.