I think they meant a thief could use the tags to pretend to be a nice person and then steal the lost items.AirTags are not anti theft devices. Apple has expressed this many times.
I think they meant a thief could use the tags to pretend to be a nice person and then steal the lost items.AirTags are not anti theft devices. Apple has expressed this many times.
And if you lost your bag in a public place, it will very likely be picked up by someone.....again, useless item.Lost items.
It was never designed or marketed for stolen items.
Apple has never advertised air tags as to find stolen items.you are trying to use them for unauthorized purposes.Won’t this mean that a robber could use that feature to deactivate a tag in stolen property?
I hope this was sarcasm because first, they weren't designed for stolen items. Second, if your item is lost, the chances the person who finds it and keeps it using this feature on their phone instead of just finding it are 1 in a million.And thieves everywhere rejoice.
This is STUPID, STUPID, STUPID!
Quite likely Apple’s worst decision ever.
I want my money back for the now useless AirTags that I bought.
One issue is that Apple is having trouble differentiating between tracking and stalking. Maybe it’s the right choice, but it’s frustrating.I'd much rather people be able to prevent stalking attempts. Your stolen property can be dealt with but stalking can lead to serious injury or worse. Grow up people
Apple seems to be making it as hard as possible on purpose to make AirTags useless for anti-theft purposes. This could have been a groundbreaking product; imagine thieves being afraid to steal anything because it might have an AirTag in it? I would have bought one for my bike and my backpack. But nope, not the case because Apple makes it so trivial to find and disable.
I totally get the anti-stalking angle, but seriously... There's plenty of tracking devices stalkers can buy to track someone that are even better than AirTags.
Apple went the wrong way with AirTags, in my opinion. I suspect they're terrified of lawsuits from stalking victims.
Couldn't a robber already just remove the tag and throw it in the trash?Won’t this mean that a robber could use that feature to deactivate a tag in stolen property?
Who says they haven't thought about this?This is such a hastily/poorly thought out move. Apple needs to be smarter in how they do this.
I have a pretty pricey bike that I literally use as my sole mode of transportation in the city that I live in. I always lock it up. The worst I've ever experienced is someone glueing the lock, and it took the locksmith 15 minutes to cut the thing off (an ABUS Granite). But I'm still cautious and so I hid an AirTag in one of the forks.
For the most part, this now renders that useless. I went ahead and added another AirTag mounted on the exterior of the frame. Hopefully any would-be bike thief will detect the obvious one using this god-awful functionality and not even notice that there is a 2nd hidden away. But that's wishful thinking at this point.
They've completely bastardized their own product all in the name of a knee-jerk reaction.
Zero mentions of the word "Stolen"
So for everyone thinking that they can use the Air Tags to find stolen items, just remember, that's NOT what they were designed for.
You wanna use them for that then go right ahead, but quit whining that these 15.2 features make such a purpose less useful.