Oops. I meant to post this on the instagram article. Doh!What? That has nothing to do with Apple
They don’t own Instagram
I would guess that this is likely to provide a simple icon that is universal worldwide.OVER-SIMPLIFIED = LESS DISTINCTIVE.
I am used to the current icon for Maps, and think the new icon is an oversimplification that won't catch my eye as much as the current one.
The removal of the route symbol means the icon loses an important visual cue.
So I regard the new Maps icon as a case of "change for change's sake", and not as something that will enhance my use of iOS.
Well, it really is quite likely that removing the 280 sheild is related to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junípero_Serra#Treatment_of_Native_CaliforniansOVER-SIMPLIFIED = LESS DISTINCTIVE.
I am used to the current icon for Maps, and think the new icon is an oversimplification that won't catch my eye as much as the current one.
The removal of the route symbol means the icon loses an important visual cue.
It's really not. It serves no purpose at all if you have very few Apps - I have 10 on my phone, which the App Library brilliantly sorts into nine folders - and if you have a lot of Apps, you have always had the option of sorting them into folders anyway. There is no problem that it solves, it's just stupid and creates a second unnecessary page (out of three) on my phone. That's what groupthink looks like.Would you remove the application folder on macOS too? That’s what the App Library is. Its useful.
Ten apps is not many, it’s safe to assume most users have more than ten. The iPhone comes with more than ten, for example. I find it extremely useful. It means I can have one homescreen with my regular apps, swipe right for widgets, swipe left for app library where my most used are there at the top. Otherwise swipe down for search.It's really not. It serves no purpose at all if you have very few Apps - I have 10 on my phone, which the App Library brilliantly sorts into nine folders - and if you have a lot of Apps, you have always had the option of sorting them into folders anyway. There is no problem that it solves, it's just stupid and creates a second unnecessary page (out of three) on my phone. That's what groupthink looks like.
Yeah, but you already had the ability to create folders and store Apps in them, so it solves nothing.Ten apps is not many, it’s safe to assume most users have more than ten. The iPhone comes with more than ten, for example. I find it extremely useful. It means I can have one homescreen with my regular apps, swipe right for widgets, swipe left for app library where my most used are there at the top. Otherwise swipe down for search.
But I get your use case doesn’t work like this. Hiding the screen would benefit you yes. It does solve problems for others, though. Lets not assume things on someone else’s behalf. It works exactly ike the app folder on macOS works, and you put your most useful where you can find them or else leave them be.
It solves having to have folders at all. It solves needing to organise the inorganisable (apps with one single purpose, that you only need once in a blue moon, for example). its ok if you don’t like it, but your use case and wishes are yours alone. It doesnt solve anything for *you*, that’s not the same as it solves *nothing*.Yeah, but you already had the ability to create folders and store Apps in them, so it solves nothing.
It is a folder, just one that you swipe to rather than click on, organized into sub-folders using a logic you no longer control. It does nothing that you could do better prior to its creation. That’s not a different use case, it’s a redundant, sloppily designed and poorly considered waste of space. It’s objectively stupid.It solves having to have folders at all. It solves needing to organise the inorganisable (apps with one single purpose, that you only need once in a blue moon, for example). its ok if you don’t like it, but your use case and wishes are yours alone. It doesnt solve anything for *you*, that’s not the same as it solves *nothing*.
Ha ha. This masterful design change was done to please the Android lovers for getting the Android style widgets every where on the icon tiles, just like the Android pseudo tablets, at the expense of making the icons layout really really ugly.Just give me back 6 icons in each row on portrait Home Screen in iPadOS.
Thanks
Taking away the "280" makes it art? The "280" made the icon intuitive?A maps icon that’s more art and/or Star Trek than intuitive. Yay.
Yes. It’s not just a number but is a symbol common to Highway signs. And the zoomed in streets look more like art than a discernible map. Now disagree with me.A maps icon that’s more art and/or Star Trek than intuitive. Yay.
The tidbits come with a side of riceWhat's the difference between "iOS 15 Beta 2 Tidbits" and "iOS 15 Beta 2--Bug Fixes, Changes, and Improvements"?
Except it’s really not, unless you are using a mouse or trackpad.I'm glad the reload button in Safari is back.
It doesn’t, really. It’s just as intuitive as it’s always been with a big ol’ blue arrow on it. Eh, some folks never figured out how to use a mouse, some folks never understood touch interfaces, and some will never be able to tell it’s a Map icon and won’t know what they should tap on to get the map. Technology/Design marches on, the young and flexible of mind pick it up and keep going, others stagnate.Taking away the "280" makes it art? The "280" made the icon intuitive?
It doesn’t, really. It’s just as intuitive as it’s always been with a big ol’ blue arrow on it. Eh, some folks never figured out how to use a mouse, some folks never understood touch interfaces, and some will never be able to tell it’s a Map icon and won’t know what they should tap on to get the map. Technology/Design marches on, the young and flexible of mind pick it up and keep going, others stagnate.
Highway signs only look like that in the US.Yes. It’s not just a number but is a symbol common to Highway signs. And the zoomed in streets look more like art than a discernible map. Now disagree with me.![]()
Glad to hear the icon is slightly different. Maybe one of these decades they'll get around to creating a color scheme for the maps themselves that have some contrast and are actually legible in a bright sunlit car or a dark night. You know, when you'd actually use the maps app. & maybe, a search function in the maps app that can actually see the names in my contacts AND find their addresses when selected, instead of the usual, of just showing them momentarily and then forgetting and then pretending they don't exist and that didn't just happen. On iPad or iPhone, Maps is still dysfunctional after all these years.
I’m thinking the word “Maps” right under it would be a big clue.It doesn’t, really. It’s just as intuitive as it’s always been with a big ol’ blue arrow on it. Eh, some folks never figured out how to use a mouse, some folks never understood touch interfaces, and some will never be able to tell it’s a Map icon and won’t know what they should tap on to get the map. Technology/Design marches on, the young and flexible of mind pick it up and keep going, others stagnate.