I get your joke but isn't Siri voice-specific?
Nope.
Supposed to but it seldom works that way.
I get your joke but isn't Siri voice-specific?
Because then (I’m guessing Apple’s logic here) everyone would just forget the settings passcode because most people wouldn’t use it frequently. It’s the same people who need the device passcode to reset their Apple ID passwords because they forget them but remember the passcode they use all the timeThis! Why not have the original passcode, to unlock things in system settings, and a second passcode that only unlocks the screen? That way you could unlock the screen in public if needed and it won’t matter if anyone sees that passcode because it won’t unlock anything in settings.
Could you elaborate on how to make the settings app require Face IDYou can make the Settings app require Face ID to open. And if you want to make your phone more secure, don't allow access to Control Center outside of the Settings app which can be secured with Face ID. I do that for all my important apps.
Open Shortcuts AppCould you elaborate on how to make the settings app require Face ID
Appreciate the humor. But, on a more serious note, my understanding is that a thief at your home would be prevented from gaining access to your iPhone's sensitive settings with the Stollen Device Protection feature enabled. In this situation, biometric authentication will remain a requirement - even when the phone is at a trusted location and the thief knows the iPhone's passcode.now the thieves will be racing you back to your home to unlock your settings. 'Siri, direct me to my home'...
Now, Apple, please add faceid to the mail app
This is why we have password managers, or pen and paper. My Apple ID password is 16 alpha/numeric/special characters and I keep it written down on paper at home. This method is secure because I wrote it down as a 24 character string but only I know which characters need to be removed, and which other characters need to be substituted, before entering it into a text box. I mean, it’s basic cryptography. Do people not use their brains anymore?Because then (I’m guessing Apple’s logic here) everyone would just forget the settings passcode because most people wouldn’t use it frequently. It’s the same people who need the device passcode to reset their Apple ID passwords because they forget them but remember the passcode they use all the time
Why though? A device is still findable even if turned off. I mean, I guess for example if you notice your phone has just been taken to have a friend call you so you can locate it, maybe, considering it’s not on mute. Or ping it with your Apple Watch. What else do you figure that would be useful for?Only thing missing for me is shut down of device to require faceid/touchid (maybe an extra optin) and it has all I would want! really good move nonetheless by Apple.
You can use Face ID to open Apple Mail.Does the Microsoft Outlook app on iOS allow a user to protect email access, by configuring the app to require Face ID and/or a PIN for authentication? If so, are there any disadvantages to using the Outlook app in place of the default Apple Mail app?
Currently you can only force restart, or hard reset as it’s often called, that could still be a thing though turning off notNot possible, there needs to be a way to force shut down/restart your device if something goes wrong.
Oh, like my patent?Having looser security requirements in safer places such as home and work reminds me of an idea I had back in 2013 called "smart passcode for iPhone":- In the meantime, I patented this idea with a former colleague for hearing aids.
Works on my family phones...Nope.
Supposed to but it seldom works that way.
Works on my family phones...
Yes it does, used it for work accounts.Does the Microsoft Outlook app on iOS allow a user to protect email access, by configuring the app to require Face ID and/or a PIN for authentication? If so, are there any disadvantages to using the Outlook app in place of the default Apple Mail app?
It doesnt fail, its the software that makes it fail. When it doesnt scan face 3times in a row(or something like that) due to different reasons(bad lightning, bad angle, etc) it requires you to enter passcode for phone to unlock and faceid to work again. It is a stupid solution, phone should always prioritize faceid and keep passlock as a secondary optionSo what’s the fallback when Face ID fails?