Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
and what about when customers go to the Apple Store for a repair and have to turn off Find My, will they also have to hang around for an hour before they can do it?
 
This! Why not have the original passcode, to unlock things in system settings, and a second passcode that only unlocks the screen? That way you could unlock the screen in public if needed and it won’t matter if anyone sees that passcode because it won’t unlock anything in settings.
Because then (I’m guessing Apple’s logic here) everyone would just forget the settings passcode because most people wouldn’t use it frequently. It’s the same people who need the device passcode to reset their Apple ID passwords because they forget them but remember the passcode they use all the time
 
  • Like
Reactions: kitKAC
You can make the Settings app require Face ID to open. And if you want to make your phone more secure, don't allow access to Control Center outside of the Settings app which can be secured with Face ID. I do that for all my important apps.
Could you elaborate on how to make the settings app require Face ID
 
Could you elaborate on how to make the settings app require Face ID
Open Shortcuts App
Tap on Automation in bottom center of the screen
In upper right corner, tap on the + sign
Scroll down until you see the APP option and select
"When" App is make sure Opened is ticked as well as the "run immediately" option
Where is says App, tap on Choose and then select the apps(s) you want to require Face ID and tap Next
When "your app name" is opened, tap on New Blank Automation
Tap on Add Action
In search bar, input Lock Screen and then select and tap done
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Chuckeee
Automatically deciding where to use this feature is problematic. A school, for example, is a frequent location but that doesn’t make it safe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sk1ski1
All fantastic improvements BUT still no simple ***** of onscreen passwords. Seems like Apple is ignoring the most obvious fix to this issue.
 
now the thieves will be racing you back to your home to unlock your settings. 'Siri, direct me to my home'...
Appreciate the humor. But, on a more serious note, my understanding is that a thief at your home would be prevented from gaining access to your iPhone's sensitive settings with the Stollen Device Protection feature enabled. In this situation, biometric authentication will remain a requirement - even when the phone is at a trusted location and the thief knows the iPhone's passcode.
 
These are great changes! Hopefully I’ll never need to use it lol. I might turn it on when I go out to places where the likelihood is higher though
 
Now, Apple, please add faceid to the mail app

Does the Microsoft Outlook app on iOS allow a user to protect email access, by configuring the app to require Face ID and/or a PIN for authentication? If so, are there any disadvantages to using the Outlook app in place of the default Apple Mail app?
 
Because then (I’m guessing Apple’s logic here) everyone would just forget the settings passcode because most people wouldn’t use it frequently. It’s the same people who need the device passcode to reset their Apple ID passwords because they forget them but remember the passcode they use all the time
This is why we have password managers, or pen and paper. My Apple ID password is 16 alpha/numeric/special characters and I keep it written down on paper at home. This method is secure because I wrote it down as a 24 character string but only I know which characters need to be removed, and which other characters need to be substituted, before entering it into a text box. I mean, it’s basic cryptography. Do people not use their brains anymore?
 
I wonder how this is going to work if FaceID or TouchID aren’t available because of a broken Home button or cracked screen.
I turn it on, I drop my iPhone SE and TouchID is dead, what now?
 
Only thing missing for me is shut down of device to require faceid/touchid (maybe an extra optin) and it has all I would want! really good move nonetheless by Apple.
Why though? A device is still findable even if turned off. I mean, I guess for example if you notice your phone has just been taken to have a friend call you so you can locate it, maybe, considering it’s not on mute. Or ping it with your Apple Watch. What else do you figure that would be useful for?
 
What I did not understand yet:
Currently you can change the biometrics using the device passcode, at least after some unsuccessful tries of the iPhone to recognize you face or your fingerprints. You do not need the Apple ID, it is just the device passcode for this change.

This was the major fraud, because if a thief does this, all your passkey and other authentication can be used by „the new face“ or „new fingerprint“ of a thief. Kind of account GAU.

How is this issue fixed with the new protection options? Is it no longer possible to change faceID or touchID by using the device passcode? I did not read this in the feature description.
 
Does the Microsoft Outlook app on iOS allow a user to protect email access, by configuring the app to require Face ID and/or a PIN for authentication? If so, are there any disadvantages to using the Outlook app in place of the default Apple Mail app?
You can use Face ID to open Apple Mail.

 
Not possible, there needs to be a way to force shut down/restart your device if something goes wrong.
Currently you can only force restart, or hard reset as it’s often called, that could still be a thing though turning off not
 
Having looser security requirements in safer places such as home and work reminds me of an idea I had back in 2013 called "smart passcode for iPhone":
- In the meantime, I patented this idea with a former colleague for hearing aids.
Oh, like my patent?

 
I didn’t read anything about how this would work with security keys in this nor other articles about the passcode feature. I would hope Apple would require a security key to change the appleid password regardless of location.
 
Does the Microsoft Outlook app on iOS allow a user to protect email access, by configuring the app to require Face ID and/or a PIN for authentication? If so, are there any disadvantages to using the Outlook app in place of the default Apple Mail app?
Yes it does, used it for work accounts.
Outlook app is not “lightweight” as I’d prefer for my personal mail, but should work.
 
So what’s the fallback when Face ID fails?
It doesnt fail, its the software that makes it fail. When it doesnt scan face 3times in a row(or something like that) due to different reasons(bad lightning, bad angle, etc) it requires you to enter passcode for phone to unlock and faceid to work again. It is a stupid solution, phone should always prioritize faceid and keep passlock as a secondary option
 
  • Like
Reactions: addamas
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.