Apple does its generations for iPads Pros based on screen size. We're on the fourth generation 11" Pro (the first was the A12X model from 2018), but we're on the sixth generation 12.9" iPad Pro because there were two generations prior to the 2018 model that were basically blown up versions of the old design with the same screen size, plus a 9.7" iPad with the guts of the Pro that existed for I believe one model year.Wasn't the first-generation iPad Pro 11-inch? 🤔 What's the 9.7-inch?
It is the same with my parents, whom are in their early 70's and mid 60's. They can't handle my newer iphone when they occasionally have to use it for something. They really rely on a Home button as an anchor on their older iphones.
They better drop support for the studio display too then 🙄 the 11 is too new. They were still selling them as the better alternative to the SE last year and I bought one for someoneI suppose that this hints that iOS 18 in 2024 will drop support for iPhone 11.
Things march forward I guess.
Sometimes you have to cut old ties. Supporting old equipment forever means making compromises. 5 years is enough!
We want stability updates at this point and security updates won't offer thatHow is offering iOS 17 with no new features any different that continuing to offer security updates to iOS 16? It's just a difference in branding at that point.
Does anyone know if iPhone X includes the Xs phone? Or just the original X.
My Xs is still working fine and I can probably get another year or so out of it if its not obsoleted by Apple.
I give the A10X at least one more year. The addition of 4GB of ram really made a big difference with longevity.
iPad (2018) with A10/2GB supports iPadOS 17.
iPad Pro 10.5 (2017) with A10X/4GB supports iPadOS 17.
iPhone X (2017) with A11/3GB doesn't support iOS 17.
This has nothing to do with hardware, but rather what marketing decides.
I haven't reviewed/read 6 pages of comments yet because of personal time constraints today lol but as an Apple user since 1994, I just don't get this. They like to keep people pushing to upgrade their devices, I get that- that's part of running a for-profit company, that answers to shareholders, etc...
iOS 17 and iPadOS 17 will drop support for the iPhone 8, iPhone 8 Plus, iPhone X, first-generation 9.7-inch and 12.9-inch iPad Pro, and fifth-generation iPad, according to a source with a proven track record for upcoming software updates. The devices in this list were released between November 2015 and November 2017.
![]()
If this rumor is accurate, iOS 17 and iPadOS 17 would be incompatible with most devices powered by the A11 Bionic chip or older. The only exceptions would be the sixth-generation and seventh-generation iPad models with the A10 Fusion chip and the second-generation 10.5-inch and 12.9-inch iPad Pro with the A10X Fusion chip.
iPhones and iPads equipped with the A5 through A11 chip are affected by a bootrom security vulnerability that Apple cannot patch on these devices, as the bootrom operates in a read-only state. The exploit has allowed for these devices to be perpetually jailbroken on a wide range of iOS versions, allowing users to modify the iOS file system.
Last year, iOS 16 and iPadOS 16 dropped support for quite a few devices, including the iPhone 6s, iPhone 6s Plus, iPhone 7, iPhone 7 Plus, original iPhone SE, final iPod touch, second-generation iPad Air, and fourth-generation iPad mini.
Apple is expected to announce iOS 17 during its WWDC keynote on June 5.
Article Link: iOS 17 Rumored to Drop Support for iPhone X, First-Generation iPad Pro, and More
2023-2017 seems to be 6 yearsSo 5 years seems to be apples limit now.
New versions of iOS typically bring more bugs and stability issues, not less.We want stability updates at this point and security updates won't offer that
The devices will not suddenly stop working, they will continue to work for years to come. Those users just won’t get any of the new features, and eventually once the Xcode/development tools change they will stop supporting apps on those devices.5-6 years isn’t enough. If the devices are still functional and capable (they are) then ending support is just another way for Apple to generate more unnecessary ewaste. Imagine if your car manufacturer ended support for your car after 6 years. “But cars are expected to last longer” why? Cost? Size? You can attempt to justify it using these metrics but the real reason cars are expected to last longer is because historically they have lasted longer. We could easily apply this same logic to electronics now that Moore’s law is slowing down. There was a point in time where a 5 year old device would be unusable, which is where this 5 year expectation originates. Now, My 5 year old XS and Macbook Pro work completely fine, and my expectations have changed. I would like to see official support for 10 years which is probably about when the hardware will become unusable.
They also won't get the security updates, and even if they do get some updates, they're often later and not as complete as the newest OS. Security matters.The devices will not suddenly stop working, they will continue to work for years to come. Those users just won’t get any of the new features, and eventually once the Xcode/development tools change they will stop supporting apps on those devices.
Security sure does matter, that’s why apple recently updated iOS 12 with a security update and older MacOS version. They will still get security updates, but no one knows for how long.They also won't get the security updates, and even if they do get some updates, they're often later and not as complete as the newest OS. Security matters.