You're really stretching here.
Ask any normal person what a feature "coming back to the Watch" means and you won't get anyone saying "that means I view the data on my iPhone"
The measurement is on the watch and just like before, most users will view the data as they did, on their iPhones, after automatic readings
So now it's like Sleep data - you see it on your watch. Glad its back.
how were they bullied? Apple had developed their own sensor and was manufacturing it before Miasmo had even submitted their patent which is vague and mentions a watch only in a single added sentence. Apple showed in court the they had developed a different way to measure blood Oxygen and only because of a jury hold out didn't win the case. The ITC accepted the argument they had used 'trade secrets' with no proof of same. This is a case of people just liking to pile on the big guy, Apple did nothing wrong.Because they're being bullied around by a behemoth (Apple).
Is that good?
As you now do Oxygen saturation data. *Yawn* big deal, atleast its there.?
No, you view it on your iPhone only.
So if the normal person did this before 1/24 and viewed the results, along with plenty of other metrics, on their watch.
..and now they always have to get their phone and open the Health app to go find it ..
You think they won't find that pretty different and perhaps fairly unappealing?
I wonder how the normal person would feel if there were told and it was explained "why" Apple has done all this.
we are going to watch this movie, but just so you know, it was stolen and/or people with the rights to it were not remunerated as they should have been.
You keep repeating this, but it does not make it so. There has only been one jury trial on this issue, and Masimo was unable that jury that Apple was infringing. Only one of the jurors thought that, while the other six voted against them. In addition, patents are intended only to project a specific implementation of an idea (with the goal of generating new and different ways of doing things) - this is not about “our maneuvering” anyone, this is about finding a different way of doing things.Apple used IP they had no right to and you're happy about Apple "out maneuvering" the IP rights holder?
Cool. So how does the phone get the reading, again?You're really stretching here.
Ask any normal person what a feature "coming back to the Watch" means and you won't get anyone saying "that means I view the data on my iPhone"
Because they're being bullied around by a behemoth (Apple).
Is that good?
Where is this option located? I can’t find anything about itBased on what I'm seeing it is both on demand and regularly scheduled. I've gotten multiple results on my Ultra 2 since updating and running an initial on demand measurement. There is an option to not have it run while in Sleep or Theater mode (since the light might be annoying in those contexts).
Repeating a blunt assertion doesn’t make it true.Sorry, very few users do on-demand readings of SpO2.
You'll have to share a link of some data to support that assertion please.
Otherwise you're just making that up to support your current view here.
The beta doesn't have that update.Doesn’t show up on AW 9 running iOS 26 beta 6 and watchOS 26 beta 6. Anyone else have any luck with this?
Masimo spent $200 million on lawyers and was just out maneuvered by Apple.
Glad to have o2 back!
They need to fire their CEO. ROI on that exercise was $0 now.
So if the normal person did this before 1/24 and viewed the results, along with plenty of other metrics, on their watch..
...and now they always have to get their phone and open the Health app to go find it ..
You think they won't find that pretty different and perhaps fairly unappealing?
I wonder how the normal person would feel if there were told and it was explained "why" Apple has done all this. Sort of like telling them ... we are going to watch this movie, but just so you know, it was stolen and/or people with the rights to it were not remunerated as they should have been.
Same. I’m so happy to see it is at least partially back. I’ve been holding onto an OG Ultra because I don’t want to lose this feature. I was bummed that I would not be getting the Ultra 3 since I really want the apnea detection, but don’t want to lose O2 measurements.I was so excited to read that the blood oxygen reading is back… and then I see that the readings are only available on the iPhone Health app.
I guess it’s better than nothing. 🤷♂️
I didn't notice this at first. I agree. I don't like not being able to view the results on my Apple Watch.You're really stretching here.
Ask any normal person what a feature "coming back to the Watch" means and you won't get anyone saying "that means I view the data on my iPhone"
I‘ve had it on my AWU1 in Europe and all I can say is that Blood Oxygen Monitoring is and absolute gimmick (for me) and would never be the reason I’d upgrade.With blood oxygen monitoring back on the menu, I might upgrade to a newer Apple Watch. Maybe the Ultra.
I am so glad i did not upgrade from the AW 6 to the 9 ! I can check BO levels without having to reach for my iPhone. - “recent customs ruling”!! Mmhh, i wonder if …Sensor capability is coming back to the watch. Whether said data is displayed ON the watch or not, the sensors are enabled again.
does anyone (incl @jclo ) have any more data on this "US customs ruling"?Apple said that blood oxygen monitoring is coming back to U.S. Apple Watch models due to a "recent U.S. Customs ruling."
If there is no infringement anymore, why not give your customers the feature back in full? So, there are first buyer AW 9 users who have the readout on their watch and AW 9 users who need the iPhone for that? What a joke and what a disservice by Apple.Apple is no longer using methods that infringe on IP. Not sure why that’s so hard to understand.
I've compared my watch's readings when the nurses at the Dr office took SpO2 readings and they all have been with 1%, I think that's quite accurate. And in fairness, when you get your SpO2 measured at the doctors, they typically do blood pressure as well and you are sitting still for a minute or tow or more, you should use the same behavior when taking measurements with the AW.I‘ve had it on my AWU1 in Europe and all I can say is that Blood Oxygen Monitoring is and absolute gimmick (for me) and would never be the reason I’d upgrade.
The data is barely accurate because you have to sit still during the measurement to get the best results - the majority of the data that gets collected during the day is unreliable at best. If you really depend on knowing your blood oxygen data chances are you‘re not using an Apple Watch…