This could be useful around Los Angeles where AT&T has no signal whatsoever.
you do know its only free for 2 years on newer iPhones
I wouldn’t be to upset if Apple offered a mini every 3 years or so. I know that mini is a very niche phone. But, a 3 year cycle would fit right into my upgrade plans.Make another mini and I'll be interested.
I was recently down in Cornwall and at various places I had no reception (EE) and no WiFi whatsoever. The signal icon at the top of the screen turned into a "Satellite" icon, I sent a text message to my wife, and she received it within a minute or two. So Who Knows, Maybe we have it in the UK,but not officially. 🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️
The satellite feature will tell you when it’s connected to a satellite.I am in Cornwall using EE and there are definitely places where reception disappears completely; particularly in woodlands or some harbours. I'm wondering if your message was held in a queue and then released the moment you had tiny bit of signal. It's actually improved recently since they switched off 3G, but having satellite for situations like this would certainly be welcome.
Shhhhhh!I am really surprised they are not charging for this. I wonder how this will affect those companies that are selling this type of service.
FirmamentThis is false.
Satellite service is not "by definition" worldwide. Physics alone means that a satellite on the other side of the globe in geosynchronous orbit cannot communicate with a ground station as it does not have line of sight. It takes a constellation of satellites to maintain complete global coverage. The number of which is dependent on numerous factors including frequency, altitude of the satellite, orbital pattern, and the robustness of the ground station.
If you're looking for a simplistic real world example, satellite radio would be a good one. The coverage is limited by the positioning of the satellites over the Western hemisphere. You can't receive these radio signals in the Eastern hemisphere, in the Arctic areas of Canada, or past the Southern tip of Mexico.
It's simply not worldwide because it's satellite.
I think it comes down to if someone like apple is willing to invest the billions upon billions of dollars to achieve something like this. In the long run it could be quite profitable for someone like apple to make an exclusive network for their devices. They won’t have to worry about Qualcomm modems any more and they can market connectivity anywhere. You could even visit other countries and your service wouldn’t need to change. They could get rid of SIM cards and not even worry about eSIM. They wouldn’t have to deal with other carriers and can just get the monthly service charge themselves. And we all know apple wants to get into monthly subscription more and more. It’s a high risk move with the cost but if done right could be super prosperous for themSeems unlikely due to cost, bandwidth, capacity, and latency issues. Satellite usage will no doubt increase in the coming years and the tech will continue to advance but I think it will be quite some time, if it ever happens, before ALL cell service is handled by satellite.
It sounds like its a weak transmitter if there can’t be any obstruction apart from (don’t actually know) hundreds maybe thousands of miles of nothing, I bet one day we will only do it that way……..?I’m so glad this feature was available for me.
I was stuck in Asheville, North Carolina during hurricane Helene.
We had no power, no internet, no landline phones, and no cell service in most of the County and counties around as well.
I was able to connect to a satellite on multiple occasions to send messages to loved ones to let them know I was alive.
You have to be outside and you have to be pointing your phone at a satellite and keep adjusting your position as the satellite moves across the sky. Also there has to be a clear line of sight. Even a window will block the satellite connection. I couldn’t connect thru my hotel window but I could once I went outside.
While Starlink certainly has more birds up there, there doesn't seem to be any love lost between T.Cook and E.Musk, so I wouldn't watch for a partnership there.
I'm not sure of that.There wouldn't necessarily have to be a formal partnership. Pending government approvals, Starlink (Musk) reportedly plans to provide free emergency satellite service for all phones. It would presumably function through an app. Unless Starlink (Musk) doesn't make the app available for iOS or Apple (Cook) blocks it from the App Store or in other ways, it should work on iPhones. It could also be made available through alternative iOS app stores but only in the EU at this point.
I understand what Starlink is developing instead is a direct-to-cell method, that will allow its satellites to 'beam' a 4G LTE signal, therefore compatible with any smartphone out there and which doesn't rely on 'satellite' features. But it needs to partner up with a traditional land carrier to 'authorise' the customer SIM to hook up on the signal. (T-Mobile in the US I believe).
2y from date of first activation would make more sense.if i get a used iPhone 14 from someone else, say bought used or given to me as a hand-me-down, does the free 2 years emergency SOS feature (or satellite messaging) start a new 2 year cycle the day i activate my used iPhone or does it retain and depend on the first original owner’s date of activation? considering Apple has left the feature working for those who have had it for more than 2 years, perhaps there’s no way to know?
if i get a used iPhone 14 from someone else, say bought used or given to me as a hand-me-down, does the free 2 years emergency SOS feature (or satellite messaging) start a new 2 year cycle the day i activate my used iPhone or does it retain and depend on the first original owner’s date of activation? considering Apple has left the feature working for those who have had it for more than 2 years, perhaps there’s no way to know?
Not completely. There are gps sats that work just fine on both poles. It's just a matter of time before sats are everywhere. Tmobile will be working on starlink soon and there are a lot of starlink sats.This is false.
Satellite service is not "by definition" worldwide. Physics alone means that a satellite on the other side of the globe in geosynchronous orbit cannot communicate with a ground station as it does not have line of sight. It takes a constellation of satellites to maintain complete global coverage. The number of which is dependent on numerous factors including frequency, altitude of the satellite, orbital pattern, and the robustness of the ground station.
If you're looking for a simplistic real world example, satellite radio would be a good one. The coverage is limited by the positioning of the satellites over the Western hemisphere. You can't receive these radio signals in the Eastern hemisphere, in the Arctic areas of Canada, or past the Southern tip of Mexico.
It's simply not worldwide because it's satellite.