tried the conversion pounds but it gives LT - would be could if you could choose the conversion output
It seems this problem has already been adressed.Is the new calculator app working correctly? For example: 1 divided by 9 = 0.11111111 then multiply by 9 = 0.99999999
I think I should get 1 as my final answer not 0.99999999. Other calculator apps give me 1 as my final answer.
Yes but hand-held calculators generally represent more digits than even PC's. People who are used to that level of precision from real hand-held calculators might have a rude awakening.I agree with you, although note that 0.999… is equal to 1. Of course calculators only have finite precision, so it’s easy to see how this will happen. 1/9 is 0.111… which is rounded to a finite number of ones.
I've been using PCalc for a few years. It's nice to see the native app become more versatile. I also use Siri a lot for calculations and conversions.
Can it be set to Reverse Polish Notation (RPN)? I've gotten used that inputting format from the HP days. I do have an HP41 calculator app on my iPad and iPhone.
I am using i41CX (maybe because I am _that_ old) but a real math app in iOS (including equation systems solving, physics constants, engineering/chemistry) would be really great value and should be quite easy to do for a company as Apple.
I would argue the built-in apps should provide basic, core functionality and that if users want more that's what third party apps are for. So Apple is playing it right with these updates.Way better, but it's a low bar. Still not quite as good as third party apps.
It’s one app. Just set the mode. I like the iPad version. It’s pretty intuitive.I guess, Calculator and Math Notes are two different apps, but one never knows![]()
It would be insane (or brain-dead) for Apple to leave out RPN from iOS... once again. It was incorporated into the MacOS Calculator years ago.PCCalc is defeinetly one of teh best calculator apps available. I've used it for many years.
Having an RPN option would be grate. Having used HP calculators and PCCalc for so long I struggle with the = sign.
I started with a 45 and have a 41 as well. The plug in cartridges were really innovative; along with the card reader.
Huh? I get 1.Is the new calculator app working correctly? For example: 1 divided by 9 = 0.11111111 then multiply by 9 = 0.99999999
I think I should get 1 as my final answer not 0.99999999. Other calculator apps give me 1 as my final answer.
Is the new calculator app working correctly? For example: 1 divided by 9 = 0.11111111 then multiply by 9 = 0.99999999
I think I should get 1 as my final answer not 0.99999999. Other calculator apps give me 1 as my final answer.
Actually, 0.9 recurring (‘0.’ followed by infinite 9s) is precisely equal to 1. Look up 0.999 in Wikipedia.I am quite possibly the worst person to comment on math but I don’t quite get this either. PCalc gives me a different answer depending on whether I just divided by 9 or not. I don’t know enough math to know which answer is correct. Maybe it’s just rounding because for most purposes that is basically 1. But not quite!
I’ll take your word for it. This Wikipedia page describes my condition. I love numbers but my brain doesn’t. They’re like mental gluten for me.Actually, 0.9 recurring (‘0.’ followed by infinite 9s) is precisely equal to 1. Look up 0.999 in Wikipedia.
In theory, a calculator on a phone/tablet/computer should be able to keep a history of manipulations, simplifying where possible, so that it can internally maintain absolute precision.I agree with you, although note that 0.999… is equal to 1. Of course calculators only have finite precision, so it’s easy to see how this will happen. 1/9 is 0.111… which is rounded to a finite number of ones.
pfffft...The Math Notes couldn't even solve the first simple equation I wrote in it. And, coincidentally, the equation is what Apple uses to justify its memory pricing.
![]()
Is the new calculator app working correctly? For example: 1 divided by 9 = 0.11111111 then multiply by 9 = 0.99999999
I think I should get 1 as my final answer not 0.99999999. Other calculator apps give me 1 as my final answer.
Jony Ive did bring flat design upon us (by copying Microsoft, which pioneered it), but it is Tim Cook's fault. Steve Jobs kept Ive's tastelss tendencies in check while letting his tasteful tendencies flourish. Cook allows Ive's tasteless tendenies to run wild. There's a reason why no iPhone released while Jobs was alive ever had a camera bump or notch.Did not the greatest taste master of all (Sir Jony Ive) bring the flat design upon us?
No, they just had huge bezels to hide the camera and the speaker grill on the front. I suspect if Apple replaced the notch with a bezel people on MR would scream, or if a punch hole left a dead spot. Most customers probably don’t care about the notch and like the dynamic island.There's a reason why no iPhone released while Jobs was alive ever had a camera bump or notch.