…how can something be both on device and query the web?If apple cared about privacy, they would invent on device web search instead of selling user search data to google.
…how can something be both on device and query the web?If apple cared about privacy, they would invent on device web search instead of selling user search data to google.
FYI, these aren't artificial intelligence. Implementations of Chat GPT or other LLMs are the most popular examples of actual "AI" that we've seen this decade so far.Siri is not great, but there are many fields in AI where Apple is doing very good - fall detection, health, noise cancellation…
…how can something be both on device and query the web?
That's true ... AI will have entirely new and unexpected ways to be incorrect and unhelpful
An important distinction
They did, it has been reported as a fact, not a rumor.Did they? Or are we just taking rumors as fact now? And specifically what functionality is OpenAI going to be running?
Apple can't even get Siri to work right. HomePods are a great example of pure failure. Apple expect us to think they can do AI better than the others? lol
Hmm... Artificial Intelligence turning Actual Intelligence would eventually become interesting. A bit of ethical potty training would be progress towards that.FYI, these aren't artificial intelligence. Implementations of Chat GPT or other LLMs are the most popular examples of actual "AI" that we've seen this decade so far.
Yeah, It's pretty good tracking congested tourist traps. It's pretty much something you'll get from a National Tourist Office. I think you pretty much made an argument for being cautious about this kind of tech.
Here are five affordable Portuguese restaurants in Porto with their TripAdvisor links:
These options offer a good balance of quality and affordability, making them great choices for tourists.
- Taberna Santo António: Known for its traditional Portuguese dishes and cozy atmosphere. TripAdvisor Review
- Nova Era Restaurante: Offers a variety of Portuguese dishes at reasonable prices. TripAdvisor Review
- Morfeu Marginal: Features delicious and affordable Portuguese cuisine. TripAdvisor Review
- Só Tapas: Provides an authentic tapas experience with a Portuguese twist. TripAdvisor Review
- Folias de Baco: A great spot for enjoying healthy and tasty Portuguese food. TripAdvisor Review
Yeah, It's pretty good tracking congested tourist traps. It's pretty much something you'll get from a National Tourist Office. I think you pretty much made an argument for being cautious about this kind of tech.
A tourist trap is a term used to describe a place or establishment that primarily exists to attract tourists and extract as much money from them as possible. These locations often offer overpriced goods, services, or experiences that are of lower quality than what might be found elsewhere. Tourist traps are typically characterized by the following features:
While some tourists may enjoy the convenience or novelty of such places, others may feel disappointed by the inauthentic and commercialized nature of the experience.
- High Prices: Goods and services are sold at significantly higher prices than their actual value.
- Low Quality: The quality of products or experiences is often subpar compared to what is available in non-tourist areas.
- Overcrowding: These spots are usually very crowded, as they are heavily promoted to tourists.
- Aggressive Marketing: There is often heavy marketing or advertising to draw in tourists, sometimes with exaggerated claims or misleading information.
- Generic Souvenirs: They frequently sell mass-produced, generic souvenirs that lack authenticity.
- Lack of Authenticity: Experiences and goods offered may lack the genuine cultural or historical significance that they claim to have.
- Convenient Location: Tourist traps are often conveniently located near major attractions, transportation hubs, or in highly trafficked areas.
That's upto apple to invent that feature. They are selling user data (search queries) to google for 20 billion. They shouldn't be advertising privacy then, cause it straight up isn't true if they are accepting 20 billion from Google.…how can something be both on device and query the web?
1.2 is more than 1, therefore, 'decades' is the right word.
You say one and a half apples, NOT one and a half apple.
Nice try, but no cigar! 😁
If something has been going on for 12 years, you would never say (at least not correctly) that it had been going on for *decades*! That implies at least two, if not three, or more.
Even at first glance, the apples example doesn't work because there's a qualitative difference between a simple *count* of physical objects vs. a *duration* or *passage* of time.
Or, to use your apple example, if someone has owned a dozen and half Apple devices, we would never assert that he has owned *dozens* of Apple device as that would imply multiples of a dozen — as in, at least 24, 36, or more!
So, to distinguish this further, it's the difference between a measure that involves single things — one apple, two apples, etc. — vs. a measure that is a collective — that encompasses a particular quantity of things — dozens (12 in each group), decades (10 in each group).
Final example. If something happened 120 years ago, or 150, we wouldn’t that it occurred centuries ago. That would be a gross error, even a lie. We'd say it happened a century plus some years ago or a century and a half ago.
Bottom line. The deleted photos bug has not been there for decades. As MacIver noted, the iphone wasn't even around decades ago! 😁
But even that assertion is wrong….! Let’s just move on, the bug is fixed, there isn’t a huge conspiracy that Apple is secretly holding our photos! It was a bug that affected backups and restoration of backups!Yeah, I should've said "over a decade."
I'm saying that the output you get is a generic outtake of the standard cattle trail. It's like "list the 10 most recent singles by The Beatles". You don't acquire anything but surface knowledge which you would if you actually tracked them down yourself. Following your AI muck up will make a non geriatric tourist miss everything but the traps.ChatGPT:
Most of these places in Norway have high prices (like all places in Norway), high quality, a few of them might be overcrowded sometimes, authenticity and inconvenient locations.
In other news: water is wet and the sky is blue.
Yeah, cloud-based privacy. I’ll totally believe that.What else would they say?
"Privacy will be pretty good ... not perfect, but... ya know ...we'll do our best within reason here..."
🤣
Yeah, cloud-based privacy. I’ll totally believe that.
What could possibly go wrong when data is routing through remote servers for processing.
🤣
That ship has sailed a long time ago when Apple entered advertisement business and we saw App Store ads for the first time.That's upto apple to invent that feature. They are selling user data (search queries) to google for 20 billion. They shouldn't be advertising privacy then, cause it straight up isn't true if they are accepting 20 billion from Google.
Twist: your device will always be connected, and all of your data is stored both locally and on the web. So, by doing “on-device” processing that sends query to the web, they are pulling the cloud copy of your data, not your local one, hence “your data stays with you”.…how can something be both on device and query the web?
FYI, these are exactly what AI is.FYI, these aren't artificial intelligence. Implementations of Chat GPT or other LLMs are the most popular examples of actual "AI" that we've seen this decade so far.
Decoding and understanding the query will be on-device. If the query specifically asks to search for real-time data, the query is made to the web. Either that or Apple relies on their already-'internalized' data sources for live activities (sports scores, flight info, etc). I say "internalized" because this data seems to already be either a part of Siri and Apple apps.Twist: your device will always be connected, and all of your data is stored both locally and on the web. So, by doing “on-device” processing that sends query to the web, they are pulling the cloud copy of your data, not your local one, hence “your data stays with you”.
(Completely made up in case anyone wondering. Tried to be sarcastic but failed)
…how can something be both on device and query the web?
FYI, these are exactly what AI is.
Fall Detection: an algorithm that detects a fall versus running down stairs is AI
Noise cancellation: an algorithm that detects ambient noises that should be cancelled out with other noise is AI
Health: algorithms that detect abnormalities in your personal trends is AI
Photo face detection: algorithms that detect and identify facial features is AI
If you want to get more specific, most of the examples above are machine learning, which is AI. Chat GPT is a subset of machine learning, which is a subset of AI.
Lots of people here don't even realize Apple just released 8 open model AI models that rival Chat GPT at multimodal activities like identifying not only what is in an image, but the context and being able to apply math to it.
It’s not like you have to use Google, you can switch to any provider you want. That kind of cash just to be the default seems like something it would be hard for them to walk away fromThat's upto apple to invent that feature. They are selling user data (search queries) to google for 20 billion. They shouldn't be advertising privacy then, cause it straight up isn't true if they are accepting 20 billion from Google.