Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I like the changes. I think the icons need a bit more polish. I would prefer more liquid glass. Lol

I never liked the flat GUI that became the default across platforms for years. I did like Microsoft mobiles use of a flat GUI the best and we all know what happened to that OS. I would probably be using a MS mobile phone now if it were available. In fact, that entire situation is what got me back into Apple. I used to love liquid glass in MacOS. I think it is nice to alternate. The flat GUI at the time was a nice change but now it is boring. With the state of current hardware more animations are nice. Again I think the entire GUI needs more polish but for the first release I like it.

In my opinion they need to tone it up with liquid glass. A little nostalgia isn't always a bad thing.
 
Last edited:
I find it ok on the iPad, but I don't care for it on the iPhone. I especially dislike it in Safari. One of the ideas behind it was to make the UI go away, so we can focus on the content. But I find it to be exactly opposite. As I scroll I have a blob of the UI showing me the URL, hovering over my content, distracting me. I would much rather have a single bar across the screen at the bottom. The bar could even be liquid glass for all I care. Just don't have this blob giving me the illusion of me seeing more of the content, when I'm not.
 
That's not how effective change works.

Effective change is implemented because a problem needs to be resolved, and those solving the problem understand what they need to do from the user perspective. Windows 95, as much as I hated it, was driven by changes requested by Windows users to make the OS more user-friendly—and it did. Regardless of how we old-school Mac users want to think of it, something like Win95 was necessary for the large-scale adoption of the home computer and everything that came with it. Win95 made DOS easy, and it allowed your parents to work on a spreadsheet from work after you played Doom. It was a seismic shift that affected the world; it was not solely change for change's sake.

What, precisely, is Liquid Glass solving? Sure, Apple could make the argument that it's a common UI, but the UX differs from device to device because the devices' purposes change. As I mentioned way back on another page, implementing a common design language across the devices makes sense—it would allow me to quickly move from an iPad to a Vision Pro to a Mac and generally know what I'm doing and how to navigate around each device. That's not what Liquid Glass is doing—it's simply one type of frosting on different types of cake.
I agree with you regarding the need for Liquid Glass. It seems to be purely eye candy and yet many will not like or want it. My main observation, despite that, is that new features within the OS seem to be desirable and that the often reduced battery life with new versions on older devices seems to have actually improved.

You rightly observe the consistency across devices so perhaps we would need an explanation from Apple engineers as to how they see Liquid Glass improving real-world functionality across all their devices.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: adrianlondon
I’m really enjoying it on my iPhone 16. (It’s in perfect condition with 98% battery capacity after a year and I don’t feel a need to update). I just wish we could change the system fonts.
 
This update is simply awful on both iPhone and Mac. On Mac, for example, the web apps are terrible. text overlapping on the top, plenty of errors. clicking on items - not working and so on. How could they release these atrocities without testing every single bit of the OS, darn...
 
This update is simply awful on both iPhone and Mac. On Mac, for example, the web apps are terrible. text overlapping on the top, plenty of errors. clicking on items - not working and so on. How could they release these atrocities without testing every single bit of the OS, darn...
Y'know, for a company that only builds OSs (and its embedded apps) for devices that only they build (unlike, say, Microsoft or Google) - and that go through at least a year of testing, rewriting and retesting - the number of times Apple produces 'consumer-ready' OSs with clear problems is pretty extraordinary.

Its one thing for a 3rd Party app to have an issue - the developer maybe not as up on the changes Apple throws at an OS at the last minute - but when the company's own apps don't work as intended...

Then of course comes the question like, "What would possess you to think that (add new feature here) was a good idea, did you poll anyone (like the users) as to whether they need it, and did you actually test it first?"
 
Y'know, for a company that only builds OSs (and its embedded apps) for devices that only they build (unlike, say, Microsoft or Google) - and that go through at least a year of testing, rewriting and retesting - the number of times Apple produces 'consumer-ready' OSs with clear problems is pretty extraordinary.

Its one thing for a 3rd Party app to have an issue - the developer maybe not as up on the changes Apple throws at an OS at the last minute - but when the company's own apps don't work as intended...

Then of course comes the question like, "What would possess you to think that (add new feature here) was a good idea, did you poll anyone (like the users) as to whether they need it, and did you actually test it first?"

It sorta makes me wonder "when" they decided to do LG, as the result seems very rushed and lacking in polish.
 
I don't know if it's LG or not but on 2019 16" Intel MBP, typing a reply to an email now comes with about 0.5s delay :D My sides!

Confirmed it’s only when typing in a numbered list. In the paragraph it’s normal. Wonderful!
 
Last edited:
I really hope that Apple adds a section in the Settings app to allow for very fine granular control of the display of Liquid Glass in iOS 26.1 or 26.2. That way, end users can set up the Liquid Glass effect so it is a lot less obtrusive to end users.
 
Well, it is solving a problem, or is intended to solve a problem, for Apple.

It doesn’t solve any tech problem or Ux problem.

It does solve an “infinitive growth” problem. Both shareholders and customers expect significant level of “new shiny stiff” every year.

To be fair, this forum is very guilty of that.

So Apple is under pressure to come up with obviously shines new stiff every year, even when there’s no need for it.

Realistically, there’s absolutely nothing wrong with minor iterative updates each year. It’s a phone. It’s a nature technology, it already has all the functionality it needs.

But then influencers moan, forums, moan, and shareholders get worried.

Of you’re going to blame Apple fir selling snake-oil every year, acknowledge that it’s the users, influencers and internet dwellers / keyboarder warrior that have painted Apple into this corner. (A very wealthy corner, I’m not claiming Apple are victims).

Change only for change’s sake. We are the problem, not Apple. It’s us that has made this happen.

Apple do listen to the Apple community. The problem the the Apple fan community ( like all online communities) is toxically impatient, demanding and overly entitled.

Maybe it’s just a case of getting the corporation we deserve.

Apple is under pressure and this forum is very guilty of that? Nonsense! It was Tims idea to create Vision Pro and do nothing with AI.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Happy_John and ypl
Apple is under pressure and this forum is very guilty of that? Nonsense! It was Tims idea to create Vision Pro and do nothing with AI.
Bad Tim! Naughty Tim! :D

As long as you keep filling forums and generating views about Apple, and keep buying and obsessing about the products, you villainous Tim will be language going all the way to the bank.

Perspective is a wonderful thing.
 
Can you imagine if someone prints out all these comments and delivers them to the Apple campus , 567 - holy moly . I guess this is more pages then Apple guidelines 2025 🙃
 
Not liking this update at all on my iPhone SE 2025.

  • Reduce transparency makes the UI actually legible but then there are some very ugly rough edges.
  • A lot of padding on everything is reducing screen real estate. Bottom tab bars have awkward blank space with the controls aligned at the top edge, making it look like the didn't think at all about how the UI looks like with reduce transparency.
  • Reduce motion is also not as clean. It used to completely remove the animations but now there is a slight ugly animation around the corners of the app when the app opens. App closing is like before at least.
  • Lock screen would stretch the clock vertically even after resizing it in edit mode. Only way to fix it was to put an empty blank widget
  • Lock screen date on top of the time is also not legible, it's completely faded.
  • Photos app is hideous and overly simplistic. I took a screenshot and a video an couldn't find it in the library tab. Has to go to collections and scroll down until i found the video and screenshots media types. Only nice thing is ability to reorder collections to put media types and utilities at the top.
 
note how all the 'positives' are a variation of 'feels' - 'feels so fresh', 'so bouncy', 'just so cool', 'makes a boring smartphone a little more fun' (!) - because who cares about functionality when your boring phone feels 'like bubbles', just throw some emojis in the mix, and you have the paying horde drooling.

good thing they butchered OS too with this vaseline therapy, because the suffering from flat 'depressing' UI was at pandemic levels.

mind boggles.
 
The light flashes, especially using dark mode and in the text app — are SO distracting. I don’t need flashes and flickers everytime i send a message or double tap on a word to highlight it. My god this is bad. First time i ever regret updating.

Also, is it just me or auto-correct is worse and typing is harder???
light flashes? huh?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.