i don't get the obsession with HD TVs and such. my monitor had higher resolution back in 2004
And what did you watch on it?
i don't get the obsession with HD TVs and such. my monitor had higher resolution back in 2004
I just bought one on Sunday. A bit of an impulse buy really. Haven't opened it yet and really don't need it. I already have a mini running Plex for my (mostly) 1080p-encoded library. I bought it because I was thinking it'd be more "couch-friendly". But we've been getting by with mini/Plex for long enough that I think I'm gonna take it back and wait a few more months.
Is there a restocking fee at the Apple Store?
Get enough 1080p capableTV units in homes and some studio will be tempted to try a 1080p version of something in the iTunes store. If that's profitable, others will quickly follow. The problem now is that if EVERY studio wanted to test 1080p content rentals for
TV right now, it would be doomed to failure since none of the established
TV hardware can play it.
Soon after it's possible to make money, some studio will choose to try to make that money.
Except in the case of the iPad 2, that's debatable. For example, my six-year-old G4-based Mac mini can "play" 1080p content but it doesn't do it at all well which is mostly likely the case with all of the iOS products prior to the iPad 2 and Apple's A5 processor....iPhone 3GS/iPhone 4, iPad1/2, all support 1080p now...
If you read my last sentence, you'd see that was exactly my point... at 99$, there's no competition whatsoever. Why spend 249$ on a computer stuck in the living room when you can get a portable computer for the same price?
And if it's only a software/firmware update, then it means two things: no development cost/no need to build new hardware and it's already for sale everywhere.
I just bought one on Sunday. A bit of an impulse buy really. Haven't opened it yet and really don't need it. I already have a mini running Plex for my (mostly) 1080p-encoded library. I bought it because I was thinking it'd be more "couch-friendly". But we've been getting by with mini/Plex for long enough that I think I'm gonna take it back and wait a few more months.
Is there a restocking fee at the Apple Store?
We can't even get most of the movie studios to offer digital downloads at 720p when players that can handle it are readily available. What makes you think the hardware is what is holding the industry back? It should be pretty clear to you the fact that Blu Ray discs only offer 480p digital versions that hardware is not the problem here. And most aren't even offering that.
My logic goes like this:
- Don't ever put 1080p-capable
TVs into homes and there will NEVER be 1080p content for
TV in the iTunes store. Why? Impossible to play if the devices don't exist.
- Populate lots of homes with 1080p-capable
TVs and some studio will eventually be tempted to see if renting/selling 1080p can be profitable. If so, other "greedy" studios will quickly follow.
Personally, I could care less if there is ever 1080p options in the iTunes store; I want it for the ability to playback 1080 HD home movies I've been shooting for about 6+ years now.
If you are happy with 720p (or less), it should be no issue for you either, as 1080p hardware will play 720p to the fullest. But it doesn't work the other way.
Furthermore, if there was ever 1080p options in the iTunes store, I would expect them to just be options, much like there are options for 720p and SD options now. All the gripes about file sizes, storage, "the chart", time-to-download, etc can be addressed by each individual doing whatever is best for themselves. Win:win:win (Apple sells more units, "720p is good enough" crowd can still enjoy their 720p at it's fullest, "1080p or bust" crowd can finally get what they want too).
I don't consider apple serious about 1080p until they actually start offering it in their own itunes store.
would anyone that actually has the tv 2 go out and buy the tv3, just because it offers slightly better picture?
Except in the case of the iPad 2, that's debatable. For example, my six-year-old G4-based Mac mini can "play" 1080p content but it doesn't do it at all well which is mostly likely the case with all of the iOS products prior to the iPad 2 and Apple's A5 processor.
I have one of the original iPads (using the A4 processor) and while I can "play" 1080p content on that device it will randomly drop frames. I've done similar tests with the ATV2 and it also drops frames. Casual viewers might not notice these problems but from my experience they are present if you look close and try fairly demanding source videos.
The one thing we don't know is whether the A4 processor could be made to work given a restricted range of 1080p source encodings. What I mean is that maybe 1080p could be made to work (flawlessly) on these earlier devices if you kept the encoding settings within a fairly limited range of values. But, perhaps Apple has determined that given those limitations 1080p support on those earlier devices might not be sustainable (i.e. too many limitations on the encoding quality and workflow to produce that content).
It has been reported that a similar situation existed with the original Tegra 2 processor from NVIDIA. Boxee was planning on using that processor in the Boxee Box but even though that processor claimed 1080p support Boxee found that it just couldn't do high-bit-rate (quality) 1080p so they were forced to switch to an Intel-based system-on-a-chip (or SoC, the Intel CE4100). Interestingly enough, the graphic processor in the current Boxee Box is based upon the same GPU found in the iPhone 4 (the Imagination Technologies PowerVR SGX535). However, Intel added a custom HD decoder to their CE4100 which leads me to believe that they knew that the SGX535 wasn't really able to provide robust 1080p support (at least, not given the requirements of the Boxee Box and potentially other consumer HD products that could be based on Intel's CE4100).
Here is a link to a story that goes into great detail about Boxee's switch from Tegra 2 to the Intel CE4100:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/3912/boxee-box-the-inside-story/2
I toke mine back yesterday after I found out how bad netflix was. It was opened and they took it right back. Full refund no restock fee and were very nice about it. You gotta love the retail stores! Best service in the world.
stockcerts said:I just bought Apple TV yesterday. Is there a refresh coming soon that anyone is aware of? Thanks!
juicedropsdeuce said:September.
I agree, we may not see an Apple TV 3 until well into 2012.How do you know this?
ATV is one of those products that have not update cycle established. While I would love to see an update on the hardware front by September, I just would not be surprise if that doesn't happen for quiet some time.
How bad Netflix is? It works great on mine. Far better than anything else I've used for Netflix streaming, which is just about everything.
I was watching Annie Hall the other day and wished it was in 1080p.
Except in the case of the iPad 2, that's debatable. For example, my six-year-old G4-based Mac mini can "play" 1080p content but it doesn't do it at all well which is mostly likely the case with all of the iOS products prior to the iPad 2 and Apple's A5 processor.
I have one of the original iPads (using the A4 processor) and while I can "play" 1080p content on that device it will randomly drop frames. I've done similar tests with the ATV2 and it also drops frames. Casual viewers might not notice these problems but from my experience they are present if you look close and try fairly demanding source videos.
The one thing we don't know is whether the A4 processor could be made to work given a restricted range of 1080p source encodings. What I mean is that maybe 1080p could be made to work (flawlessly) on these earlier devices if you kept the encoding settings within a fairly limited range of values. But, perhaps Apple has determined that given those limitations 1080p support on those earlier devices might not be sustainable (i.e. too many limitations on the encoding quality and workflow to produce that content).
It has been reported that a similar situation existed with the original Tegra 2 processor from NVIDIA. Boxee was planning on using that processor in the Boxee Box but even though that processor claimed 1080p support Boxee found that it just couldn't do high-bit-rate (quality) 1080p so they were forced to switch to an Intel-based system-on-a-chip (or SoC, the Intel CE4100). Interestingly enough, the graphic processor in the current Boxee Box is based upon the same GPU found in the iPhone 4 (the Imagination Technologies PowerVR SGX535). However, Intel added a custom HD decoder to their CE4100 which leads me to believe that they knew that the SGX535 wasn't really able to provide robust 1080p support (at least, not given the requirements of the Boxee Box and potentially other consumer HD products that could be based on Intel's CE4100).
Here is a link to a story that goes into great detail about Boxee's switch from Tegra 2 to the Intel CE4100:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/3912/boxee-box-the-inside-story/2
Your mileage may vary. I've used an ATV2 on Cox cable with an advertised (and often measured) 8Mbps download rate and yet I've had intermittent problems with Netflix streaming. However, I have some reason to believe that the problems are because of Cox, not the ATV2.How bad Netflix is? It works great on mine. Far better than anything else I've used for Netflix streaming, which is just about everything.
would anyone that actually has the tv 2 go out and buy the tv3, just because it offers slightly better picture?
Ooohh. Are you a cool hipster?![]()