Because people are judging apps based on a beta OS. There might be as much as 5 betas until GM. Developers can't even submit apps based on anything in iOS 6. Bitching because an app does not work will fall on deaf ears until it is released.
Neither of my points was anything to the contrary.
I'll repeat them:
It's useful for two reasons:
1) Some people might update to iOS 6 and find that an app they really need doesn't work.
This is relevant NOW. Some people might be put off upgrading to the beta if they find out an App they use doesn't work. Skype didn't work in some of the iOS 5.0 betas - that was a pretty big deal for me, so I didn't upgrade
2) People can keep track of when/if these apps are updated to make them compatible.
I don't see what's wrong with this. If App x doesn't work, then they can easily see when/if an App is updated. Some older apps aren't maintained or the developer might want you to buy a newer version on the App Store.
My points only cover the period between now and the release, not anything beyond that.
This thread is not about "bitching", it's about observing.
Yes, I understand that. I guess I am not making my point clear. Developers know if their apps work on iOS 6 already. They installed it from the developer center and tested their own apps. Now if it does not work they are currently working to make sure it is ready for launch. There is no need to list those that work and those that don't.
Perhaps for some developers that will be the case, but it doesn't always work like that.
A lot of Apps are produced by development companies that a non-tech company hires to make their App. In that case, there won't be anyone sitting there twiddling their thumbs waiting for something to do. A fix will only be made at the request of the brand holder.