Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I've used Android and currently have a 4s running ios6 so I'll add what I can. To me the biggest advantage with Android is that processes can run in the background.

I gave the example of dropbox camera uploads in another post. With ios6 (I haven't read that 7 will be any different), I have to manually open the dropbox app every time I want to upload pictures to dropbox. With Android, I didn't have to do that. Take a pic and it automatically uploaded, no intervention from me at all.

With Android, I didn't have to worry if my podcasts were going to download in 10 minutes (when ios6 forced the app to shut off), the downloads happened in the background.

Those are two that personally affected my use of the phone and I don't believe, from what I've read, either will change with ios7.

Another poster asked if ios7 would allow to running apps at the same time, again, I don't see any way that happens in ios7 based on what I've read.

iOS 7 will allow apps to run in the background on a schedule depending on use, wifi, and power or through push notifications to process updates.

Personally, I do like the iphone and its simplicity, but IMO it is far more akin to an app launcher than a true operating system.

Which is the kind of argument that strains all credibility.

(And when did plopping the word "true" into a term cause it to mean "whatever made up definition that justifies my POV that I can't really put into words because if I do than it would be obvious that I was wrong.") ;)

The con to the Android implementation is supposed to be battery life. I can only comment that battery life was not an issue with my GS4, it was better than I get with my 4s.

The GS4 has an 80% larger capacity battery than the iPhone 4S. That's not in any way a measure of the efficiency of the software.

But it's a silly argument anyway. There is no question that running apps in the background uses more power than not.

The trade-offs for unlimited background processing are battery life, performance, security and process management. All areas where iOS has an advantage over Android.
 
my note ii can run 2 things at once. so what? ive never used it accept to try it. i have no desire to try to watch a video and check facebook. we can pay 100% attention to anything as it is
 

Those were my opinions and thoughts to the other poster. I wasn't making "arguments" and I wasn't trying to defend a particular OS and finally, I really wan't looking for third party commentary.

You seem a little too uptight about anyone being critical of ios 7s version of "multi-tasking".
 
Those were my opinions and thoughts to the other poster. I wasn't making "arguments" and I wasn't trying to defend a particular OS and finally, I really wan't looking for third party commentary.

And that was my reply to your post in a public forum. I also wasn't trying to defend a particular OS. I was taking part in a discussion of multitasking capabilities in iOS 7 by responding to what I felt were weak and factually incorrect arguments against the iOS 7 multitasking model.
 
And that was my reply to your post in a public forum. I also wasn't trying to defend a particular OS. I was taking part in a discussion of multitasking capabilities in iOS 7 by responding to what I felt were weak and factually incorrect arguments against the iOS 7 multitasking model.

Tell me what is incorrect about dropbox camera uploads not working in ios7 automatically? Is there a background process that is going to be allowed that when I take a picture it immediately and automatically gets updated to dropbox, without having to open the App?

Tell me what is incorrect about downcast shutting off after 10 minutes. Will ios7 allow downloads to continue after 10 minutes before shutting the app down?

Tell me what is incorrect about the poster who wants to use two running apps at the same time, will ios7 allow him to do that?

Tell what is factually incorrect about the GS4 I used for two weeks getting better battery life than my 4s. I don't give one iota about "software efficiency"; I only care my battery makes it through the day.
 
Tell me what is incorrect about dropbox camera uploads not working in ios7 automatically?

As I said, they can happen automatically on a schedule depending on use, wifi, battery life, and power or via push notification. You don't "have to manually open the dropbox app every time I want to upload pictures to dropbox."

Is there a background process that is going to be allowed that when I take a picture it immediately and automatically gets updated to dropbox, without having to open the App?

Nope. But you just added this part.

Tell me what is incorrect about downcast shutting off after 10 minutes. Will ios7 allow downloads to continue after 10 minutes before shutting the app down?

That's correct as far as I know. But it will now be able to update in the background before you even open it. Preferably while plugged in on wifi to save you battery life and data.

Tell me what is incorrect about the poster who wants to use two running apps at the same time, will ios7 allow him to do that?

Nothing. I was one of the posters who posted in favor of that feature.

Tell what is factually incorrect about the GS4 I used for two weeks getting better battery life than my 4s.

Nothing. It was just irrelevant to the point.

I don't give one iota about "software efficiency"; I only care my battery makes it through the day.

Yep. Which was a big problem for Android 3 years ago. Now that battery capacity has increased to the point that it's not a problem, Apple is expanding their multitasking model. Coincidence?
 
I've used Android and currently have a 4s running ios6 so I'll add what I can. To me the biggest advantage with Android is that processes can run in the background.

I gave the example of dropbox camera uploads in another post. With ios6 (I haven't read that 7 will be any different), I have to manually open the dropbox app every time I want to upload pictures to dropbox. With Android, I didn't have to do that. Take a pic and it automatically uploaded, no intervention from me at all.

With Android, I didn't have to worry if my podcasts were going to download in 10 minutes (when ios6 forced the app to shut off), the downloads happened in the background.

Those are two that personally affected my use of the phone and I don't believe, from what I've read, either will change with ios7.

Another poster asked if ios7 would allow two running apps at the same time, again, I don't see any way that happens in ios7 based on what I've read.

Personally, I do like the iphone and its simplicity, but IMO it is far more akin to an app launcher than a true operating system.

The con to the Android implementation is supposed to be battery life. I can only comment that battery life was not an issue with my GS4, it was better than I get with my 4s.

Thank you.

----------

Examples?

Skype, Tunein radio, any GPS app that stays active.
 
Actually, with iOS 7, they now have a service apps can hand off background downloads to, so they've solved the "app only has 10 minutes to download a big file" problem.

With background fetch, apps can apply to be opened periodically, so to use your example, Dropbox could register to be opened to check for new photos to be uploaded and then hand those uploads off to the background transfer service to be uploaded and quickly go back to sleep.
 

So that I'm straight on this; ios7:

- Can't automatically and immediately (I thought that was implied) upload pictures to dropbox. It will do it on the schedule it thinks best.

- You think, but are not sure, ios7 will allow downloads to continue past 10 minutes, for example downcast downloading podcasts will no longer have to stop downloading after the ridiculous 10 minute time limit.

- Cannot run two apps, (ie the running apps described by the other poster) at the same time

Is that correct?

----------

Actually, with iOS 7, they now have a service apps can hand off background downloads to, so they've solved the "app only has 10 minutes to download a big file" problem.

With background fetch, apps can apply to be opened periodically, so to use your example, Dropbox could register to be opened to check for new photos to be uploaded and then hand those uploads off to the background transfer service to be uploaded and quickly go back to sleep.

Good info. How often would dropbox be allowed to check for new photos. Could it be instant?
 
So that I'm straight on this; ios7:

- Can't automatically and immediately (I thought that was implied) upload pictures to dropbox.

Unless it is open.

It will do it on the schedule it thinks best.

Or on the schedule that the developer thinks best. I assume that a developer could even let a user schedule background time through notifications.

- You think, but are not sure, ios7 will allow downloads to continue past 10 minutes, for example downcast downloading podcasts will no longer have to stop downloading after the ridiculous 10 minute time limit.

No. I thought the 10 minute time limit is still there. DarkJaye claims there is a new service that will deal with this specific issue.

- Cannot run two apps, (ie the running apps described by the other poster) at the same time

Correct.
 
Yep. Which was a big problem for Android 3 years ago. Now that battery capacity has increased to the point that it's not a problem, Apple is expanding their multitasking model. Coincidence?

I'd argue it is coincidence. Apple's multitasking model turns every type of "background task" into an interface they have to put effort into implementing. That means work for them that they have to prioritize with all the other work on their plate. They got the big background tasks done, and then focused more on other features.

The tweaks in iOS 7's background processing model are there based on feedback and attacking specific issues with the platform (why can't I download a file in the background more reliably? why can't my RSS reader app update regularly? why can't my third-party e-mail client update without creating a Man-in-the-middle?). And note that the background updating feature comes in at roughly the same time OS X is getting features to help make background updates that apps do cost less battery. I wouldn't be surprised if iOS 7 is relying on similar tech to keep background fetch from causing too many problems.
 
Those were my opinions and thoughts to the other poster. I wasn't making "arguments" and I wasn't trying to defend a particular OS and finally, I really wan't looking for third party commentary.

You seem a little too uptight about anyone being critical of ios 7s version of "multi-tasking".

Third party commentary complain whilst on a public forum?? :confused:
 
In what way will the multitasking of iOS 7 differ from iOS 6, apart from the card view?
What does 'true multitasking' mean in iOS 7?

Thanks

You can actually do more than one thing at a time. With the exception of listen to videos, they took that away in iOS6. Quite odd.
 
iOS 7 - True multitasking

Multitasking has always been a smart way to switch between apps. Now it’s even smarter. Because iOS 7 learns when you like to use your apps and can update your content before you launch them.
 
If you look at the proccess listing on the phone using Xcode, you'll see that your phone runs a full kernel that is fully capable of running lots of processes. There's all kinds of internal deamons running.

Apple just limited the user intercation to one foreground app at a time and in addition created API's to limit the ability to run your own code in the background. (background task for downloads only, limited by hard deadlines)

The OS itself is absolutely capable of full multitasking.
It was a design decision to get the best user experience.

Consider just running one CPU hogging background task by some stupid App, this would immediately affect things like scrolling, loading images, etc. of the foreground app.

Even though task switching is widely understood and quite easy to implement, it's easy to abuse, especailly on mobile devices.

Battery life is the new CPU MHz.
 
All the improvements are irrelevant if you still cannot play audio from a video in the background from the browser or any other app, like it was possible in iOS 5.
 
All the improvements are irrelevant if you still cannot play audio from a video in the background from the browser or any other app, like it was possible in iOS 5.

You'd think they would've been putting that A6 chip to good use.
 
You'd think they would've been putting that A6 chip to good use.

Exactly, and you know what else surprises me? It's how few people knew that you could do that in iOS 5, and how handy it was.

I'm still on iOS 5 and it's really awesome when going to bed to open up Safari, go to YouTube, start a Carl Sagan documentary or some other interesting video, background it, make it play while browsing the web in Chrome.

That's multitasking. And Android cannot do that either.
 
Exactly, and you know what else surprises me? It's how few people knew that you could do that in iOS 5, and how handy it was.

I'm still on iOS 5 and it's really awesome when going to bed to open up Safari, go to YouTube, start a Carl Sagan documentary or some other interesting video, background it, make it play while browsing the web in Chrome.

That's multitasking. And Android cannot do that either.

Wow. Certain apps still do that, but there's been a definite degradation with YouTube apps in the past year. Soundcloud does it. Pandora does it. And some YouTube apps do it.
 
I asked because...well what do you expect?

If you leave an App running, what do you expect it to to? Use no power?

I understand this. It was my original point.

I like Apple's implementation of MT because apps that are fully active DO use power in the background. It is my impression that this would result in a lot of user management in an environment like Android
 
I understand this. It was my original point.

I like Apple's implementation of MT because apps that are fully active DO use power in the background. It is my impression that this would result in a lot of user management in an environment like Android

...but again, surely that's obvious?

If you tell an App to do something in the background, you should expect it to use battery.

The principle that Apple seems to work on is that people don't understand what they're doing with their phones.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.