Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Why not create a full manual setting within the Camera App? Why just leave this ability for third party Apps?

Mostly to see what happens in the wild. Opening up the manual controls creates a lot of opportunity for vertical use apps in specialized photography fields. I can easily see some low light camera apps with third party image processing getting a lot of use here.
 
I can easily see some low light camera apps with third party image processing getting a lot of use here.

Won't really happen. iOS8 doesn't add any new usable feature WRT low-light shooting; for example, the minimal shutter speed is still 1 sec. (Se my previous posts all around MacRumors for more info.)

Nevertheless, the new manual modes are still great.
 
Raw

What I really want from the iOS camera app is the ability to export raw image files so that I can process them in CaptureOne, Aperture or some other decent raw converter. The iPhone camera itself is good enough to make a difference.
 
What's the point? It's a phone, not a pro camera. Keep it simple, apple!

Whenever you have a platform of this distribution, it starts to fall into thousands of niches where someone is trying to make a buck coming up with a 50-cent solution in an expensive niche. I don't expect the camera app from Apple to change much but you'll see a bunch niche apps with bizarre specialties.
 
What's the point? It's a phone, not a pro camera. Keep it simple, apple!

As I've pointed out above, the current camera implementation simply doesn't allow for properly shooting under certain circumstances; for example, very fast-moving (e.g., running) subjects under bad light. A manual shutter speed priority (or the equivalent ISO priority) mode will help this tremendously - as has done on all competing mobile platforms for years.

----------

What I really want from the iOS camera app is the ability to export raw image files so that I can process them in CaptureOne, Aperture or some other decent raw converter. The iPhone camera itself is good enough to make a difference.

Exactly. Too bad RAW is still missing from iOS8. (Video, on the other hand, seem to support gibing access to the original, uncompressed video frames.)
 
It has a fixed aperture. I think f/2.2 or something like that. Having variable aperture like a DSLR lens would necessitate the lens being larger.

I don't know what the smallest variable/adjustable aperture lens would be.

I had no ideal and I learned something new today.
Thank you.
 
I see

When will I be able to take photographs of the norther lights with my iPhone ? Wil these new features help that out ?
 
Sorry to dissapoint you, but Nokia delivered months ago. :)

http://conversations.nokia.com/2013/10/29/another-nokia-first-digital-negatives-raw-dng-lumia/

http://conversations.nokia.com/2013/11/20/nokia-camera-raw-dng-support-available-now/

Lumia 1020, 1520, Icon/930 and probably all other future "Pureview" camera phones.
Luckily none of them was ever shipped with 8BG storage. 32GB or 16GB+MicroSD (up to 128GB)

And (almost?) all Lumia phones have manual control for shutter speed, aperture, focus, iso... from even earlier.

Thanks you for disappointing me!
 
That's why I don't have an iPhone. Most users want to "keep it simple" and Apple makes their dreams come true. Maybe these consumers would be better served with a Nokia 3310. It's simple as hell.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.