Comparing a month of data to about a week of new update...assuming users have already upgraded. Too early to jump to conclusions? Also, interesting to note what would have caused the spike in crashes across all versions on the 23rd?
Yeah, it's almost like an OS that had less features and was on less models with less complications, less sensors, less users, available in less countries and less carriers, etc would have less possibilities for bugs to pop up.Nice, but iOS 6 is more stable.
Um, you're right. Mainly because he will argue anything on a problem that you don't even haveHow do you equate number of people looking at a thread to number of people actually having a problem? If you are familiar at all with this "Internets" thingy, you will know that number of clicks correlates to social media noise, not reality.
I actually used to never use spotlight because it was so slow and showed irrelevant things to what I typed in, but now it's perfect.
The 9.3 is stable, because those that would be unstable would be stuck in the activation screen because the owner would not remember the password...
If it truly is "randomly" freezing, it's most likely a hardware error. OSX is still (unacceptably so, IMHO) extremely fragile to IO errors. Most likely your boot hard drive is slowly going bad; it's also possible, especially if you have a 5 year or older USB drive attached that the problem is in that drive (though generating OS crashes with a broken USB drive is a lot rarer than with a broken internal drive).
You could try using Disk Utility to check out the SMART status, but IMHO Disk Utility is kinda useless fro looking at SMART. I'd recommend DriveDX (costs, but has a one week free mode), and IMHO is worth the cost in terms of telling you exactly how your drive is dying.
If the drive IS dying, your options vary depending on the mac type and how old it is. If it's an older MacBook, you can easily swap out the drive. If it's a stationary mac you can buy an external drive (I'd REALLY recommend an SSD, but that's up to you), plug it in, then
- boot from the recovery partition
- install the OS onto the new drive, including restoring from Time Machine
- set your system to boot from the new (external) drive
- completely wipe the internal drive and mark it as an unused partition. (If you don't do this, the OS may still occasionally try to read from that drive, and you're back to the problem of random crashes.)
I agree, less bugs, more stable.Yeah, it's almost like an OS that had less features and was on less models with less complications, less sensors, less users, available in less countries and less carriers, etc would have less possibilities for bugs to pop up.
Greetings from iOS6. I have the data, its in my pocket every day. It did not crash like my friend's iOS9sIt sounds like it might very well be, but without a similar comparison of similar data it would be hard to say for sure.
Right, a very small anecdotal sample. Just as many people with iOS 9 haven't had crashes. Basically my comments about similar data being available would still apply.I agree, less bugs, more stable.
[doublepost=1461336504][/doublepost]
Greetings from iOS6. I have the data, its in my pocket every day. It did not crash like my friend's iOS9s
I think it is funny to read conflicting headlines on MR. This thread says 9.3 is the most stable.....yet they had to rush out 9.3.1 to fix bugs.
https://www.macrumors.com/2016/03/31/apple-releases-ios-9-3-1/
lol...I guess...but how can one be stable yet have a lot of bugs? Aren't those mutually exclusive?They said most stable, not bug free. :/
lol...I guess...but how can one be stable yet have a lot of bugs? Aren't those mutually exclusive?
I see your point. But mine is...if a software release is buggy...regardless of if they can or will be fixed makes it less stable. If the bugs affect user experience then it is not stable. If a release crashes once never to crash again...I would deem it more stable than a buggy release.Stable means fewer crashes. Sure, you have to fix bugs to get that, but the but they fixed with .1 wasn't crash related.![]()
Stability as far as it applies to software and all that (rather than a generic philosophical application) isn't the same as some visual inconsistency or some bug that doesn't produce the correct result somewhere or something else of that nature.I see your point. But mine is...if a software release is buggy...regardless of if they can or will be fixed makes it less stable. If the bugs affect user experience then it is not stable. If a release crashes once never to crash again...I would deem it more stable than a buggy release.
Agree, we need more data. But only Apple has themRight, a very small anecdotal sample. Just as many people with iOS 9 haven't had crashes. Basically my comments about similar data being available would still apply.