Blew the chance to go 16:9. More like iPhone, 11"Air and iMac, please.
I wanted the MacBook for the retina screen, but 16:10 is such a "wrong" aspect ratio for me.
Tsk. It doesn't matter.
Blew the chance to go 16:9. More like iPhone, 11"Air and iMac, please.
I wanted the MacBook for the retina screen, but 16:10 is such a "wrong" aspect ratio for me.
Blew the chance to go 16:9. More like iPhone, 11"Air and iMac, please.
I wanted the MacBook for the retina screen, but 16:10 is such a "wrong" aspect ratio for me.
For people like me that hate the iPad's size. The mini is cool for some stuff but the iPad really never fit into my lifestyle. Now a 12" will replace the Air for quick look ups and what not.Still at a loss as why Apple needs iPad Pro.
2048 is the same number of pixels as the current iPad in landscape mode. I think it shouldn't be too hard to adjust. Just take your existing iPad in portrait mode and extend it further.Ugh, new aspect ratio. terrible news for developers. But then again, the new multitasking features forces developers to test your auto layout in multiple aspect ratios for the iPad anyways.
16:9 is horrible for a tablet. Not least because the virtual keyboard would take up half the screen already.Blew the chance to go 16:9. More like iPhone, 11"Air and iMac, please.
I wanted the MacBook for the retina screen, but 16:10 is such a "wrong" aspect ratio for me.
The "pro" is for protruding.Anything running iOS should never have the word "pro" in the name.
Are you trying to hold it with one hand or something?Blew the chance to go 16:9. More like iPhone, 11"Air and iMac, please.
I wanted the MacBook for the retina screen, but 16:10 is such a "wrong" aspect ratio for me.
You're absolutely right. Problem is, the bean counter in charge of Apple these days realizes if they released a Surface-like competitor, it would cannibalize both their laptop and tablet markets. He'd rather sell you two products instead of one.Still at a loss as why Apple needs iPad Pro. I mean the tablet market in general has declined and what "professionals" are preferring today are hybrid devices like Surface Pro and detachable laptop touch screens. Not sure Apple truly understands that a tablet only with "casual" business applications may not be enough to kick start iPad sales again. I think Apple discriminating against hybrid devices is another poor decision that will come back to haunt them when their customer base demands an Mac Air hybrid with removable touch screen.
Apple seems to think professionals just want a bigger tablet screen, but professionals want to run REAL applications on a device that isn't based on a phone processor that can also double as a tablet when the need arises. Professionals don't want a backpack full of devices to choose from.
In this respect Microsoft was way more forward thinking then Apple. Merging their kernels into one universal OS will clearly cater to more products that professionals want, while Apple continues to fragment their OS for a bunch of add-on devices.
I can't imagine Apple wanting to push this iOS device as a "Pro" piece of hardware. My guess is they call it the iPad Plus
As long as there is no difference in function (like the 6 vs 6+) then I'd rather get an iPad air for portability.
Don't drink the bong water.They want to sell you a Mac and a IPad.
What about this:
-Release an iPad pro.
-Release a very thin metal keyboard with Mac/PC hardware in it.( like the keyboard part of the new MacBook ) that can connect to the iPad pro and can act like a cover.
-make it dual boot. Without the keyboard cover it only runs iOS .
-with the keyboard cover attached you can choose between OS X and iOS .
This way apple will sell more iPads, but will also sell macs.
Not to mention that Apple's been pushing developers to use Auto Layout for something like 4 years now, if I recall correctly. If they have to update their app for every new screen resolution ever, it's really their own damn fault at this point.Watching the WWDC session for iPad Multitasking. It is really not that hard.
Amazing!
Text will be awesomely crisp. And watching video will be seriously immersive. What's the equivalent tv screen size of a 13" iPad held at arm's length? Must be pretty big. Watching Supernatural and The Walking Dead on my 10" iPad is scary enough.
One would expect it to have a faster processor, more RAM, more battery, stuff like that. It wouldn't just be the same but with a bigger screen. (The 6+ has some advantages over the 6, BTW. They're not the same.)
Imagine the amount of back injuries we'll have with the introduction of a friggin 13" tablet.
Why is the iPad Pro rumored to include an NFC chip? Using an iPad Pro for Apple Pay would be even more cumbersome than the smaller iPad sizes. If this rumor is true, hopefully it means Apple is planning to allow developers to access the NFC chip!