Developers getting free access to millions of customers for a quick buck is getting tiresome.
I find it odd that no other platform has the same policy...
Developers getting free access to millions of customers for a quick buck is getting tiresome.
Meh, apple should stick to selling hardware, not controlling the universe.
Developers should stick to finding their own customers, not expecting a free ride to them.
I find it odd that no other platform has the same policy...
I find it odd that no other platform has the same policy...
Unfortunately it seems last few years the old good for user philosophy of Apple past, has been forgotten. Often it seems or at least appears as if Apple are being ultra dictatorial - and it's that which creates such animosity towards them and their products from some parties.
Whilst I support a lot of Apples design decisions (preservation of user experience), sometimes a few just baffle and create a real dichotomy (as they are at the expense of user experience).
If Apple want to force app developers from utilising Dropbox support, how about they stop being anal and actually incorporate iDisk style storage back into iCloud.
XBox Live is one example.
Android world is powered by advertising dollars. Hell, Google would love you to browse through the store all day.
XBox Live is one example.
Android world is powered by advertising dollars. Hell, Google would love you to browse through the store all day.
Sony's storefront is a money sink, they offer it for free to compete with Xbox.
Microsoft is likely to do the same with the window's app store. Hell, they are already paying developers to create window's phone versions for their apps.
So do they also get 30% of all sales from within the Amazon APP ?
If not you know they want it.
Apple goes too far.
Developers should stick to finding their own customers, not expecting a free ride to them.
Developers getting free access to millions of customers for a quick buck is getting tiresome.
No it's not.
Games consoles have always been closed platforms. Computers and mobile devices have not.
Apple getting millions of customers with their "there's an app for that" campaign thanks to the Developers is getting tiresome.
Blackberry.
Minus the fact Apple does zero real advertising for your App. NONE. You have to do it yourself.
30% for a credit card processor is an insane rate to pay. Look at the requirements. Apple demands 30% cut for a payment processor, you have to provide all the content on your end and upload it. Apple gives you less than a standard payment processor and charges you more.
What do you mean?
Blackberry devices have been able to sideload apps for a long time.
yea, ristlin is a troll
You FOOL! Apple isn't telling you NOT to get Dropbox. They are simply asking for a cut (from the developer) if you decide to get a Dropbox subscription via the App you found on the App Store.
Apple getting millions of customers with their "there's an app for that" campaign thanks to the Developers is getting tiresome.
How is that too far? You, the customer, could also buy the book directly from Amazon via their website on your iPhone. Apple is charging a premium for access to additional customers that have PROVEN to pay for goods. I don't hear the developers of Angry Birds complaining.
Just having it on the App store is a form of advertising that is FREE. You don't pay anything. You never pay anything. You only receive money.
Consider the 30% cut as part of the margin. If you think it is a lot, try manufacturing. You'll be happy with 10% profit off each sale.
Just having it on the App store is a form of advertising that is FREE. You don't pay anything. You never pay anything. You only receive money.