It was updated with current information—M2 iPad Air (2024).1.5 year old article bumped to the front page...
Are we experiencing some database corruption here too? Here come all of our "deleted" PRSI posts! 🤣
It was updated with current information—M2 iPad Air (2024).1.5 year old article bumped to the front page...
Are we experiencing some database corruption here too? Here come all of our "deleted" PRSI posts! 🤣
It was updated with current information—M2 iPad Air (2024).
Go back to your original post and ask yourself, "Who is going to find humor in this comment?"Thanks captain obvious. I was making a joke given the recent old photos situation. That being said it is reasonable to question how valuable the old posts are versus just starting a new article.
Go back to your original post and ask yourself, "Who is going to find humor in this comment?"
And then come back and say, "Sorry I put you through that. There is no humor there and I just wasted everybody's time for forcing them to read that."
On the other hand, by the time it gets problematic you simply could get the new base iPad. You'll enjoy a new chipset, guaranteed longer software support and updates, new warranty, new battery, trade-in value, etc.The key difference to me is the main chip. I plan to keep my apple devices for 5 or more years. The M2 chip will work for the next 5-7 years just fine (unless the integration of AI in the devices changes requirements to the CPU). The iPad air will be problematic in a few years from now. The other components are good enough for me, don't need a better screen or sound. I just wish they would have offered more exciting colors on the iPad Air.
Updating posts (rather than creating new posts) is a common SEO tactic that improves ranking in search engines, which is 99% of Macrumors goal with these type of posts—to increase inbound traffic 🤣LOL! Go back to my post and look at the emoji responses, I got a couple of laughs.
Move on if you didn't find it amusing.
Again, jokes aside, one can question if 1.5 year old posts are pertinent today.
Apple wants you to buy the most expensive iPad (or any other of its devices) that you can swing Financially. Therefore, it behoves them to limit the amount of RAM at the low end. Now, I do think the next Mini (and next base iPad) will have more powerful processors and possibly a bit more RAM. But don’t expect too much.While the A14 in the iPad 10 is no slouch for the tasks people would use a base iPad for, it's still a chip going on 4 years old and is constrained by its 4GB of RAM (compared to 8GB plus swap in the M1 and higher Pro and Air). That's going to become increasingly constrictive as RAM requirements increase.
Hopefully Apple updates the base model and the Mini to at least an A15/A16 with 6GB of RAM if not an A17 with 8GB. If Apple wants more complex pro-quality apps on the iPad (and subsequently the Vision Pro) then it needs to provide more RAM at the low end so developers can target every possible model.