Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'm convinced iPad 3 will be quadcore. But, in A9 core. That way, iPad 4 will use A15 with bigger leap in performance as some people suspect this alternating release similar to iPhone.
 
This can't be true... Then what could they possibly put in the iPad 4 thats coming in October?:rolleyes:
 
While I agree with you on the ability to detect small differences; the real issue is will such a difference be noticed over time? In general, the answer is no - people become used to the new dimensions and they then feel normal. So, unless you use an iPad2 and the (mythical slightly thicker) iPad3 interchangeably and swap often enough to retain the memory of the iPad2's thickness you will not likely notice the difference.
The original commentor to whom I was responding was not addressing that. He was only saying that you can't tell the difference of about a millimeter. Time was definitely not a part of his comment.

But you really can. You don't even need to hold the units at the same time. Pick one up, hold it, put it down, pick up the other one and hold it. You can tell.

Whether or not a given individual will get used to a particular thickness device is a totally separate discussion, but the original commentor did not direct attention to that train of thought. But there's really little to discuss about this latter issue. Some people will get used to it (and keep the new device), some won't (they'll return it, or keep it and just spend the rest of their lives complaining).

It's like any time you replace one thing with another, whether it be a hamburger, a beer, a pet, and automobile. Sure, there are differences between what you have now in your hands and what you used to have, and probably what you will have on another day. Is what you have in your hand good enough? It's up to the individual.

So saying that you can't tell the difference of 1mm thickness is wrong. Because we know that we will get people right here in this forum complaining about it. There will always be people griping, and we can count of many of them coming here to air their complaints, despite the fact that this site will not change the situation.
 
Last edited:
This will be one of the best selling products of any kind, of all time, even when it doesn't ship with all the specs mentioned.

But, the already overworked factories in China...there are going to be problems, maybe the first strikes.
 
Quad core?!?!??!??!!!!!!??????.....!!!!!!! That's insane.

Not very useful to have the fast processor, actually, until it becomes fast enough to work as a full PC. I guess you can play higher quality games. Wasn't it already dual-core, so how does adding another 2 cores help with app switching?
 
Anyone else mildly concerned about the Foxconn workers having to work inhuman hours to produce this tablet? Foxconn does not have a stellar record on treating their workers decently. Suicide rates at their factory are abnormal.

I just listened to the Mike Daisey interview on This American Life last week on iPads and Foxconn. Disturbing.
 
Anyone else mildly concerned about the Foxconn workers having to work inhuman hours to produce this tablet? Foxconn does not have a stellar record on treating their workers decently. Suicide rates at their factory are abnormal.

I just listened to the Mike Daisey interview on This American Life last week on iPads and Foxconn. Disturbing.

There are plenty of Chinese factories that treat their employees like dirt. It's not anything I can change at the moment, being under 18.
 
Yes -- it really does. BUT what I realized after they made the iPad 2 with only 512 MB of ram, is that the real problem is physical space. Since the iPad is basically a big battery with some chips strapped on, any additional space taken up by the RAM chips will reduce battery life substantially. There are two ways to go from 512 MB -> 1 GB of ram. Either you just double the number of RAM chips (which in most environments would be fine) or you have more RAM in the same amount of space. As far as I know, 1GB chips at the same size as 512MB chips are much more expensive than just getting more 512MB chips. So this is probably the real dilemma with regards to increasing RAM -- either you increase ram and decrease battery, or you increase ram and you increase price.

But you're missing the point about cost. Of course 1GB chips are more expensive thank 512MB chips. But Apple always waits until the price of the bigger/faster/better chip drops just enough to fit into their existing price structure. That time is likely here. That's why pricing of Apple models tends to stay relatively stable over time (I.e. the low/mid/high end model pricing of a given device in a given year stays about the same; there are exceptions, but this is the general trend).

Too many wishful thinkers in here. Macrumors should seriously ban this source.

Retina display - Most likely.

LTE and Quadcore? - Come on get real guys. Apple will milk you for your money before they give you this. Stop being all up on Apple's nuts and think realistically on what would be a money-making play on their part.

Re quad core you're missing the way Apple approaches marketing. They've not EVER yet made the processor a BIG part of marketing the iPad. Why would they start now? Apple has NEVER been about specs in its iDevice portfolio. They are about the overall user experience. If the quadcore chip fits into the existing low/mid/high model pricing structure, and provide an improved user experience, of course they will adopt it.

Re LTE, it's a simple function of whether or not integrated chips exist at a price, quantity and performance level (including battery drain) for the price structure discussed above. Many others throughout this thread have posted links to articles stating that such chips are due from the obvious sources in Q1 of this year.

Get ready for a significant price increase :(

Why? iDevice pricing has remained remarkably stable over the years. See above: Apple waits for the tech to "come to it" in terms of pricing, and in fact due to volume purchases has the ability to force the issue.

The original commentor to whom I was responding was not addressing that. He was only saying that you can't tell the difference of about a millimeter. Time was definitely not a part of his comment.

But you really can. You don't even need to hold the units at the same time. Pick one up, hold it, put it down, pick up the other one and hold it. You can tell.

Whether or not a given individual will get used to a particular thickness device is a totally separate discussion, but the original commentor did not direct attention to that train of thought. But there's really little to discuss about this latter issue. Some people will get used to it (and keep the new device), some won't (they'll return it, or keep it and just spend the rest of their lives complaining).

It's like any time you replace one thing with another, whether it be a hamburger, a beer, a pet, and automobile. Sure, there are differences between what you have now in your hands and what you used to have, and probably what you will have on another day. Is what you have in your hand good enough? It's up to the individual.

So saying that you can't tell the difference of 1mm thickness is wrong. Because we know that we will get people right here in this forum complaining about it. There will always be people griping, and we can count of many of them coming here to air their complaints, despite the fact that this site will not change the situation.

You're missing one important aspect, which is where that 1mm increase occurs. If it's literally throughout the entire device, then sure, you may be able to feel the difference (and I still only say 'may' because 1mm is extremely little - go check out a centimeter and divide it into tenths...) but if it only occurs in say the very center of the back, but the edges where you always hold the thing are the same as existing, then maybe you wouldn't ever notice it.
 
Now all we need is a flip keyboard that connects to it wirelessly on the Smart Cover and some (wireless?) connection to a Cinema Display. I'm sure this can also run Mac OS X if it was recompiled for these processors.

----------

Re quad core you're missing the way Apple approaches marketing. They've not EVER yet made the processor a BIG part of marketing the iPad. Why would they start now? Apple has NEVER been about specs in its iDevice portfolio. They are about the overall user experience. If the quadcore chip fits into the existing low/mid/high model pricing structure, and provide an improved user experience, of course they will adopt it.

Completely true. Apple is smart enough to know that processor speed and even 4G is not a big thing to care about. As it is, >50% of the iPhone users in a survey think the iPhone 4(s) has 4G :D

Meanwhile, Sprint was saying in their ad: "Download it faster than you can say 2.5GHz, which is super fast by the way!" That is the wavelength, not a data rate...
 
Wait for the iPad5

Wait, April at the latest.

Rumors are great to get people to put off buying Apple products. As soon as the next iPad ships, rumors will start in the next one. It's so good to have paid bloggers generating rumors based on nothing and paid commentors trolling blog sites to make silly comments. I guess that is one thing SOPA will help curtail along with free speech in general.
 
Rumors are great to get people to put off buying Apple products. As soon as the next iPad ships, rumors will start in the next one. It's so good to have paid bloggers generating rumors based on nothing and paid commentors trolling blog sites to make silly comments. I guess that is one thing SOPA will help curtail along with free speech in general.
No one will advise you to wait for the iPad 4 if the iPad 3 has only been launched for five weeks. The advise of waiting is only given to those who are planning to buy a product almost a year after it received its last upgrade.

If anyone asks right now "buy an iPhone 4S or wait for iPhone 5?", than 9 out of 10 people will recommend to buy the iPhone 4S now. If this same question is asked in June, than the advise will most likely be something like "wait for WWDC, see if Apple announces the next-gen iPhone, if not, buy iPhone 4S because than it will be October". If this same question is asked in August or September, than 9 out of 10 people will recommend you to wait.
 
I would have a hard time believing it would be thicker, but it's definitely more likely now than it would have been a few years ago. Steve Jobs would never have let a regression like that happen. They made a huge deal out of the second one being so much thinner. Heads would have rolled if the engineers tried to tell him that they needed to make the new one thicker.

There have been plenty of times an Apple product was thicker than the outgoing product in the Steve Jobs era. It's happened with laptops and the iPhone 3G was thicker than the original iPhone.
 
Well, they will need to provide much better connectivity and a file management system if they ever want to be taken seriously as a computer replacement.

You are thinking backwards. First it is computer and it already replaces tradidional computers. Second file management system is something simple users and simple tasks do not require.

If i can make procedure of opening files simpler without browsing tree of files then it's a step forward.
 
There have been plenty of times an Apple product was thicker than the outgoing product in the Steve Jobs era. It's happened with laptops and the iPhone 3G was thicker than the original iPhone.
Indeed, the only reason Steve Jobs wanted all of his products thinner, is not because he just wanted to, but to push his engineers.

When the iPhone 3G was released, that was as thin as possible for the engineers to create.
 
There seems to be lots of folks comparing apples to oranges. The iPad is not a phone. All it needs is a data modem. It doesn't do either legacy or LTE voice. There are already parts on the market that do that (e.g., power LTE modem products with a Qualcomm MDM9600 )

There is some credible speculation that Apple is waiting on the 28nm based LTE with voice solutions for the iPhone. For example:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4925/why-no-lte-iphone-5-blame-28nm-maturity
The MDM9615 also adds TD-SCDMA ( http://www.qualcomm.com/media/relea...-market-ltedc-hspa-chipsets-mobile-broadband- ) So , if pandering to the proprietary Chinese market is an issue, that would be another upside to waiting.


While it might boost Apple's profit margins to just use one solution for both (e.g., a MDM9615 in iPad3 and iPhone5), there is not a huge technical raise why. One of the factors of "LTE having power demands" is not that it is LTE radio per se, but the fact you need two solutions to the problem (both a LTE and legacy radio). In the modem, context you don't. Indeed, if both iPads and iPhones sell in huge numbers it might make sense not to soak up MDM9615 availability with iPads.

It is more a cost and time problem because Apple will have to build and qualify two different radios if go with a separate solution for the iPad3. That will cost them more money. Additionally, Apple can probably get the part, MDM9615, cheaper if buy it in larger bulk.

P.S. if people are worried about FDD-LTE vs. TDD-LTE ... gobi 4000 is available.

http://www.qualcomm.com/media/relea...-availability-gobi-4000-platform-4g-lte-conne

it is a modem looking for in iPad; not a phone.

I'm glad that I could spawn off your thoughts - although I didn't get an answer
 
You guys who want more RAM, you need to consider that it takes battery life to preserve the RAM contents when the iPad is OFF. Below is a great article (from Microsoft!) explaining why portable devices with more RAM struggle to even come close to the iPad. The individual memory cells need to remain energized so the states of the various applications can be preserved. I really don't think Apple's being cheap here, I think they're (as usual) trying to create the best overall user experience.

http://www.appleinsider.com/print/1...ne_4s_motivated_by_battery_life_concerns.html

You only suspend RAM states when it is sleeping, not off. Furthermore, I think Microsoft is over-playing the importance of RAM amount in battery life. It's going to help by virtue of more efficient processing, but refresh cycles aren't that expensive. Too little RAM can also hurt you when you're purging data for space and having to constantly reload it to RAM (safari tabs for example).

Moreover, they could try something novel like only suspending to half the RAM and not refreshing the rest.

A quad-core chip based on Cortex A9 architecture would be faster than a dual-core chip based on A15 architecture. I highly doubt Apple will go ahead with A15 based design without extensively testing it first. I could be wrong though.

It depends on the workload, but the A15 would be faster in most situations. ARM has stated the cores are 40% faster clock for clock and they are triple issue instead of dual issue like the A9. Finally, they have a deeper pipeline, which means they can be clocked faster, albeit with flushes being more expensive.

A15 is all speculation. The design doesn't even go into production until late this year with first product hitting in 2013.

Samsung's A15 SoC will go into production next quarter and we will likely see the galaxy s3 in q3.

I'd presume that the A15 would only be faster than a Quad A9 for applications that aren't multiprocessor aware beyond dual core processor. At a presume 20% speed advantage per clock the A15 would have to clock MUCH higher than a Quad Core A9 to best it in many circumstances.

A lot of desktop workloads aren't even parallel enough to fully use a quad core yet. The instances where a quad A9 will be faster than a dual A15 will be very limited.
 
Time to upgrade my iPad 1. ;)

I hope it's available w/more memory, especially storage (128 gb).

I wonder when we will be able to pre-order.


.
 
1mm thicker ain't no big deal...

I find it funny how some are complaining about a possible 1mm increase in thickness to accomidate the HD retina screen. LOL. Seriously? Thats like complaining on a friggin sub-atomic level! You won't even notice or be able to feel a difference holding the ipad 3. Have people run out of things to complain about? Cause this is ridiculous.

You do realize that a product can't continue to get thinner to infinity. Don't you? I mean, There comes a point when thin actually becomes TOO thin. Like when a super model is nothing but skin and bones and has to be hospitalized. It just doesn't become practical anymore. People who are obsessed with Apple products getting thinner have a form of mental sickness if you ask me.

Making the ipad 3 1mm thicker(if this rumor is even true) ain't no big deal. Especially if it makes room for a super cool HD retina display and faster chip. Any rational Apple fan will take those features over a 1mm increase in thickness.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.