Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Wow!! It appears that Apple actually has you believing that no SD memory slot is in your own best interest :eek:

The reality is that, Apple dose not include an SD slot because they make MORE money when you pay an extra $100 for an extra 16GB of memory. They definitely aren't trying to do you any favours. It's all about the mighty dollar!! :D:apple: Oh .... and it might also have something to do with digital rights management.

Cheers.

The Connection Kit is actually a better option IMO. It allows for the iPhone to connected as well. Of course the best option of all is wifi sync. How long is it going to take Apple to implement this. The Zune has had this for awhile.
 
The Connection Kit is actually a better option IMO. It allows for the iPhone to connected as well. Of course the best option of all is wifi sync. How long is it going to take Apple to implement this. The Zune has had this for awhile.

or bluetooth... I'm flexible, but I'd love to be able to move data between devices one way or another without having to worry about adapters and cables. The less I have to carry around and remember the better!
 
or bluetooth... I'm flexible, but I'd love to be able to move data between devices one way or another without having to worry about adapters and cables. The less I have to carry around and remember the better!

good point - would love "over the air" syncing - adapters become quite clunky very quickly
 
How is an ipad easier to carry than a laptop?

Easily just slide it into a leather portfolio and carry it with you?

How is it not 5x easier to carry than a laptop?

Just because you make up imaginary restraints to carrying it doesn't change the reality.

You have to carry a 24" external monitor and a full size keyboard and bluetooth mouse to get any work done on a laptop. So compare that into your carrying factor for a laptop as well.
 
Easily just slide it into a leather portfolio and carry it with you?

How is it not 5x easier to carry than a laptop?

Just because you make up imaginary restraints to carrying it doesn't change the reality.

You have to carry a 24" external monitor and a full size keyboard and bluetooth mouse to get any work done on a laptop. So compare that into your carrying factor for a laptop as well.

That argument makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Newsflash: in no way will working on an ipad be easier than working on a notebook. You'd have to carry all that stuff for an ipad too (not that it would work...). The point is that the footprint of an ipad is not significantly smaller than that of a small notebook, and small notebooks don't weight much anyway these days. One way or another you still need a tote bag of some sort to carry it since it sure isn't fitting into your pocket, and at that point, why not bring a fully-functional notebook?
 
Seems to me it's pretty lame Apple didn't put an USB port on the iPad. This connection kit is just a dumb hardware kit, the logic for the camera is in the software. If they put a USB port on the iPad then no need for an additional $30 spent and no need for a separate easy to lose adapter.
 
I wonder about RAW support. Even if there is no editing ability... I wonder if it will at least show a preview of a RAW file... and hopefully at least allow copying them off of an SD card / camera.

I'm mainly interested in using the iPad to get a larger "preview" of images while I'm in the field... so if there is no RAW support I suppose I'll just shoot RAW+Jpeg and preview the jpegs... but that is certainly not ideal.

I guess all will be answered shortly...

I doubt this. Even Photoshop CS4 cant open Nikon RAWs (actually NEFs but they are RAW files) by default, you have to install a plugin. How do you install plugins for the iPad? Make it as an App that runs a script? We can only hope someone will make that, and then we can hope Apple will approve it, which they wont.

The other possibility is that RAW support is built in. Strangely, Apple doesnt list supported picture formats on the specs tab for iPad, only video, audio and mail attachments.

Its a shame, bacause if its one thing the iPad could do great, its being some sort of picture database for photographers on the go (yes, even pros).

Im talking about people that wait with photoshopping until they come home, but needs a device that is small and light -- and still has a great, accurate screen with good contrast, which it seems like the iPad has. Also, photojournalists that needs to send back pictures from the field in a hurry dont do photoshopping themselves anyway. A lot of these actually use netbooks with internet USB sticks now. They need light, not processing power, and they dont need the keyboard for scrolling, viewing and sending the best photos back to the editorial staff.

Yes, the iPads will be great as "picture-frames" for showing family jpeg-photos in the living room (it even looks like a picture frame), but pro and enthusiast photographers will probably have to look at the competition.

Which is a shame, because with a good screen for viewing, acceptable storage space, built-in 3G and upload-via-mail support, this device is actually very much like what many photographers is looking for -- its just missing that little extra, probably RAW support (and no way to install plug-ins) and certainly no built-in support for CF or SD cards -- although the latter could be solved if some 3rd party makes a CF to dock connector plug.
 
The Connection Kit is actually a better option IMO. It allows for the iPhone to connected as well. Of course the best option of all is wifi sync. How long is it going to take Apple to implement this. The Zune has had this for awhile.

Exactly HOW does an iPhone connect? The other end camera connector is the small 'D' style connector.
Again, does anyone know for a fact that the iPhone can connect directly to the iPad for photo xfer (or any other reason?)
 
What I want to know is will it mount on the desktop and interface with the finder not just to transfer photos. If so then you can essentially have unlimited storage and there'd be less of a need to buy the larger internal storage.
 
Typical dick move from Apple. Seriously, would it have been so hard to include a SDHC slot and/or a USB port? Oh right, couldn't sell those silly adapters otherwise. But go ahead and point and laugh at Microsoft for having 18 different versions of their OS.
 
I think an SD card reader should have been built in... think it would have made a lot of people happier including myself.

Of course it should have, however Apple was more concerned about design and money grabbing than actual function.
 
Typical dick move from Apple. Seriously, would it have been so hard to include a SDHC slot and/or a USB port? Oh right, couldn't sell those silly adapters otherwise. But go ahead and point and laugh at Microsoft for having 18 different versions of their OS.

+1

And don't forget, it could not be any simpler! Seems almost like the promised MacBook Wheel v2.0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BnLbv6QYcA&feature=channel

(the only promise not fulfilled being the lack of screen). :D:D
 
Exactly HOW does an iPhone connect? The other end camera connector is the small 'D' style connector.
Again, does anyone know for a fact that the iPhone can connect directly to the iPad for photo xfer (or any other reason?)

You should reread it again. The kit comes with two connectors: one with USB port and 1 SD card slot.
 
What I need to know is how I can put hundreds of PDFs on the pad. Email is not an option as I have gigs of PDFs.
 
Wow as I thought this couldn't get anymore dumber.
WHy not just install the damn camera internally instead of making a kit for it?:mad:

Careful who you call dumb. Do you really think most people would use their iPhone or iPad as their only means of taking and storing pictures? The kit is made to transfer photos, not take them. Have you ever taken pictures with something other than the iSight on your iMac or Mac book and then loaded them on your computer? Your post suggests you haven't.

Please. Try to think two inches outside of the box.
 
You should reread it again. The kit comes with two connectors: one with USB port and 1 SD card slot.

Right. The USB kit is a connector with male dock connector on side and female USB on the other.
How does this help an iPhone? The iPhone doesn't have a USB connector on it. It has a femal dock connector.
Is the assumption that you'll need to buy a USB kit for the iPhone side as well, and string a usb between them?

What's needed is a dock-to-dock connector to connect iPad to iPhone for xfer.
I think those saying this allows iPhone to iPad photo xfer need to look again.
 
Right. The USB kit is a connector with male dock connector on side and female USB on the other.
How does this help an iPhone? The iPhone doesn't have a USB connector on it. It has a femal dock connector.
Is the assumption that you'll need to buy a USB kit for the iPhone side as well, and string a usb between them?

What's needed is a dock-to-dock connector to connect iPad to iPhone for xfer.
I think those saying this allows iPhone to iPad photo xfer need to look again.

Please feel free to correct me if I'm mistaken, I don't have an iPhone...but I do have an iPod touch... My USB charging cable for the touch connects to the base of the ipod and has a standard male USB at the end to plug into my computer... with the iPad Camera kit USB dongle it gives the iPad a USB female port that my standard charging cable can connect to... no new wires... is it different for the iPhone?
 
I doubt this. Even Photoshop CS4 cant open Nikon RAWs (actually NEFs but they are RAW files) by default, you have to install a plugin. How do you install plugins for the iPad? Make it as an App that runs a script? We can only hope someone will make that, and then we can hope Apple will approve it, which they wont.

The other possibility is that RAW support is built in. Strangely, Apple doesnt list supported picture formats on the specs tab for iPad, only video, audio and mail attachments.

Its a shame, bacause if its one thing the iPad could do great, its being some sort of picture database for photographers on the go (yes, even pros).

Im talking about people that wait with photoshopping until they come home, but needs a device that is small and light -- and still has a great, accurate screen with good contrast, which it seems like the iPad has. Also, photojournalists that needs to send back pictures from the field in a hurry dont do photoshopping themselves anyway. A lot of these actually use netbooks with internet USB sticks now. They need light, not processing power, and they dont need the keyboard for scrolling, viewing and sending the best photos back to the editorial staff.

Yes, the iPads will be great as "picture-frames" for showing family jpeg-photos in the living room (it even looks like a picture frame), but pro and enthusiast photographers will probably have to look at the competition.

Which is a shame, because with a good screen for viewing, acceptable storage space, built-in 3G and upload-via-mail support, this device is actually very much like what many photographers is looking for -- its just missing that little extra, probably RAW support (and no way to install plug-ins) and certainly no built-in support for CF or SD cards -- although the latter could be solved if some 3rd party makes a CF to dock connector plug.

I'm not sure I understand your logic here. Aren't many of the people that need to get pictures out quickly actually shooting jpegs. As far as I understand it:

I still don't get this no support for CF cards bit. The connection kit comes with 2 dongles. One is for SD and the other is USB. A card reader may or may not work in the USB but certainly your camera will. That is why it is called a CAMERA connection kit! I don't usually connect up my camera but I have done it before and if it is one that is CF, I will just carry the camera's USB cable with me.

If a pro needs to send back files in a hurry, I am pretty sure they are sending back jpegs. That should be a piece of cake on the iPad. At the very least you can load them up to mobile me and have the people at home copy them down.

Why is everyone making this so hard to think about?
 
What I need to know is how I can put hundreds of PDFs on the pad. Email is not an option as I have gigs of PDFs.

When you dock the iPad to your PC or Mac, you can drag files between the two devices, just like you can on many of the older iPods.

I'm on the fence about getting the connector kit. I might pick it up just to have the option.

My Camera unfortunately uses Memory Stick cards, I'll have to fool around with USB.

Has anyone confirmed that this kit works on the iPhone as well? That would seal the deal for me, as I'm more likely to be out taking pictures with my iPhone, than with my iPad.
 
Today's sermon....

But, but, but. I thought that the turtlenecked overlord convinced
us that Flash was bad.

Now they're putting Flash on the Ipads! Thank goodness that the
overlord doesn't let dogma get in the way of what the customers
need.

Blessed are those who practice what they preach. :)
 

Attachments

  • Aiden Shaw.png
    Aiden Shaw.png
    242.5 KB · Views: 109
When you dock the iPad to your PC or Mac, you can drag files between the two devices, just like you can on many of the older iPods.

Yes, but this isn't an older iPod, its an oversized Touch. And, like the iPhone, you can't use it as a mass storage device. So, just dragging PDFs into a iPad icon isn't going to happen, not unless Apple lets you drag-and-drop these PDFs into iTunes. He'll have to do it over WiFi (like what is done with Airsharing and the like) most likely.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.