Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Go to backmarket.com and buy a used ipad or imac. Stop directly giving apple money. They don't learn.
 
While the iPad is a "touch-first device," the Mac is designed for "indirect manipulation," with a mouse or keyboard, which is a point that Apple has reiterated several times over the years.

Whoa, the Mac is designed for indirect manipulation like with a mouse or keyboard!
 
  • Wow
Reactions: rjjacobson
Apple’s comments actually make me want to cancel my order as it crushes hope for any semblance of a hybrid OS. They want a complimentary device yet charge more than the main device and create accessories to simulate a main device use case. Might as well use the iPad as a second monitor and control it with my MBA.

At least we know some of Apple’s real intentions.
 
Yep, Launchpad on Mac was the start
To be fair app launching has been a longstanding deficiency on Mac versus Windows. On System 7 and prior apps would just install wherever on your root directory, good luck finding them! Mac OS 8 and higher tried to organize things with an Applications folder (and if you were smart you threw that folder into your Apple Menu Items system folder), and said folder organization exists to this day in Mac OS X/macOS (put your Applications folder in the Dock and set the display to List). But there's never been a universal way to see all apps installed on your system until Launchpad. You can argue it's flawed but it's at least something.
 
The only reason the iPad is complementary to the Mac is because Apple is artificially limiting the potential of the iPad, which has the same hardware as the base MacBook Air, so we know it can run macOS without a problem.
There are numerous fallacies in this. They have the same SoC, but an SoC isn’t the whole computer. Also, the batteries are much smaller and the thermals are much worse than a MBA. It’s also a touch device whereas macOS and all of its apps are touch hostile. Sure it could run macOS, but it would suck badly. Craig F. even said so years ago, saying they had macOS running on iPads. They tested it and found the experience to be pretty bad. Apple doesn’t deliberately ship awful experiences (note I said deliberately).

Aside from bad user interfaces, Apple spent years implementing battery saving techniques, such as not permitting background operations and indirect server-based notification methods. Stick macOS on an iPad and all that goes out a window. If you want an overheating device with a 2-hour or less battery life, go for it. It’s indisputable an iPad is a lesser animal than a MBA, something everyone acknowledges is for light computing and not for ultra-powerful apps. Yet somehow people here seem to think a lesser device than a MBA can be turned into the ultimate laptop that competes with a high end MacBook Pro. The Pro name just means it’s the highest end of the iPad line. That doesn’t make it on the level of a MacBook Pro. The lesson here is be careful of what you ask for. You might get it… and regret it.
 
So all of that “this is a computer” stuff several years ago was just…marketing!?
”Computer” does not equal “laptop”. People misread what Apple was going for in that ad. Prior to that ad, most people considered iPads to be toys, only to be handed down to little kids. Apple wanted people to consider the iPad when deciding on what computer to buy next. Prior to that, people would think laptop or desktop. Apple wanted people to now think laptop, desktop, or iPad. The iPad is a computer, but is not a laptop. Nor is a laptop a desktop, but both are computers. All three have overlapping features, but all three have their strengths and weaknesses. A desktop is the ultimate powerful machine (just consider sticking an M2 Ultra in a laptop, i.e. not happening). A laptop is portable with most of the power of a desktop. A tablet is an ultraportable computer with touch features, and tends to have instantaneous response.
 
”Computer” does not equal “laptop”. People misread what Apple was going for in that ad. Prior to that ad, most people considered iPads to be toys, only to be handed down to little kids. Apple wanted people to consider the iPad when deciding on what computer to buy next. Prior to that, people would think laptop or desktop. Apple wanted people to now think laptop, desktop, or iPad. The iPad is a computer, but is not a laptop. Nor is a laptop a desktop, but both are computers. All three have overlapping features, but all three have their strengths and weaknesses. A desktop is the ultimate powerful machine (just consider sticking an M2 Ultra in a laptop, i.e. not happening). A laptop is portable with most of the power of a desktop. A tablet is an ultraportable computer with touch features, and tends to have instantaneous response.
My older 2019 MacBook Pro definitely feels snappier than my M1 iPad Pro, especially when multitasking. iPadOS feels like computing through molasses.
 
If the Mac and iPad are supposed to compliment each others ability, why isn't there uniformity of use between the two? The VP's rhetoric doesn't align with current Apple use reality, in my opinion.
Huh? Complement does not mean they do all the same things. To complement means they do different things that help the other. By definition that means they don’t do all the same things.
 
“We see them as complementary devices."

Complementary as in please purchase both. When the first iPad was released, it seemed like Apple was positioning the iPad as the eventual successor to the Mac. That was the impression we got from Steve, Apple commercials and other sources at Apple. Maybe it would take a decade or so, but eventually it would happen. Now it’s a complementary device. In other words we couldn’t really figure out how to optimize the software for the iPad or maybe it’s just more lucrative for us not to.
 
There aren’t that many people who want macOS. You’re living in a tech bubble with tech diehards who want to manipulate Terminal settings. The 99.9% of regular people like iPadOS just the way it is. They don’t want a Mac. They want the ultra portability and simplicity of iPadOS. IPadOS is just fine and doesn’t need any fundamental changes.

When I’ve surveyed people in the past, it isn’t iPadOS that people want a change to. They want to run Mac programs because they tend to be more mature than their iPad counterparts. That isn’t the OS. That’s the apps. People may ask why iPad apps (some) can run on macOS while Mac apps cannot run on iPadOS, it’s because of sandboxing. macOS supports sandboxing, but is not enforced. IPadOS requires sandboxing, which very few Mac apps support. Mac apps are allowed to range all over the file system while sandboxing prevents that and would break Mac apps. That’s why Terminal and Finder are forbidden and will never happen and why Apple threw in Stage Manager instead of Finder. Finder just isn’t possible. If Apple were to change sandboxing, it would essentially be a complete rewrite of iPadOS since that is a core security feature of their mobile OS’es. If Apple had the opportunity to redo macOS, they’d make it more like iPadOS rather than the other way around. But the horse left that barn decades ago. Rewriting macOS would break almost all existing Mac apps.

Keep in mind Macs have been around for almost four decades with macOS being around for 20 years or so. IPadOS is very new with programmers, unfamiliar with how to write touch-first apps. There’s a steep learning curve, hence the slower pace of iPad apps. It’s flat out hard to write touch programs. Stalwarts like Photoshop promised fully desktop features, but it’s been three years and counting. Final Cut Pro is still missing plugins but is slowly moving forwards. DaVinci Resolve ported all their desktop tabs but hid all but two because they aren’t sure how well they’d work in a touch environment.

So it’s not really iPadOS that people have a beef with. It’s that they own Mac programs they want to run. But consider this, people knock the MacBook Air for throttling and poor performance with high end Mac apps and consider the MacBook Air to be more of a casual consumer device. The iPad Pro is a lesser beast than even the MacBook Air with smaller battery and poorer thermals, yet people here want the iPad Pro to run software that would make an M3 Max MBP sweat. Even if it were to run macOS where Apple shockingly makes it touch-friendly (it’s not in the least), no Mac apps are touch friendly. This is the same curse that hits Surface Pros. MS has tried since Vista to make a successful hybrid and has failed. One of the big reasons is the lack of touch friendly apps. Nobody wants to be tethered to a mouse and keyboard on a tablet, because it’s no longer a tablet if you do that. So why bother making an inferior device to a MacBook Air into a MacBook Pro? It’s a recipe for disaster, which is why Apple won’t do it. They’re not stupid enough to not see a disaster in the making, just watching Microsoft flail. It’s not that they’re out of touch with the people. They know exactly what most people want. MacOS isn’t it except with a small subset of the perpetually online geeks.
If “Pro” stands for “Professional, the new 13“ iPad Pro should offer the option to run OSes — M4 and OLED is not enough.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stormshadow


For her review of the new M4 iPad Pro, The Wall Street Journal's Joanna Stern spoke with Tom Boger, Apple's vice president of iPad and Mac marketing. Stern focused on comparing the iPad Pro to a MacBook, and asked some targeted questions about the way Apple views the two devices.

magic-keyboard-1.jpg

According to Boger, Apple sees the iPad Pro and Mac as devices that are meant to be used alongside one another. "We don't see them as competing devices," he said. "We see them as complementary devices." While the iPad is a "touch-first device," the Mac is designed for "indirect manipulation," with a mouse or keyboard, which is a point that Apple has reiterated several times over the years.

"macOS is for a very different paradigm of computing," he went on to explain after Stern asked about the possibility of running Mac apps on the iPad or a Mac with a touch screen. Boger said that many Apple customers have both devices, and use the iPad to "extend" Mac work with Continuity.

When asked if Apple would ever change its mind on a touch screen Mac, he didn't say no. "Oh, I can't say we never change our mind," he told Stern.

Stern traded her MacBook for an iPad for her review, and said that the iPad was better for portability, touch, and 5G connectivity, a feature not available on the Mac. The Mac offered superior port options (it has more than one), better software and multitasking, longer battery life, and better multi-display support.

Stern's full review and interview with Boger can be read over at The Wall Street Journal.

Article Link: iPad Marketing VP: iPad and Mac are Complementary Devices, Not Competing Devices
The new 13 inch iPad „Pro“ has a processor and a display that is more advanced than those in most of the current M2/3 laptops and iMac. I would replace my M2 12.9 iPad Pro with the new 13 if it ran MacOs in addition to iPadOS — yes, i want the option to switch between both. Until then, „Pro“ stands for „Provisional“, not „Professional“. If I were able to use both , I could be more „Pro“ductive and it would truly complement rather than compete with my 14“ M3 Max laptop & Studio Display setup.
 
I think we all know what THAT means. They’re saying if you NEED something today the iPad doesn’t do, but the Mac does, get a Mac. (or, maybe, get something non-Apple, like they told folks who were looking for a tower and got a trash can) They’ve brought over all the functionality that they feel fits the device they want to make in the future (i.e., they want to make all locked down devices).

I suppose this should also clear the deck for all of those folks thinking that THIS is the year “filesystem” comes to iPad (yes, yes, I know it has a filesystem, but that’s what folks say) at WWDC. What I think would actually be an interesting point of view is a review by someone that’s NOT pining for macOS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ludatyk
Has anyone asked an Apple executive why they don't offer cellular on MacBooks?
Complimentary, in this case, means an iPad can be a hot spot for a MacBook. Thing A does stuff, thing B does different additional stuff and, if a user so desires, they can use both for added benefit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ludatyk
Complementary? How out of touch with reality can you be? A loaded iPad Pro is $2900! That’s not a complementary product. A small % of consumers are not purchasing both a Mac and iPad Pro at those costs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stormshadow
Reads to me like they're digging their feet in on iPadOS being iPadOS.
The sad part is really that iPadOS really doesn't stand on its own two legs.

The hope everyone had when Apple split iPadOS off from iOS was that the iPad would actually have room to grow in a manner like this Apple exec talks about. Where it could be a more apt companion to the Mac than the iPhone. Apple has only provided modest growth on that from without really forging a path that elevates the iPad properly.

You get the, I'll call it, low hanging fruit that many of us have wanted. MacOS on the iPad in a dual boot scenario. That may never come or it may who knows? But that's low hanging fruit in that it is an attempt to allow the iPad to be both an iPhone and a Mac companion without exactly doing either one perfectly. I see that as a stop gap if it ever did arrive. The true form should be a proper melding of the iPad and the Mac when used together to pull them into delivering workflows that aren't possible without the two of them. That should be their goal... To give you workflows that work well with the iPad alone, the Mac alone, and ones that just make it feel like a chef's kiss when combined.

A low hanging fruit in that capacity? Apple leveraging WiFi 6E or 7 direct connections to take Continuity to a new level. You can pick up your iPad and natively control your Mac at full speed. Allowing you to bring touch into your workflow or to decouple your workflow from your Desk. That includes being able to access things like portable HDDs or etc mounted on the Mac on the iPad. The inverse should also be possible. The idea being to allow the iPad and the Mac to play to their strengths without limitations.

Open up iPadOS to allow actual professional class tools. Allow Time Machine to enable real local iPad backups, for instance, and not limit it to the slow mess that is iCloud Backups. Good luck trying to restore 2TB of data to an iPad on a slow internet connection...

There is a lot that can be done here, but Apple so far hasn't really tried to deliver compelling stories.

That's my opinion anyway.
 
Has anyone asked an Apple executive why they don't offer cellular on MacBooks?
Probably licensing costs make it less pretty.

I imagine if Apple were able to pull off its own 5G modem like they planned to it would happen. Otherwise, they'd need to buy modems from Qualcomm and those have historically been more expensive for "computers".
 
idk. I don’t mind that they’re separate devices / experiences.

it will be nice when iPadOS becomes more powerful, but I like the fact that I can do certain things and have a certain experience on iPad that isn’t the exact same as the Mac.
 
It can be frustrating to repeatedly highlight that many tech reviewers overlook that their use of a computer is not the only use of computers. Apart from digital artists, who may prefer to use an iPad over a traditional laptop for some of their work, several other mobile professionals use the iPad Pro because, for their specific needs, it provides a superior computing experience.

For instance, if you frequently scan and mark up documents for work, the iPad Pro is a better option than a MacBook Pro. Similarly, if you conduct virtual real estate walkthroughs with clients, the front and rear-facing cameras on the iPad Pro can be useful. If you're an event producer, the iPad Pros has a better color-accurate screen and powerful audio. Finally, if you're an architect or contractor working on-site, having a lightweight, powerful computer to conduct integrated location scans with LiDar measurements is a feature only available on the iPad Pro.

The iPad Pro is not a limited laptop; it is a high-performance tablet computer. It's important to note that the majority of users on these forums, as well as tech journalists, are basic iPad users. Therefore, it is important to recognize that the iPad Pro may not be the ideal device for them. Fortunately, Apple offers the base iPad at a very reasonable price, which is a great alternative for those who don't need the advanced features of the iPad Pro.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.