Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Nano texture isn’t like a paper-like screen cover. You can’t feel the texture with your nail or with a pencil. It’s super nano and very smooth. All it does is dampen reflections.

They really shouldn't have called it 'texture' in the name. I was hoping it was going to be a paper like texture for a better writing experience, very confusing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MaximizedAction
They really shouldn't have called it 'texture' in the name. I was hoping it was going to be a paper like texture for a better writing experience, very confusing.

The biggest criticism with paper-like screen covers is that they wear down plastic nibs. That also happens with the default textured Wacom Intuos tablet cover. The nib won’t last a week.

So even though your drawing and writing with Apple Pencil Pro won’t be ‘grippy’ the nib wear problem doesn’t happen with the nano XDR screen.

The best solution for a paper-like experience isn’t really a display texture anyway. Apps like Photoshop and Clip Studio have an option to turn ‘smoothing’ on. This option slows down the flow of digital ink/paint and simulates the way lines are drawn cleanly on paper. It works really well at removing the kind of wobble that happens when a plastic nib moves across a tablet.
 
Are y’all saying that you expect the quality of the nano texture screen to be less than the standard screen?
 
I have the low-reflectivity nano coating on my S24U. It's very nice. Charging extra for it on the "pro" device is egregious though.
can you tell if it has more 'drag.' i wouldn't mind a little more drag with the apple pencil, but wouldn't like a rough texture. i find those unpleasant when using fingers.
 
can you tell if it has more 'drag.' i wouldn't mind a little more drag with the apple pencil, but wouldn't like a rough texture. i find those unpleasant when using fingers.
It doesn't look or feel any different than what you'd expect on a phone. Until you notice reflections are much dimmer than normal.

I'm assuming this is the same coating/layer Apple will be using.

nope, Apple's is an actual texture. Samsung's/Corning's solution doesnt look any different than screen glass. I haven't experienced Apple's in-person yet.
 
Last edited:
It makes absolutely sense to add nano texture glass to a touch device. Debris and dirt accumulate much faster and is harder to remove, resulting in 'faulty' glass so it gives it boost to the Apple services revenue.

Classic!
Yeah, it will be very interesting to see how this plays out... The smudges on the desktop nanotexture Apple displays seems hard to get rid of...
 
Sounds like Apple didn't learn anything from the VisionPro debacle. An iPad for $2,400 PLUS TAX isn't going to sell like hotcakes. You could buy a real nice Macbook Pro for that, if you're into high end imaging.
Problem isn't that there's a $4k Vision Pro. It's that the cheapest Vision Pro is $3500.
 
  • Like
Reactions: victorvictoria
Nano texture isn’t like a paper-like screen cover. You can’t feel the texture with your nail or with a pencil. It’s super nano and very smooth. All it does is dampen reflections.
Thank you for commenting about this... I was going back and forth whether it was worth the upsell for more pencil drag (I obviously use the pencil a LOT). Guess like I'll wait for paper-like to put out one for the new model. Thanks again!
 
What do you mean? I did my taxes on my ipad pro just last month.
I mean running a standalone version of the software as opposed to a web version. The iPad/iPhone apps are just a UI to the web version. In the past there were many advanced features that weren't available on the web, e.g. filing an amendment to a prior year return.
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
I mean running a standalone version of the software as opposed to a web version. The iPad/iPhone apps are just a UI to the web version. In the past there were many advanced features that weren't available on the web, e.g. filing an amendment to a prior year return.

It seemed to have a bespoke UI, at least compared to the website for the same software / service I used the year before.

Either way - isn't it on developers to make the 'Pro' software?
 
I mean running a standalone version of the software as opposed to a web version. The iPad/iPhone apps are just a UI to the web version. In the past there were many advanced features that weren't available on the web, e.g. filing an amendment to a prior year return.
That’s the fault of the software vendors, not the iPad.
 
It seemed to have a bespoke UI, at least compared to the website for the same software / service I used the year before.

Either way - isn't it on developers to make the 'Pro' software?
It is, but they don't consider the iPad Pro to be pro enough to dedicate resources to it. :)

There are many folks that own a cheap windows or macos machine just for tax purposes.
 
Hard pass on this one. It’s almost impossible with average use to keep the displace free from dust. Being a touch device over time the nano texture class will become polished and uneven.
The displace won’t be as sharp or bright and reduces contrast as the non nano texture display.
 
And on reflection (pun intended) I just cancelled and changed to get rid of the nano texture screen. Just not worth the risk on gen 1.
This isn't a gen1 product. Apple already sell monitors with the same texture. Apple always tests manufacting processors on other products. For example, the guinea pig for the Macbook OLED is the iPad OLED. The guinea pig for the iPad OLED, was the iPhone OLED.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.