Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This isn't a gen1 product. Apple already sell monitors with the same texture. Apple always tests manufacting processors on other products. For example, the guinea pig for the Macbook OLED is the iPad OLED. The guinea pig for the iPad OLED, was the iPhone OLED.
Do the monitors have touch?
 
This isn't a gen1 product. Apple already sell monitors with the same texture. Apple always tests manufacting processors on other products. For example, the guinea pig for the Macbook OLED is the iPad OLED. The guinea pig for the iPad OLED, was the iPhone OLED.
It’s gen 1 for a display you touch and use a pencil on. I’ll wait to see how it holds up over a couple of years before I risk a $2000 device on it.
 
It’s gen 1 for a display you touch and use a pencil on. I’ll wait to see how it holds up over a couple of years before I risk a $2000 device on it.
Its the same surface layer according to Apple and oviously a touch surface layer below. You don't like it, you can buy paper touch surfaces to stick on. Whats the risk, you have 14 calander days to return it.
 
Its the same surface layer according to Apple and oviously a touch surface layer below. You don't like it, you can buy paper touch surfaces to stick on. Whats the risk, you have 14 calander days to return it.
The risk is that over the multi-year lifespan of the device, that it doesn’t hold up. 14 days isn’t anywhere near enough to gauge durability. Given that they are completely paranoid about it on monitors (and even include a polishing cloth with the iPad version), I’m cautious. Between the butterfly keyboard and the screen delamination problems, I’ll let others blaze this particular trail.

Put it another way, regretting getting it is a lot more expensive than regretting not getting it, at least for me. Not judging others, or saying folks shouldn’t, just that I’m cautious about FOAK stuff from Apple these days.
 
I have the Pro Display XDR and the nano-glass, sorry to say is a real disappointment. I ended up trading it in and went to the standard glass as it made looking at text and certain images fuzzy. Unless you are working in pitch black cases or actually work in a studio lighting environment definitely not worth it. Actually found nano to be a downgrade for my use cases.
It looks so good in the store, noticeably deeper looking colors due to the lack of reflectivity from overhead/ambient light. I was very tempted to buy the studio display with nano-texture, but I was concerned about longevity, since I would prefer a monitor last a long time. Plus, adding tilt-and-height adujustablity option is already a big bump in price, since they‘re seemingly impossible to find discounted, unlike the standard model.
 
Can I just say, I have the paper like screen cover on my current iPad and absolutely love it. No smudges, no glare, it does dampen color / blacks just a bit is the con. But the feel of it is great when drawing as I hate drawing on an ice skating rink.

i order the 1T standard glass and I’ll add the paper like screen cover when it releases. Then when I sell it, it wont be nearly as difficult I don’t think. Unless this nano thing ends up being the go to of course.
 
Not surprised with Apple's move. But a good matte screen protector should be enough for most
 
Must be selling very well, as the Nano ones are already a month backordered. I prefer Matte, as I read a lot of newspapers and think they look better on a matte screen. Also prefer them as less fingerprint marks and easier to keep clean.

Curious if the Nano screen will also be less, noticeable fingerprint marks?

I just wish Apple had the Nano screen available on 256ssd models. I don’t need 1TB ssd. Huge cost upgrade to move to 1TB, especially when it will never be used to its potential, at least for me.
 
It looks so good in the store, noticeably deeper looking colors due to the lack of reflectivity from overhead/ambient light. I was very tempted to buy the studio display with nano-texture, but I was concerned about longevity, since I would prefer a monitor last a long time. Plus, adding tilt-and-height adujustablity option is already a big bump in price, since they‘re seemingly impossible to find discounted, unlike the standard model.
I watched MKBHD’s impressions video last night, and in it he echoed the sentiment of the poster you replied to: that the nanotexture glass makes things a little fuzzier, and that there’s a noticeable difference between the screen and the bezel, which may bother some.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FriendlyMackle
I watched MKBHD’s impressions video last night, and in it he echoed the sentiment of the poster you replied to: that the nanotexture glass makes things a little fuzzier, and that there’s a noticeable difference between the screen and the bezel, which may bother some.
do you have a link to that video?
 
Can I just say, I have the paper like screen cover on my current iPad and absolutely love it. No smudges, no glare, it does dampen color / blacks just a bit is the con. But the feel of it is great when drawing as I hate drawing on an ice skating rink.

i order the 1T standard glass and I’ll add the paper like screen cover when it releases. Then when I sell it, it wont be nearly as difficult I don’t think. Unless this nano thing ends up being the go to of course.
The nano-texture display may be using nanobot tech - and that does require more hard drive space for the little bots to reside in when they are not in use. I don't think this is just a forced upgrade cash grab.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.