I think you’re talking about people who are very unfamiliar with computers, right? But I’m talking about experienced computer users.Nope.
People have been poking screens with their greasy fingers for DECADES. Many years before the vast majority of people had ever used a touchscreen, they poked at computer screens. I've seen them do it, I've had to clean the mess before I could tolerate using their computer long enough to see what problem they were on about, I've seen them immediately poke it again after I told them to stop touching it.
The screen touchers weren't trained back then, they were born.
Again, let me reiterate that I’m not saying touch is not more intuitive than indirect pointing. It’s obvious it is. When a new computer user mistakenly touches a screen, that is because touch is more intuitive. But I’m making the subtle point that when experienced computer users such as in these forums mistakenly touch a screen, that is not evidence of intuition, but of muscle memory, because they are switching back and forth with touch devices. If the reflex was more due to intuition, then experienced computer users back in the days before touch screens would have been mistakenly touching their screens nearly as often, but they weren’t. And again, muscle memory causes people to mistaken touch/reach for nonexistent trackpads and mice too—that doesn’t mean those are more intuitive. The (side) point was that we should understand and use evidence properly.
Last edited: