Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Slide over is completely gone. You can accomplish something similar with the new windowing mode, but it's less space efficient and requires more steps to make it work. It also causes issues with touchscreen gestures in safari. The previous page swipe gesture now has a 60% chance of grabbing the edge and shrinking the safari window rather than going back a page like I actually want.

The ONLY thing thats good about this new format is that I can have 3 vertical windows tiled side by side at the same time on my ipad now. It's neat but it's just not worth giving up what I already had and liked before. I expected to have to learn something different but I actually HATE using my ipad now.
Thank you for saving me from ruining my iPad. Hoping this is a bug and slide over is fixed in future builds. I like to leave my trading platform full screen and just flick my messages open to answer a text and then flick them back out of the way (completely off the screen). The people who always whined about iPad sucking compared to a Mac clearly just never bothered to learn all the gestures. When I show people why the iPad (with Magic Keyboard) is better than my Mac their heads explode.
 
Sounds great but I still don't see why they don't just make windowing, desktops and the Finder exactly like on the Mac. It's almost the same but with some weird limitations that don't really make sense. Like why can't you have multiple desktops with windows and full screen apps, instead of ONE "windowed" space that gets broken apart the moment you start using an app in full screen? Often I'd want two apps side by side, and then I want to check something else and them come back to my side-by-side apps as they were, instead of having to set them up again.
Why not just run MacOS in a virtual machine on the iPad and choose which to use? I mean it should be a no brainer. Apple could make this function only work on new iPad Pro models with 16GB of RAM to sell more. I would upgrade from the M4 in a heartbeat for the capability. It would allow me to travel with just an iPad Pro. To me they keep saying what’s a computer and showing the iPad but it’s been terrible at any type of multitasking. It could be so perfect if they didn’t try to reinvent the Mac and just did it. But you know the only reason they won’t is that Apple’s ecosystem makes 30% on iPadOS Apps and zero on Mac apps not distributed through the App Store. And here’s the thing for all the fans who have to defend AAPL and Crook, and just want to run one window iPadOS, let them. Let us all choose what we want. We paid dearly for these things that have as much power as a Mac but are so limited it has ruined what could be amazing for many years now.
 
I made a comment like this post title during a keynote 8 or 10 years ago, and was downvoted into oblivion. Oh well, times change...
Glad all guys downvoting you are wrong. And glad all people scoffing at these ideas are wrong.
 
Great, it's time Apple makes use all of those high performance hardware on iPad Pros. But will it be real this time? Apple has been telling iPad will be the only computer you need for years now, but that never happens.

Not a single Mac screen has OLED, or touchscreen, or FaceID with decent camera, or 5G network. But iPad Pro has it all, only problem is it comes with gimped iPadOS.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Shirasaki
The issue that prevents me from going completely iPad is the apps. Office is too stripped down and no good IDE to code. Apple could make it more Mac like but unless apps follows it still is not doing it for me. YMMV.
why would Apple want you to stop buying MacBooks?
 
This is meaningless to me. Part of the reason iPadOS doesn't feel like MacOS is because Apple is so strict with memory management on iPadOS. Just try switching between tabs in a browser on iPadOS. Unless you only have two or three tabs open, it's nothing like on MacOS. And good luck switching between apps and then back to the browser. Basically every tab then reloads. It's terrible behavior. iPadOS was designed as a mobile first OS back when the hardware was extremely limited.

And until I can install other web browsers that aren't just Safari with a different skin on top, I also won't use an iPad for anything serious.
 
I think iPadOS 26 is a big step backwards. Apple was right from the beginning that in a touch-first device, desktop paradigms don’t work well. You don’t want traffic lights with small targets (even if they’re hidden by default) or an out-of-context menu bar on a touch device.

That’s the reason why some people in the comments think “something feels wrong”. Some will argue that you can connect the MK, but:
  • It’s optional (otherwise an iPad would be just a bad laptop).
  • The iPad needs to transition between keyboard and non-keyboard mode. You can’t create two completely different interfaces.
And the second point is why we lost two multitasking methods that really worked and felt native to the iPad.

This is not about making the iPad more professional. Many people already use the iPad in professional ways, in the fields it excels at. There are many powerful applications that make use of its capabilities.

Now, long-time iPad users will be frustrated because UX is worse, while the tech bubble will be still frustrated because they’ll realise windows just can’t work on an iPad.
 
Why not just run MacOS in a virtual machine on the iPad and choose which to use? I mean it should be a no brainer.
Why not just run MacOS in a virtual machine on the Apple Watch? I just find it very weird that some of you here associate the iPad to the Mac. There are some overlapping use cases (the iPhone also overlaps with a Mac) but they’re two completely different devices. The question is not “why not”, but “why”. And macOS on the iPad would be a terrible experience.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.