Apples reputation in your mind doesn't translate to the rest of the population. Apple suffered absolutely zero reputation loss over AirPower.
Try Googling that.
Apples reputation in your mind doesn't translate to the rest of the population. Apple suffered absolutely zero reputation loss over AirPower.
I already mentioned the chip. But I doubt any teardowns would know what it was. Nobody identified any chips in the S10 teardowns for wireless charging.Actually there would be hardware present, along with an additional chip. Apple Watch charges via proprietary methods so the standard Qi coils won’t work as efficient for the watch. Perhaps on AirPods.
It’s a bit of a pain, but hey, it’s Apple we’re talking about.
Exactly - if I am Tim and somebody cannot guaranteed zero issues especially with something as delicate as battery management - then that feature won't be shipped. That designed was probably locked down 2 years ago (likely) by the same folks that also did the Airpower and anything related to charging/battery is tainted.To take the contrarian view.....it could also be that Apple is resolved to not talking about any non-ready-to-ship wireless charging features until they are 100% certain it actually works after the AirPower embarrassment.
Uh, isn't telling someone to "google an answer" against forum rules?Try Googling that.
I have tried this once with my S10+. The device you are charging, charges slowly so I have never tried it again. I always keep an Anker 21,000 battery pack in my car because it charges much faster. the Anker fast charges my S10+ and my Note 10.
I am skipping the iPhone this year and bought the Note 10+ instead.
But why disable it will it ever be released
I'm interested even more now to see what the iFixIt teardown reveals. If it does reveal hardware for bilateral charging, Apple will almost HAVE to make a statement explaining why they chose to abort the feature at the last minute. Talk about bad PR.
Does anyone really give a damn about this feature? I sure don’t. Sounds like it’s just another thing to complain about just because and when we finally have it no one will ever use it.
Where would you put your hands?
it would be nice to have the ability to charge my apple watch but honestly if I had to lay my phone flat on the table and basically disable my phone to charge my watch I doubt I would use the feature - it will be an interesting topic of discussion if they in fact built the 11 with the hardware but decided last minute to disable the feature. This could be the ultimate "oh, and one last thing..." if they turn the feature on next Friday- haha
But why disable it will it ever be released
Uh, isn't telling someone to "google an answer" against forum rules?
Apple stock price is up significantly since AirPower was cancelled. Their quarterly results immediately after they cancelled set a new company record. They still have the highest customer satisfaction in the industry.
Your claim is pure BS.
Try Googling that.
I think it will just burn up the life cycle of the iphone battery.My guess is that it would nuke your battery to the point where it's not really worth it. I'm curious to know if it's an issue of hardware/software/or both. If it's just software, maybe they can get it figured out eventually.
I doubt they will HAVE to make any statement - they never promise this featureI'm interested even more now to see what the iFixIt teardown reveals. If it does reveal hardware for bilateral charging, Apple will almost HAVE to make a statement explaining why they chose to abort the feature at the last minute. Talk about bad PR.
One extRA thing to complain about ;(Does anyone really give a damn about this feature? I sure don’t. Sounds like it’s just another thing to complain about just because and when we finally have it no one will ever use it.
I've used it on my Note 10+ to charge the galaxy buds just a couple of times. It's not that fast at all, and certainly isn't efficient.The charging efficiency is probably very bad. People are complaining about the Samsung Powershare feature as well. Basically, 80% of power is completely lost as heat (Example: one phone loses 15% battery while the other only gains 3%). It might be ok to charge small devices like an apple watch or the airpods but definitely not a phone.
yea I saw the same youtube video - IMO - this is a marketing feature you can trumpet about - the real benefit is that Apple had to finally add a bigger batteryI watched some trials of the feature on YouTube. The *best* result I saw was in a 15-minute test. The charger lost 13% of battery life and the chargee only gained 6%. Less than 50% efficient, and a waste of 15 minutes. Considering a fast charger can take your phone from 0-50% in 30 minutes, this feature is nothing but a gimmick.
You really have some astounding posts. Comparing the Chernobyl incident to Apple's earning?The radiation reports immediately after Chernobyl were fine too
This seems unlikely. If the hardware were there, why not enable wireless charging when the iPhone is being charged with a lightning connector? You could charge the phone plus another device off one cable. Efficiency isn't an issue for a phone being charged.
My guess is that it hurt battery life too much or wasn’t reliable enough. If they were going to enable it later they’d have said so.For those thinking this will be enabled in a future software update, don’t get your hopes up. It would’ve been a selling point, and Apple would’ve talked about it on stage.