Glad someone honest is exposing BS marketing hype.
I think there is value in knowing how much a device can take. Helps when deciding what style of case you purchase and whether to use a screen protector or not. I didn't get the impression his objective was to prove he could damage...Is it really necessary to prove that most anything can be scratched if you try hard enough,. what a waste of time and iPhones...
Glad someone honest is exposing BS marketing hype.
Check. 😂Since you scratch more screens than you shatter, seems like you should optimize for the common case![]()
When I preordered the 12, I took the case off my Xs. I wanted to see how it was commando. The damn thing is slick and basically an air hockey puck on everything I set it on. Made it about 10 days before it slipped and I wasn't fast enough to catch it. Now, a week before trading in it has a chip on the corner 🤷♂️ Put the case back on last night.I rarely drop my phone. But it has slipped from my hand occasionally. I bought a thin Speck case and cheap glass screen protectors. The screen has never scratched or shattered; albeit I have had to replace the screen protector a number of times. My iPhone 7+ still looks very pristine.
What happened to Sapphire. It would be so much better. Seems I will have to get a glass protective screen once I have the mortgage approved for a 12 Pro Max
Weird. I've seen multiple channels say it scratches at level 7 with deeper grooves at a level 8 and some have even mentioned how JerryRigEverything will find similar results. Is there much variation between kits or is it the technique used, such as how firmly you press when attempting to scratch? Either way, I'd rather have better shatter protection than scratch protection at this point. The few scratches my iPhone accumulates every year are pretty faint nowadays and I only notice them when the display is off.
Check. 😂
Though, it is cheaper to accept a few hairline scratches than it is to pay for a new screen (through applecare, or outright).
Bishop takes Knight.
Better resilience to drops was indeed the focus of Apple.Well, the point of a test like this is to use instruments with known hardness levels and see if the marketing actually means anything.
Considering Apple made a point to market the screen with a ceramic coating, I was expecting it to be at least notably more resistant to scratches than previous models. But tests show its performance is about the same.
Seems more drop resistant though, which is a plus. Maybe that was the overall goal here. Cracked screens are infinitely worse than scratches, after all.
What exactly is Apple BSing about?Glad someone honest is exposing BS marketing hype.
Probably should lead the article with this.In fairness to Apple, it advertises the Ceramic Shield as providing 4x the drop performance, rather than improved scratch resistance.
Glad someone honest is exposing BS marketing hype.
In fairness to Apple, it advertises the Ceramic Shield as providing 4x the drop performance, rather than improved scratch resistance.
back in the day you had confusing plastic buttons controlling the interfaceAnother poster the other day said wanted pop out replaceable plastic display. Back in the day cell phones had plastic screens and were indestructable.
apparently you have no idea what's the difference between dropping something and scratching somethingGlad someone honest is exposing BS marketing hype.