Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Is it really necessary to prove that most anything can be scratched if you try hard enough,. what a waste of time and iPhones...
I think there is value in knowing how much a device can take. Helps when deciding what style of case you purchase and whether to use a screen protector or not. I didn't get the impression his objective was to prove he could damage...
 
  • Like
Reactions: eulslix
Since you scratch more screens than you shatter, seems like you should optimize for the common case :)
Check. 😂

Though, it is cheaper to accept a few hairline scratches than it is to pay for a new screen (through applecare, or outright).

Bishop takes Knight.
 
I rarely drop my phone. But it has slipped from my hand occasionally. I bought a thin Speck case and cheap glass screen protectors. The screen has never scratched or shattered; albeit I have had to replace the screen protector a number of times. My iPhone 7+ still looks very pristine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JM and philrock
I rarely drop my phone. But it has slipped from my hand occasionally. I bought a thin Speck case and cheap glass screen protectors. The screen has never scratched or shattered; albeit I have had to replace the screen protector a number of times. My iPhone 7+ still looks very pristine.
When I preordered the 12, I took the case off my Xs. I wanted to see how it was commando. The damn thing is slick and basically an air hockey puck on everything I set it on. Made it about 10 days before it slipped and I wasn't fast enough to catch it. Now, a week before trading in it has a chip on the corner 🤷‍♂️ Put the case back on last night.
 
What happened to Sapphire. It would be so much better. Seems I will have to get a glass protective screen once I have the mortgage approved for a 12 Pro Max

It’s costly. In the end, it would raise the iPhone price with displays that large. And maybe there might be some manufacturing concerns for sapphire on that level. But consider the drawback to sapphire, and that would be reflectivity, as it does with the Apple Watch on the Sapphire display for the stainless/ceramic model.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ocva
Weird. I've seen multiple channels say it scratches at level 7 with deeper grooves at a level 8 and some have even mentioned how JerryRigEverything will find similar results. Is there much variation between kits or is it the technique used, such as how firmly you press when attempting to scratch? Either way, I'd rather have better shatter protection than scratch protection at this point. The few scratches my iPhone accumulates every year are pretty faint nowadays and I only notice them when the display is off.

Technique, none of these tests are that accurate as a human is doing them using manual non-analytical tools.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mc0
Check. 😂

Though, it is cheaper to accept a few hairline scratches than it is to pay for a new screen (through applecare, or outright).

Bishop takes Knight.

Except that a scratched up phone is horrible so you should pay for a new screen anyway. Pawn takes quarterback.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: eulslix and JM
Well, the point of a test like this is to use instruments with known hardness levels and see if the marketing actually means anything.

Considering Apple made a point to market the screen with a ceramic coating, I was expecting it to be at least notably more resistant to scratches than previous models. But tests show its performance is about the same.

Seems more drop resistant though, which is a plus. Maybe that was the overall goal here. Cracked screens are infinitely worse than scratches, after all.
Better resilience to drops was indeed the focus of Apple.

I am not surprised by the common sense results. Many people see better drop protection, and they automatically equate that with better scratch resistance.

I will continue using a screen protector.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JM
I'd rather have better shatter resistance than scratch resistance. I use a screen protector anyway and while anything can happen to these phones, better anything is always a plus.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JM
Didn't Apple say a few years back that no screen protector was needed, and even went as far as to remove them from stores?
 
one of the worst youtubers ever

this is the guy that did his video of proving that the iPad Pro is easily bent because he can bend it with his hands. so "scientific"...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mc0
Makes sense. One reviewer made the point that any glass that is more shatter proof may be slightly softer and able to flex a bit when dropped before smashing. So it may actually scratch more easily ( He already had a scratch within a few days) Any harder glass may be more prone to shattering but less to scratching. I think it’s a good trade off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: philrock
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.