Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The only thing I complain about the iPhone outside the US not having mmWave is that the price didn’t get lower for those countries. So basically we are paying the same for less.

USA prices are without tax, EU prices are include tax, import duties, fees, etc. Plus we get a whopping better warranty.

so we pay the same, for a hell of a lot more ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: dhruveonmars
Without 5G this is not really a worthwhile upgrade from an 11 Pro Max in the UK. The LiDAR scanner is cool, I'm hoping someone does an app where you can put your phone into one of the cheap phone VR helmet holders and use it for night vision goggles via LiDAR scanning. Not sure if that's worth the price though...
 
How is it possible for 5G to be slower than 4G?
I think regular (non mm-wave) 5G is basically the same as 4G... are there any benefits to it?

this graphic is very disappointing.

In low bands with a similar antenna set up on the tower and assuming spectrum is dedicated to 5G, it provides about a 20% increase in overall network capacity, plus a reduction in latency compared to 4G.

Crazy 5G speeds come into play when larger chunks of wireless spectrum are utilized for it. The problem is that those kinds of open spectrum chunks are only available in higher frequencies. The issue of course is that the higher the frequency, the lower the signal propagation characteristics. So you can have higher speeds but at the cost of reduced coverage.
 
Does mmWave matter for any non Verizon customers?

Well, given its limited deployment, it hardly even matters to Verizon customers 😄

Eventually, most carriers will deploy some mmWave but it will mostly be done in specific locations which can get around its problematic signal coverage issues. It will also probably be used for fixed wireless broadband applications where you have the option of placing the antenna in the most optimal, but fixed location somewhere around your house.
 
How is it possible for 5G to be slower than 4G?
I think regular (non mm-wave) 5G is basically the same as 4G... are there any benefits to it?

this graphic is very disappointing.

You're right to be disappointed. All the US national carriers have oversold the current state of 5G, T-Mobile included. Their widely advertised 5G network also relies mostly on low-band 600Mhz frequency right now. The range is good, it works indoors, but speed is not much different than 4G. The key for T-Mobile is they have started to launch mid-band 5G in the 2.5Ghz band using spectrum that they got from Sprint, which had a ton of it. Verizon and AT&T have very little mid-band available to them. Mid-band 5G is not as fast as the ultra high-band mmWave 5G but significantly faster than low-band 5G or 4G LTE. Mid-band frequency is what almost all other countries besides the USA are using for their 5G, the US didn't because that spectrum was already being used. However, the mid-band spectrum is being cleared and will be auctioned next year - the assumption is Verizon and AT&T will be very active in those auctions (they're also petitioning the FCC to prevent T-Mobile from acquiring more spectrum on the grounds that T-Mobile already has too much).
 
Last edited:
I barely see 4G let alone 5G, I mean it says 4G but the speeds are the same as HSPA+ that I was getting in 2012, so I know It isn't 4G.
 
Why is the US 5G different than the rest of the world? isn't this a standard?
 
Why is the US 5G different than the rest of the world? isn't this a standard?
Different governing bodies cut up and sell off different parts of the spectrum to different companies in different countries. That's why we had to have Quadband GSM phones to be able to use your phone anywhere in the world. There were 4 different frequency ranges a country's cell phone network could have been on.

Not much has improved/changed since then.
 
I note there also is the 600MHz 5G band which is supported in the Canadian (and US) version, but not in the European one... Not sure what the pipeline is for this?

UK has just moved TV out of 700MHz (to sell for 5g) and condensed it into 600MHz. TV will have to move to internet next as mobile eats all the spectrum
 
I am about tired of US carriers (Verizon) pushing for this mmwave support across the board... The majority of the US will NEVER see mmwave 5G coverage (unless they can figure out how to make such a high frequency signal have FAR more range). So to push for mmwave inclusion (thus increasing cost) is crazy... Just add sub 6ghz support and call it a day. Verizon did this to Google with the Pixel 5 and Pixel 4a 5G. The pixel 5 actually costs less outside the US and the 4a 5G costs $100 more for the Verizon variant due to mmwave support.
It’s their lost. They should’ve gone the Apple way, ask for subsidies from Verizon, and still sell iPhones at higher prices but with less features outside the US. Can’t beat Apple’s brilliance in business....
 
Remember, kids, 5G is only a marketing slogan, it is not yet real. Maybe after 2-3 years it will be a thing to be desired worldwide. :) Apple is asking you to pay for the 5G idea, not the actual thing.
 
Remember, kids, 5G is only a marketing slogan, it is not yet real. Maybe after 2-3 years it will be a thing to be desired worldwide. :) Apple is asking you to pay for the 5G idea, not the actual thing.
It's real, just not widespread by any means, and not necessarily to the fullest capacity of what it can be capable of yet.
 
Different governing bodies cut up and sell off different parts of the spectrum to different companies in different countries. That's why we had to have Quadband GSM phones to be able to use your phone anywhere in the world. There were 4 different frequency ranges a country's cell phone network could have been on.

Not much has improved/changed since then.

So do we have a "quadband" 5G here so it works every where or what? Is the iPhone 12 going to have 5G outside of US?
 
You're right to be disappointed. All the US national carriers have oversold the current state of 5G, T-Mobile included. Their widely advertised 5G network also relies mostly on low-band 600Mhz frequency right now. The range is good, it works indoors, but speed is not much different than 4G. The key for T-Mobile is they have started to launch mid-band 5G in the 2.5Ghz band using spectrum that they got from Sprint, which had a ton of it. Verizon and AT&T have very little mid-band available to them. Mid-band 5G is not as fast as the ultra high-band mmWave 5G but significantly faster than low-band 5G or 4G LTE. Mid-band frequency is what almost all other countries besides the USA are using for their 5G, the US didn't because that spectrum was already being used. However, the mid-band spectrum is being cleared and will be auctioned next year - the assumption is Verizon and AT&T will be very active in those auctions (they're also petitioning the FCC to prevent T-Mobile from acquiring more spectrum on the grounds that T-Mobile already has too much).
This is good info!

I had no idea there were 3 bands being used for 5G (low, mid, mm Wave).

So last year I got to test drive a hot spot for free from T Mobile that claimed it was using 600Mhz.
Last December, it was very slow using that hotspot and I am in urban Los Angeles County....

Since there are more than one band of frequencies to use for 5G, how does the phone switch between them ??
 
Apple's only doing this to boost it's cash flow.
If Apple releases this,, most can't use 5G, so where will that end up ?

Possible lawsuits over something Apple just wants to set it's sites on which they cannot provide globally?

Wait until more countries offer 5G, then roll this out. But don't just use it for your own personal profit gain as "We are the first to offer 5G" (ya, except no one will be able to use it world wide)


At least while we wait, we can use other features locally. Apple may have a future yet.
 
I wonder if this would be worth getting from the states for future use in the coming 2-5 years in europe?

On the other hand there will probably be their own turbocharged 5G modems next year with 120 hz display in tow. So why upgrade today? And so the cycle continues.. next year I get cool feature X. Every time.. 😂
 
You're not dumb. The Verizon guy spent too much time talking about their (practically useless) mmWave 5G... though they finally admitted that you'll likely only find it in Stadiums, Venues, and Airports.

I'm sure we'll get more info soon.

Upon further research... I'm reading that Verizon is now using dynamic spectrum sharing (DSS) to basically split a tower's capacity between 4G and 5G.

So it sounds like you'll get 4G or soon 5G in most areas... but you won't get the insane 1gbps speeds unless you're in a major city on a sidewalk or stadium.

I'm fine with that. Though I honestly don't have a problem with 4G today.
I had to stand on a sidewalk to get this speed. Does a phone really need these crazily insane fast speeds?
20201027_225451.jpg
 
Is there any truth to the rumour that having 5G 'on' uses less battery for iPhone models outside of the US which don't have mmWave?
 
Is there any truth to the rumour that having 5G 'on' uses less battery for iPhone models outside of the US which don't have mmWave?
Yes that would make sense as mm Wave modem uses a lot of battery power.

Most of the lower frequency 5G is the mid and low frequencies which have longer range than the ultra short mm Wave towers.

So it makes sense if there are no mm Wave towers, that the modem does not need as much battery power to run it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Haribokart
I had to stand on a sidewalk to get this speed. Does a phone really need these crazily insane fast speeds? View attachment 975271
This is better then seeing a real life UFO :) for some of us speed test addicts . To answer the question yes it is , because it basically free's you from ever depending on fiber optics if you have supported gadgets with 5g and the coverage.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.