Actually it is.Water is not Wet
Water makes other things wet but it's not wet in itself...
Actually it is.Water is not Wet
Water makes other things wet but it's not wet in itself...
I can attest to that. I haven't gotten a scratch on any phone since at least before the iPhone X. Last night I had my iphone in my running shorts pocket, kneeling down in front of the tv to adjust some wires, and the thing slipped out of my pocket (which happens constantly now), and when I picked up the phone, a tiny but very noticeable scratch on the screen. And this is a soft wood floor. Maybe the kids tracked some sand in or something.The biggest complaints seems to be that as shatter resistance goes up scratch resistance goes down.
class action suit. come man, just go for it.Damn, I bought it thinking I could drive with my car on it.
I'll ask for a refund then.
The hardness would improve scratch resistance dramatically but also increase likelihood of shattering. No thanks.Too bad phones can't be carved from a solid diamond. I guess we'd somehow still need a case then too though lol.![]()
since Nokia, ca. 1998nOt DaMaGe PrOoF
No ****, since when has anything been "Damage proof"?
Pretty impressive results really. I don’t know how you calculate “4x better drop protection”
I didn’t know they had hockey in your state.Glad there some increased damage resistance. PSA: The iPhone 12 though is not a hockey puck.
If I had to make an educated guess, 6 feet would be the approximate height someone would be holding the phone from the ground in a standing position, which seems completely logical. I mean, you wouldn’t be dropping the phone from 10 feet or 15 feet, as you have to be on an elevated platform. But if you’re dropping your phone, it’s likely that you’re standing, which would be approximately a minimum of 5 feet from the ground in most scenarios for a teen/adult.Curious why they went with a 6ft drop test. Somewhere in the 3-4.5 ft range seems like it would be a little more realistic for where a phone is most likely to be dropped from.
you think Apple might be able to sell demo pieces for tests, not ones that are packed with real high tech cameras, sensitive screens, and expensive SSDs.It just seems wrong destroy a perfectly good phone.
you think Apple might be able to sell demo pieces for tests, not ones that are packed with real high tech cameras, sensitive screens, and expensive SSDs.
What does your personal opinion of something's importance, have to do with a direct answer to someone's else question?Pointing out the obvious doesn’t make it any more important.
Write it off. It's a business expenseIt just seems wrong destroy a perfectly good phone.
I was making a statement about the subject of the article. If I was addressing a specific member, I would have quoted the person.What does your personal opinion of something's importance, have to do with a direct answer to someone's else question?
Why would they sell a demo phone? (Rhetorical) They could easily lend a demo phone to a tester and then they return it. There would be no reason for them to ‘sell’ it.
Also, your idea doesn’t work. The reason is, if you sell a demo phone that’s missing all the technology that you referring to, that would affect the outcome of the drop itself, because the weight differential would be completely different.